September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016

Electron microscopy assessment of Descemet membrane interphase during DMEK graft preparation.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Javier Cabrerizo
    Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup and University of Copenhagen., Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Clara Rodriguez Aierbe
    Banco Vasco de Transfusiones y Tejidos, Galdacano, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Javier Cabrerizo, None; Clara Rodriguez Aierbe, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 1201. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Javier Cabrerizo, Clara Rodriguez Aierbe;
      Electron microscopy assessment of Descemet membrane interphase during DMEK graft preparation.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):1201.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose :
Graft preparation remains a challenging step of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Needing a learning curve itself, it adds surgical complexity to DMEK when compared with other techniques and may prevent the fast adoption of the technique by some groups. The aim of our study is to determine morphological microscopical characteristics of Descemet membrane interphase during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation.

Methods :
Five corneas, not eligible for clinical use were used in our study. DMEK graft preparation with specific set of instruments (Dorc, Scheijdelveweg, The Netherlands) was performed until the line of detachment reached the equator of the inner corneal curvature. The detached membrane was folded backwards, to enable a clear Descemet-stroma interphase, and the tissue was prepared for transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan).
The interphase was geographically categorized in central, mid-peripheral and peripheral. Images were taken in different areas of the interphase and morphological findings were classified in three categories, minor fibrotic adhesions, mayor bridge-like adhesions, and stromal ruptures.

Results :
Differences in number and morphology of stroma-Descemet adhesions were found between different areas of the Descemet membrane. Fibrotic linear adhesions were predominant in the center and mid periphery while larger bridge-like adhesions were predominantly found in the periphery. Correlation between the size of those adhesions and the presence of ruptures in the underlying stromal bed was found.

Conclusions :
Electron microscopy characterization of stromal-Descemet interphase shows morphological differences between central and peripheral areas of potential clinical relevance during DMEK preparation. Those differences may explain tissue behavior during graft preparation. A better understanding of the characteristics and prevalence of those adhesions may contribute for a more successful DMEK graft preparation.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

 

Peripheral Descemet-stroma interphase with several bridge-like adhesions.

Peripheral Descemet-stroma interphase with several bridge-like adhesions.

 

Close image of a bridge-like adhesion with underlying stromal rupture.

Close image of a bridge-like adhesion with underlying stromal rupture.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×