May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Interpolating Light And Shadow In V1
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • V.J. Chen
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
    Radiology,
  • K. Tarczy–Hornoch
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
    Ophthalmology,
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  V.J. Chen, None; K. Tarczy–Hornoch, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 5876. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      V.J. Chen, K. Tarczy–Hornoch; Interpolating Light And Shadow In V1 . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):5876.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The human visual system can perceive contours and forms that are not fully specified in the physical stimulus. Interpolation across time and space from relatively sparse sample signals is an essential property of such a robust system. A moving pattern of luminance modulation applied to a fixed sparse, random array of dots on a homogeneous background is perceived as clearly demarcated bands of light or shadow defined by the spatiotemporal pattern of dot luminance modulation, despite no actual luminance variation in the background. FMRI studies of illusory contours suggest they are processed by V3A or lateral occipital areas, but we find activation in primary visual cortex associated with spatiotemporal patterns of stimulation that give rise to interpolated percepts.

Methods: : Baseline stimuli were designed to match test stimuli in magnitude/frequency of dot luminance changes, and retinal motion of the dot array and the pattern of average luminance zones. A separate experiment controlled for any effect of reversal of retinal sweep direction for luminance zones in test vs. baseline conditions in the main experiment. The V1 region of interest (ROI) of each subject was located using a 10%/100% contrast–modulated checkerboard, and exported to other experiments for ROI analysis (SPM MarsBaR add–on).

Results: : In V1, Subject 1 showed positive BOLD contrast (t=2.35, p=0.01) in the main experiment, and negative BOLD contrast in the control. Subject 2 had borderline significant activation (t=1.53, p=0.06) in the main experiment, and no significant contrast in the control. With an alternative control design, Subject 3 had activation (t=2.11, p=0.02) in the main experiment, and none in the control.

Conclusions: : Increase of BOLD signals associated with stimuli eliciting spatiotemporally interpolated visual percepts can be seen in V1. Further work is needed to determine whether higher visual areas are essential for this, with feed–back to V1, or whether long–range connections in V1 itself can support integration over space and time to recover spatiotemporal patterns based on a series of fragmented views of a visual scene.

Keywords: visual cortex • motion-2D • scene perception 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×