May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Understanding the Standard Algorithm for Corneal Refractive Surgery Using Laser Ablation of PMMA Surfaces
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. Dorronsoro
    Instituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
  • D. Cano
    Instituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
  • S. Barbero
    Instituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
  • J. Merayo
    Instituto de Oftalmobiología Aplicada, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
  • L. Llorente
    Instituto de Oftalmobiología Aplicada, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
  • S. Marcos
    Instituto de Oftalmobiología Aplicada, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C. Dorronsoro, None; D. Cano, None; S. Barbero, None; J. Merayo, None; L. Llorente, None; S. Marcos, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  CAM08.7/00100/2000 & MCyT BFM2002-02638 & CAM-Emory Vision, CSIC-Alconcusi, MECyD Fellowships
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 2535. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. Dorronsoro, D. Cano, S. Barbero, J. Merayo, L. Llorente, S. Marcos; Understanding the Standard Algorithm for Corneal Refractive Surgery Using Laser Ablation of PMMA Surfaces . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):2535.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Previous analytical and computational studies show that the Munnerlyn algorithm (the nominal laser ablation profile used in standard myopic corneal refractive procedures) should not induce the increased amounts of corneal asphericity found clinically after LASIK or PRK. Theoretically, prolate corneas should become more prolate, and oblate corneas should become more oblate. The current work further investigates the expected changes in corneal asphericity after laser ablation by stuying the ablation profiles on polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) surfaces. Methods: A narrow-beam flying spot excimer laser (Chiron Technolas 217-C-LASIK, Bausch&Lomb Surgical) provided with conventional software was used to ablate flat and spherical (radius from 7.5 to 8.6 mm) PMMA surfaces. Spherical corrections from –3 D to –12 D were applied, with optical zones from 5 to 7 mm. The topography of spherical surfaces was tested by videokeratoscopy prior to ablation. The ablation profile on flat surfaces was measured by contact profilometry. The change in asphericity after ablation of spherical surfaces was assessed by digital thickness gauge, and videokeratoscopy (with artificial tear coating). Results: The change in curvature induced by laser ablation on PMMA surfaces matched the observed change in curvature on real corneas, after application of a 3x correcting factor in ablation depth. There are not large discrepancies between the profile measured on flat surfaces and the Munnerlyn equation (0.02 µm RMS fitting errors). However, when the measured profile is computationally applied on aspheric corneas (both prolate and oblate), we found in all cases an increase in corneal asphericity (0.25 on average), contrary to theoretical predictions, but lower than the typical increase in asphericity found clinically (0.63 on average). The profile of ablated PMMA spherical surfaces shows a similar trend. Conclusions: (1) Minor discrepancies from the application of the Munnerlyn ablation algorithm can result in an increase of corneal asphericity (and consequent increase of spherical aberration). (2) The fact that real corneas still show larger increases in asphericity after ablation, compared to PMMA surfaces, is suggestive of additional biomechanical effects. (3) Understanding the ablation profiles on PMMA surfaces and how they compare to theoretical predictions and real outcomes is critical for improving corneal ablation algorithms.

Keywords: refractive surgery: optical quality • refractive surgery: corneal topography • physiological optics 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×