May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Evaluation of an Ultrasonic Elasticity Measurement Device in Order to Diagnose and Manage Keratoconus
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • I. Donsoff
    Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital/NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • A. Kanellopoulos
    Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital/NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY
    NYLaservision.gr Institute, Athens, Greece
  • L. Pe
    NYLaservision.gr Institute, Athens, Greece
  • M. Jankov
    NYLaservision.gr Institute, Athens, Greece
  • L. Sperber
    Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital/NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  I. Donsoff, None; A. Kanellopoulos, None; L. Pe, None; M. Jankov, None; L. Sperber, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 2745. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      I. Donsoff, A. Kanellopoulos, L. Pe, M. Jankov, L. Sperber; Evaluation of an Ultrasonic Elasticity Measurement Device in Order to Diagnose and Manage Keratoconus . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):2745.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the safety and sensitivity of a contact cornea elasticity measuring device in patients with keratoconus. Methods: 25 consecutive keratoconus patients were evaluated with standard central ultrasonic pachymetry and a new contact cornea elasticity measuring device. We evaluated visual acuity, orbscan topography, refraction, pachymetry, and elasticity and compared to an age matched control 25 eyes without keratoconus. Results: 25 eyes were included. The mean values were: refractive error: sphere: –3.80D (–0.50—6.75) and cylinder: –3.85D (1 to –8.75). UCVA 20/200. Ealsticity was measured as a mean 1.9 (1.2–2.5) units in the keratoconus group, compared to 0.9 (0.7–1.2) units in the normal control. There were 2 normal eyes with abnormally high elasticity. Conclusions: This measuring device appears to be safe in clinical use and appears to provide reproducible higher elasticity measurement in keratoconic corneas. Some "normal" corneas may have abnormal measurements.

Keywords: keratoconus • cornea: clinical science • topography 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×