May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Confocal Microscopic Analysis of Epiretinal Membranes and Internal Limiting Membranes after Macular Surgey
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • F. Dubreuil
    Dept Ophthalmology III, Quinze-Vingts Natl Hosp. University of ParisVI, Paris, France
  • P. Lozato
    Dept Ophthalmology III, Quinze-Vingts Natl Hosp. University of ParisVI, Paris, France
  • M. Ullern
    Dept Ophthalmology III, Quinze-Vingts Natl Hosp. University of ParisVI, Paris, France
  • C. Baudouin
    Dept Ophthalmology III, Quinze-Vingts Natl Hosp. University of ParisVI, Paris, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  F. Dubreuil, None; P. Lozato, None; M. Ullern, None; C. Baudouin, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 3045. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      F. Dubreuil, P. Lozato, M. Ullern, C. Baudouin; Confocal Microscopic Analysis of Epiretinal Membranes and Internal Limiting Membranes after Macular Surgey . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):3045.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To study specimens obtained from macular surgery with confocal microscopy and compare the aspect of internal limiting membrane (ILM) of macular hole and of epiretinal membrane (ERM). Methods: This retrospective study included 32 patients undergoing surgery for epiretinal membrane (23 patients) or idiopathic macular hole (9 patients). Internal limiting membrane was removed in one or two times with the help of infracyanine green (ICG). Immunohistologic examination of the excised tissues was performed using confocal microscopy after labelling with antibodies to glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and vimentin. Results: Confocal microscopic analysis of epiretinal membranes enabled to identify three kinds of tissues: 17 ERMs that appeared thick, rich in cells, 17 ILMs, which were peeled secondly after staining with ICG, and 6 composite tissues, where ERM and ILM were removed at the same time. The 9 ILMs obtained from macular hole were quite similar to those removed in epiretinal membrane surgery. Both types appeared thin, wrinkled, and poor in cells. Nine ERMs and four ILMs contained GFAP-positive glial cells and a contingent of vimentin-positive cells. Conclusions: The confocal microscope offered a fast, three-dimensional analysis of ERMs and ILMs. Confocal microscopy did not reveal any obvious morphological difference between ILMs of ERM and ILMs of macular hole. Glial cells were only inconstantly found both in ERM and ILM specimens. Our findings suggest that glial cells may contribute to the pathogenesis of ERM and macular hole development.

Keywords: microscopy: confocal/tunneling • macular holes • retinal glia 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×