May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Factors Predicting a Successful Outcome of Vitrectomy for Diabetic Macular Edema
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M.P. Jones
    Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States
  • O. Oz
    Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States
  • M.A. Herion
    Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States
  • L. Akduman
    Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.P. Jones, None; O. Oz, None; M.A. Herion, None; L. Akduman, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 4024. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M.P. Jones, O. Oz, M.A. Herion, L. Akduman; Factors Predicting a Successful Outcome of Vitrectomy for Diabetic Macular Edema . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):4024.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To report factors predicting a successful outcome in the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema with vitrectomy. Methods: 20 eyes of 17 patients with diabetic macular edema and taut hyaloid that did not respond to laser photocoagulation underwent vitrectomy, peeling of the posterior hyaloid and interior limiting membrane if prominent. Predictive value of pre-operative factors such as CME, history of PRP, lens status, and insulin dependence were studied. Outcome measures were improvement of vision and resolution of macular edema. Results: The average pre-operative visual acuity was 20/372, with a median of 20/90. The average post-op visual acuity was 20/167 with a median of 20/85. Ten of the eyes (50%) showed post-op visual acuity improvement of ≥ 2 lines; 5 eyes (25%) showed no change and 5 eyes (25%) had worse visual acuity by ≥ 2 lines. None of the pre-operative variables studied, including presence of pre-op CME, insulin use, pre-op PRP, or phakia had any statistically significant effect on the outcomes of visual acuity or post-op macular edema. Conclusions: Among patients with resistant diabetic macular edema, factors such as the presence of pre-operative CME, the use of insulin, pre-operative PRP, or lens status did not have any statistically significant effects on post-operative visual acuity or macular edema.

Keywords: vitreoretinal surgery • diabetes • macula/fovea 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×