May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Pressure Effect on Hydraulic Conductivity of Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D.M. Grzybowski
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • C.J. Roberts
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • B.K. Rivera
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • P.A. Weber
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.M. Grzybowski, None; C.J. Roberts, None; B.K. Rivera, None; P.A. Weber, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  American Health Assistance Foundation, Anne Ellis Fund of The Columbus Foundation, The Ohio Lions
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 1159. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D.M. Grzybowski, C.J. Roberts, B.K. Rivera, P.A. Weber; Pressure Effect on Hydraulic Conductivity of Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):1159.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Examine the influence of driving pressure on the efficacy of low fluence laser irradiation upon hydraulic conductivity of a monolayer of trabecular meshwork endothelial cells (TMEC). Methods: Confluent TMEC monolayers were perfused using an in vitro perfusion model at a starting pressure of 5, 10, 15 or 25 mm Hg. Experimental monolayers were irradiated with a diode laser (=810 nm) at a fluence level of 0.4286 or 0.3571 J/cm2. The fluence level was selected based on results of an experimental pilot series in which a change in conductivity(Lp) was noted, and viability of the cells was preserved. Each irradiated monolayer was run simultaneously with a non–irradiated control monolayer under the same environmental conditions. Irradiation took place following 15 minutes of steady state perfusion, after which perfusion and data collection continued for 60 minutes. Results: The treatment effect for the 0.4286 J/cm2 fluence level becomes statistically significant (p<0.01) at time interval 4 (1830–2100 sec.) when comparing all experiments to control. A statistically significant difference is found between the three increased pressure levels, with increase in Lp due to tissue irradiation decreasing with increasing pressure. This effect becomes statistically significant (p<0.01) at the 7th time interval (2730–3000 sec.). In previous studies, the lower fluence level, 0.3571 J/cm2, was found to be at or below irradiation threshold, producing an inconsistent cellular response. Therefore, the resultant pressure effect in the current study was confounded by the conflicting tissue interaction factor. The effect of increasing driving pressure was not found to be statistically significant at this lower fluence level. Conclusions: An increase in driving pressure produces a statistically significant reduction in the enhanced hydraulic conductivity response of the monolayer at a fluence level of 0.4286 J/cm2. We have shown that the 0.3571 J/cm2 fluence level represents trans–threshold irradiation, producing an inconsistent result. These results add further evidence that it is possible to promote an increase in hydraulic conductivity in a perfused human TMEC monolayer model using direct, non–destructive diode laser energy in a low fluence regime.

Keywords: trabecular meshwork • outflow: trabecular meshwork • laser 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×