December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Failure to Obtain Hemifield Differences in the Discrimination of Spatial Parameters
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • MV Danilova
    Vision Physiology Lab IP Pavlov Inst of Physiology St Petersburg Russian Federation
  • JD Mollon
    Dept Exp Psychology Cambridge University Cambridge United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   M.V. Danilova, None; J.D. Mollon, None. Grant Identification: The Wellcome Trust 060651/Z/00/Z
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3910. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      MV Danilova, JD Mollon; Failure to Obtain Hemifield Differences in the Discrimination of Spatial Parameters . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3910.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: The two hemispheres of the human brain have different specialisations and it has often been held that these specialisations can be revealed by confining target stimuli to one or other visual hemifield. Our purpose was to test whether there do exist systematic hemifield differences in the discrimination of spatial frequency, of orientation, or of contrast. Method: In every case we presented two simultaneous Gabor patches (2 degrees in diameter) for 150 ms on each trial. The two stimuli always lay on an imaginary circle of radius 5 deg, centered on the fixation point. In the case of spatial frequency, we required the observer to report whether the more clockwise Gabor patch was of higher or lower spatial frequency than the less clockwise. In the case of orientation, we asked whether the more clockwise patch was the more tilted of the two and in the case of contrast, whether it was of higher or lower contrast. Left and right presentations were randomly intermixed, and the stimulus sequence also included trials on which one stimulus lay in one hemifield and one in the other. Several stimulus separations (2 - 8 degrees of visual angle) were tested and trials were blocked by separation. Two subjects were the authors; other subjects were naïve as to the purposes of the experiment. Results: There were no systematic right-left hemifield differences for any of the three attributes examined. Nor were thresholds systematically different according to whether the two stimuli fell in same or different hemifields. As previously reported, there was little effect of the separation of the stimuli. Conclusion: We were not able to demonstrate a left-hemifield advantage for discriminating spatial frequency, or orientation, or contrast. It is possible that the effects sometimes reported arise from attentional biases that are secondary to the primary task and that the present experiments more successfully ensured that the subject's attention was evenly distributed between hemifields.

Keywords: 586 spatial vision • 326 attention 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.