May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Refractive Outcomes of Primary Versus Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation in Paediatric Developmental Cataract Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • G. Ainsworth
    Ophthalmology, Queen Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • A. Bhan
    Ophthalmology, Queen Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • V.A. Shanmuganathan
    Ophthalmology, Queen Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • R.M. Gregson
    Ophthalmology, Queen Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  G. Ainsworth, None; A. Bhan, None; V.A. Shanmuganathan, None; R.M. Gregson, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 277. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      G. Ainsworth, A. Bhan, V.A. Shanmuganathan, R.M. Gregson; Refractive Outcomes of Primary Versus Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation in Paediatric Developmental Cataract Surgery . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):277.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To establish if there is a significant difference in the post operative mean spherical equivalent (MSE) and the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between primary or secondary intraocular lens implantation in paediatric developmental cataract surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all paediatric developmental cataracts (n=55) between 1997 to 2002 aged between 1 to 10 years was performed , in a city teaching hospital. Six month postoperative BCVA in logMAR and refractive error as MSE was recorded. Frequency distribution of results was performed and appropriate statistical analysis was carried out. Unpaired 2-tailed student t test was used to test significance for MSE, and Mann-Whitney U test was used to test significance for logMAR BCVA. Results: 36 eyes received primary lens implantation with a mean logMAR BCVA of 0.469 (20/50 Snellen equivalent), 19 eyes received secondary IOL with a mean logMAR BCVA of 0.535 (20/60) (p=0.978). Average MSE was 0.035D for primary IOL, and -0.51D for secondary IOL (p=0.107) Conclusions: There is no significant difference in postoperative refractive error and BCVA for primary or secondary lens implantation in paediatric developmental cataract surgery. Children may benefit from secondary lens implantation as it allows further time for maturation of the eye to accommodate an intraocular lens.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: out • small incision cataract surgery 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×