December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Normal Aging, Progression With Disease, And Test-Retest Variability In Erg Measures Of Cone And Rod Phototransduction
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • DG Birch
    Retina Foundation of the SW UT Southwestern Dallas TX
  • DC Hood
    Psychology Columbia University New York NY
  • KG Locke
    Retina Foundation of the SW Dallas TX
  • DR Hoffman
    Retina Foundation of the SW UT Southwestern Dallas TX
  • RT Tzekov
    Stanford University Palo Alto CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   D.G. Birch, None; D.C. Hood, None; K.G. Locke, None; D.R. Hoffman, None; R.T. Tzekov, None. Grant Identification: Support: NIH Grants EY05235, EY09076, Foundation Fighting Blindness, FDA Grant FD-R-001232
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 1770. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      DG Birch, DC Hood, KG Locke, DR Hoffman, RT Tzekov; Normal Aging, Progression With Disease, And Test-Retest Variability In Erg Measures Of Cone And Rod Phototransduction . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):1770.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine normal values for cone and rod phototransduction parameters derived from the a-wave of the electroretinogram (ERG), their dependence on age, the progression in rod parameters in patients with x-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP), and the test-retest variability of these a-wave measures compared to the variability in cone and rod b-wave measures. Methods: ERG responses to high-intensity stimuli were used to elicit rod-only and cone a-waves from 100 normal volunteers (5-75 yrs) and 20 patients with XLRP (5-38 yrs). Rod and cone phototransduction parameters were derived by computer-fitting physiologically-based computational models to the leading edges of a-wave ensembles. Results: Phototransduction efficiency, as indexed by S, decreased with age for both cone and rod-only responses, while maximum cone (cone RmP3) and rod (rod RmP3) photoresponses remained constant. In patients with XLRP followed for four years, rod RmP3 declined with disease progression, while rod S remained stable. The test-retest variability in cone and rod RmP3 is lower than previously-reported measures of the variability in cone- and rod-mediated peak-to-peak amplitudes. Conclusion: The leading edge of the a-wave of the ERG to high-intensity stimuli can be related to rod and cone phototransduction parameters through quantitative models. RmP3, rather than S, should be the outcome measure of choice when using the a-wave to follow photoreceptor function in prospective studies and/or treatment trials for retinal degeneration.

Keywords: 395 electroretinography: clinical • 562 retinal degenerations: hereditary • 517 photoreceptors 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×