December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
The Photopic Negative Response of the White-on-White-Flash-Electroretinogram in Asymmetrical Glaucomas
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • N Wakili
    Dept Ophthalmology University Erlangen-Nurnberg Erlangen Germany
  • FK Horn
    Dept Ophthalmology University Erlangen-Nurnberg Erlangen Germany
  • AG M Jünemann
    Dept Ophthalmology University Erlangen-Nurnberg Erlangen Germany
  • M Korth
    Dept Ophthalmology University Erlangen-Nurnberg Erlangen Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   N. Wakili, None; F.K. Horn, None; A.G.M. Jünemann, None; M. Korth, None. Grant Identification: DFG (SFB539)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 2134. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      N Wakili, FK Horn, AG M Jünemann, M Korth; The Photopic Negative Response of the White-on-White-Flash-Electroretinogram in Asymmetrical Glaucomas . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):2134.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: The photopic negative response (PhNR) of the flash-electroretinogram has been shown to be reduced in human primary open angle glaucoma by using red flashes on a blue background (Viswanathan et al. 2001). This pilot study evaluates whether the PhNR of the flash-electroretinogram (ERG) with white flashes on a white background is affected by glaucomatous damage, too. Methods: ERG was performed in 10 patients aged 18-67 years with advanced asymmetrical glaucomas (1x angle-closure glaucoma, 2x primary open-angle glaucoma, 3x secondary open-angle glaucoma, 4x normaltension glaucoma). The interocular difference of perimetric defects (mean deviation) was ≷ 4dB between the two fellow eyes (white/white-perimetry, Octopus 500, G1-3). White flashes (xenon discharge tube, Ganzfeld stimulator) of increasing photopic luminance (1.47, 1.89, 2.09, 2.32, 2.58 and 3.33 log phot td s) were used on a white background (2,5 log phot td). The amplitudes of a-wave, b-wave and the PhNR for all flash intensities were compared interocularly using the paired-t-test. Correlations were computed between interocular differences of mean deviation and amplitudes of a-wave, b-wave and PhNR using Pearson`s correlation coefficient. Results: Amplitudes of the a-wave were significantly lower in the more damaged eyes only for the flash intensity 1.47 log phot td s. Amplitudes of the PhNR were significantly reduced in the more damaged eyes for the two flash intensities 1.47 and 2.09 log phot td s. There was no significant difference in amplitudes of b-waves between the two fellow eyes. The interocular differences in the mean deviation correlated significantly with the interocular differences in the a-wave amplitudes for flash intensities of 1.47, 1.89 and 2.09 log phot td s, and in the PhNR amplitudes for flash intensities of 1.47, 1.89, 2.09 and 2.32 log phot td s. Conclusion: The photopic negative response as well as the a-wave are significantly reduced in glaucomatous damage using the white-on-white-flash-electroretinogram.

Keywords: 395 electroretinography: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×