May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldman Applanation Tonometry in Eyes with Keratoconus
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. Babic
    Department of Glaucoma, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • J. Barreto, Jr.
    Department of Glaucoma, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • R.M. Vessani
    Department of Glaucoma, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • L.M. Alencar
    Department of Glaucoma, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • M. Hatanaka
    Department of Glaucoma, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • C.G. V. Moraes
    Department of Glaucoma, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • R. Susanna, Jr.
    Department of Glaucoma, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M. Babic, None; J. Barreto, None; R.M. Vessani, None; L.M. Alencar, None; M. Hatanaka, None; C.G.V. Moraes, None; R. Susanna, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 4448. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Babic, J. Barreto, Jr., R.M. Vessani, L.M. Alencar, M. Hatanaka, C.G. V. Moraes, R. Susanna, Jr.; Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldman Applanation Tonometry in Eyes with Keratoconus . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):4448.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) is a non–applanation contact tonometer designed to be largely independent of the structural properties of the cornea. Theoretically, it may measure IOP most accurately in abnormally thinner corneas. This study compares IOP measurements by DCT with Goldman applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with normal corneas and eyes with advanced keratoconus (KC).

Methods: : A prospective comparative case series. Subjects were submitted to IOP measurement by GAT, DCT, ultrassonic pachymetry and slit scanning topography (Orbscan IIz). Exclusion criteria: any ocular pathology other than KC, previous corneal or refractive surgery, stromal scarring due to acute hydrops or any other corneal opacities.

Results: : Ten patients with KC were included in Group A and 12 normal patients composed Group B according to the pre–established criteria. The mean GAT measurement in group A was 10.3±1.8 mmHg and group B was14.3±0.75 mmHg. (p = 0,024). In group A, the mean DCT measurement was 14.6±2,09 mmHg and, in group B, the mean DCT measurement was 17,4±3,1 mmHg (p = 0,026). The difference between GAT and DCT measurements in group A was statistically significant (p < 0.0002).

Conclusions: : IOP readings with the DCT in the keratoconus group were significantly higher than GAT measurements and lower when comparing to the control group. As there are no published manometric studies in eyes with KC, these lower IOP readings with the DCT could be related to the discrepancy between the radius of corneal curvature and DCT tip, the important thinning of the cornea, or other corneal biomechanical abnormalities related to advanced KC.

Keywords: intraocular pressure • keratoconus 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×