May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Rate of Vitrectomy in the Fellow Eye of Patients Undergoing Primary Vitrectomy for Complications of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A.G. Sharma
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, MI
  • D. Eliott
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, MI
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.G. Sharma, None; D. Eliott, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 386. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A.G. Sharma, D. Eliott; Rate of Vitrectomy in the Fellow Eye of Patients Undergoing Primary Vitrectomy for Complications of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):386.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To study the rate of vitrectomy in the fellow eye of patients undergoing primary vitrectomy for complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods: A retrospective study was done on 283 consecutive patients requiring primary diabetic vitrectomy performed by one vitreoretinal surgeon at the Kresge Eye Institute. The primary vitrectomies were categorized into 3 distinct groups based on operative findings: (i) TRD/RRD (47/283)–combined tractional–rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (with or without vitreous hemorrhage); (ii) TRD (150/283)–tractional retinal detachment (with or without vitreous hemorrhage); and (iii) VH only (65/283)–nonclearing vitreous hemorrhage only. Preoperative characteristics, diagnoses, procedures, and factors predictive of fellow eye vitrectomy were analyzed. Results: Sixteen percent (45/283) of patients undergoing primary diabetic vitrectomy required vitrectomy in the fellow eye. The average time to vitrectomy in the fellow eye was 8 months. Twenty–eight percent of patients with TRD/RRD (13/47); 18% of patients with TRD (27/150); and 8% of patients with VH only (5/65), required vitrectomy in the fellow eye. The fellow eyes requiring vitrectomy had a TRD/RRD in 13% (6/45); a TRD in 69% (31/45); and VH only in 18% (8/45). Conclusions: Despite close follow up and extensive panretinal photocoagulation after undergoing primary vitrectomy, a considerable percentage of patients required fellow eye vitrectomy. The rate of vitrectomy in the fellow eye of 283 consecutive patients undergoing diabetic vitrectomy was 16% (45/283) at an average of 8 months after primary vitrectomy. Patients with TRD/RRD were more likely to require fellow eye vitrectomy. TRD/RRD is an advanced complication of PDR and may represent a risk factor for fellow eye vitrectomy.

Keywords: diabetic retinopathy 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×