December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
The Influence of Refractive Errors on mfERG Results
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S Bueltmann
    Department of Ophthalmology University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
  • P Weimer
    Department of Ophthalmology University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
  • K Rohrschneider
    Department of Ophthalmology University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   S. Bueltmann, None; P. Weimer, None; K. Rohrschneider, None. Grant Identification: DFG Ro 973/11-1
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 2011. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S Bueltmann, P Weimer, K Rohrschneider; The Influence of Refractive Errors on mfERG Results . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):2011.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the influence of refractive errors on results and interpretation of multifocal ERG results. Methods: 10 eyes of 5 normal subjects were examined with the RETIscan/CRT following pupil dilation. We used gold-foil electrodes as well as JET electrodes on a 103 hexagon test pattern for binocular testing. While one eye was optimized for refractive values, the other one was subject to testing with plus-lenses as well as cylinders up to 6dpt. After this, the refractive values were exchanged between the two eyes and retested. Objective refraction with JET electrodes was performed by retinoscopy. Results: While good results with central fixation were recorded in the control eyes, the artificial spherically myopic eyes showed a shift of fixation according to the pupillary distance (2 hexagons -70 mm). Astigmatic misrefraction resulted in less stable central fixation leading to a shift of P1 amplitudes from the center into periphery. We found a change in refraction for the JET electrodes that may also influence results. Conclusion: Assessment of good refractive values is important especially for binocular testing. This allows the best possible conditions for stable fixation when patients with central pathologies need to be diagnosed. Incorrect refractive compensation may lead to false results in healthy eyes and should be taken into account when the results are evaluated. Refractive values of JET electrodes may vary and are harder to measure with some common autorefractors.

Keywords: 395 electroretinography: clinical • 432 imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • 554 retina 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×