May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Antioxidant Protein 2 (aop2) Knockout Mice: Loss of Resistance to Heat and Oxidative Stress in Lens Epithelial Cells
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • N. Fatma
    Ophthalmology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
  • P. Sharma
    Center for Ophthalmic Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
  • E. Kubo
    Ophthalmology, Fukui Medical Institute, Fukui, Japan
  • D.A. Beier
    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
  • D.P. Singh
    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  N. Fatma, None; P. Sharma, None; E. Kubo, None; D.A. Beier, None; D.P. Singh, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  EY013394, FFS; GA01051
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 309. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      N. Fatma, P. Sharma, E. Kubo, D.A. Beier, D.P. Singh; Antioxidant Protein 2 (aop2) Knockout Mice: Loss of Resistance to Heat and Oxidative Stress in Lens Epithelial Cells . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):309.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Oxidative stress is a major risk factor for cataractogenesis. AOP2 is a lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF) – inducible protein that protects the cells from oxidative stress. However, role of AOP2 is not clear in lens. To this end, we utilized cultured lenses and lens epithelial cells (LECs) from normal and AOP2 knock out mice. We demonstrated the ability of AOP2 to protect eye lenses and/or LECs against oxidative and heat stresses. Methods: Lenses were removed from Aop+/+ and Aop-/-mice, and cell lines were generated as described previously (Singh et al. 1999). RT-PCR and western analysis were performed to validate the expression. Cells and/or lenses were subjected to either oxidative (10 - 200µM H2O2 for variable time periods), heat (42°C-45°C for 3-16 hrs) or serum depletion for a predefined period. MTS assay and Trypan blue exclusion test were used to assess cell viability, and TUNEL and DAPI staining to detect apoptotic cell death. Cells over expressing GFP-AOP2 and mutated GFP-AOP2 (C-47-I or S) were used to define the contribution of cysteine-47 (C-47). Histologic sections of lenses were examined after HE staining. Results: mLECs either from Aop2-/- or Aop2+/+ survived and grew well in DMEM+ 10% FCS. Aop-/- cells died after serum depletion (24hrs). Aop-/- cells were more susceptible to heat and oxidative stress and underwent apoptosis. C-47 of AOP2 was important as mutation abolished the protective effect of AOP2. Over-expressing AOP2 could confer the resistance against stress. Lenses from the Aop2-/- were more susceptible to H2O2 insults than Aop2+/+ and developed opacities in superficial cortex. Histology of Aop2-/- lenses was abnormal; LECs in the bow region had migrated into the posterior subcapsular space and denucleation was impaired. Conclusions: These results emphasize the importance of AOP2 in cellular defence against oxidative and heat stresses. Histological studies of lenses indicate the possible role of AOP2 in lens cell differentiation.

Keywords: antioxidants • apoptosis/cell death • cataract 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×