May 2003
Volume 44, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2003
Digitalized Evaluation of Endothelial Cells on Donor Corneas Using a Notebook-based Video System
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • U.C. Birk
    I, University Eye Clinic, Tuebingen, Germany
  • J. von Eicken
    I, University Eye Clinic, Tuebingen, Germany
  • O. Denk
    I, University Eye Clinic, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  U.C. Birk, None; J. von Eicken, None; O. Denk, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2003, Vol.44, 4709. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      U.C. Birk, J. von Eicken, O. Denk; Digitalized Evaluation of Endothelial Cells on Donor Corneas Using a Notebook-based Video System . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(13):4709.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Development and validation of a new approach to a digitalised endothelial cell evaluation of donor corneas using a notebook-based video system. Methods: Endothelial cells of ten porcine cornea were examined immediately after excision of the corneoscleral segment. After swelling of cell borders with hypotonic BSS solution, endothelial cells were visualized by a Nikon TS 100 phase contract microscope, detected by an analogue high-resolution video camera (BC-71), digitalized by an ADVC-100 converter and analyzed in a Sony VAIO Notebook using commercially available image analysis software. To validate the quality of endothelial cell evaluation, we checked the number of vital endothelial cells after trypan blue and alizarin red staining by light microscopy. All counts were performed on endothelial cells of 10 porcine corneas in triplicate. Results: Mean endothelial density of porcine corneas was determined to be 3597 ± 370 cells/mm2 when evaluated by phase contrast microscopy after swelling of cell borders with hypotonic BSS and 3913 ± 301 cells/mm2 when evaluated by vital staining using trypan blue and alizarin red. The difference was statistically significant when the data were analyzed with student's t-test (p=0.04). When cell counting of individual corneas was compared, in two cases cell counting performed by phase contrast microscopy resulted in higher endothelial cell densities when compared to cell counting after vital staining. Conclusions: Endothelial cell counting using phase contrast microscopy and a notebook-based video system resulted in lower endothelial cell densities when compared to cell counting after vital staining on average. However, since the risk to overestimate endothelial cell density with phase contrast microscopy is small, the notebook-based video system used in the present study is deemed to be valid enough to be used for routine cell counting in a cornea bank.

Keywords: cornea: storage • cornea: endothelium • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×