December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Contrast Sensitivity In The Primate Lateral Geniculate Nucleus Is Modulated By The Extraclassical Receptive Field
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • SG Solomon
    Dept Physiology University of Sydney Sydney Australia
  • EC Clark
    Dept Physiology University of Sydney Sydney Australia
  • PR Martin
    Dept Physiology University of Sydney Sydney Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   S.G. Solomon, None; E.C. Clark, None; P.R. Martin, None. Grant Identification: NHMRC Grant 107247
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3928. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      SG Solomon, EC Clark, PR Martin; Contrast Sensitivity In The Primate Lateral Geniculate Nucleus Is Modulated By The Extraclassical Receptive Field . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3928.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: The presence of an extraclassical receptive field (ECRF), termed the 'suppressive surround', has been demonstrated in lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) cells of primates and cats. Here we quantified the effects of ECRF stimulation on contrast-response properties in the magnocellular (MC), koniocellular (KC) and parvocellular (PC) layers of the LGN in a New World monkey, the marmoset Callithrix jacchus. Methods: extracellular recordings of single-unit activity were made in anaesthetised and paralyzed marmosets. The classical receptive field (CRF) was stimulated with a grating patch of optimal spatial frequency and radius 3-4 times that of the classical centre. The ECRF was stimulated with a contiguous annulus grating of variable contrast or orientation. Results: stimulation of the ECRF suppressed visually evoked activity. The contrast-response relationship of this inhibition parallels that of the CRF: for MC cells, threshold contrast for inhibition is close to 10% and saturates at 50% contrast. For PC cells, the contrast-relationship of inhibition was more linear. Contrast detection thresholds were determined by receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Detection thresholds were raised by ECRF stimulation for most units (30/34). Increasing ECRF contrast from 0% to 50% increased CRF threshold contrast for PC cells (from 29.2% to 36.7%, p < 0.02, paired Wilcoxin) and to a larger extent in MC cells (from 20.3%% to 63.7%, p < 0.02). Thresholds also increased for KC cells (from 15.0% to 38.1%, p=0.06). These effects were independent of annulus orientation. Conclusion: the ECRF of all primate LGN cells acts to reduce contrast sensitivity and the reliability of signal transmission. We suggest that the non-orientation tuned inhibition seen in the ECRF of cortical receptive fields is inherited from their subcortical inputs.

Keywords: 368 contrast sensitivity • 598 thalamus/lateral geniculate nucleus • 540 receptive fields 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.