September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Performance in alternative tests of vision across the spectrum of glaucoma severity.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Stephanie Lin
    Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Aleksandra Mihailovic
    Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University/Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Sheila K West
    Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University/Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Chris A Johnson
    Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States
  • David S Friedman
    Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University/Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Pradeep Y Ramulu
    Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University/Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Stephanie Lin, None; Aleksandra Mihailovic, None; Sheila West, None; Chris Johnson, None; David Friedman, None; Pradeep Ramulu, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH R01 EY022976-01; Research to prevent blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 1971. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Stephanie Lin, Aleksandra Mihailovic, Sheila K West, Chris A Johnson, David S Friedman, Pradeep Y Ramulu; Performance in alternative tests of vision across the spectrum of glaucoma severity.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):1971.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Vision in glaucoma is most often tested using visual fields (VFs), visual acuity (VA), or contrast sensitivity (CS), though people with glaucoma may also experience other visual difficulties related to functional loss. Here, we determine how 3 alternative visual metrics vary with glaucoma severity (defined by VFs and the contrast sensitivity function [CSF], which integrates VA and CS results).

Methods : We analyzed data from 183 people age 57 and older with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma. Integrated VF (IVF) sensitivity was calculated from right and left eye 24-2 VFs. The qCSF test was used to measure area under the log CSF (AULCSF). Color vision and distance stereo acuity were evaluated with the HRR plates and Distance Randot Stereotest, respectively. Vision in noise, a measure of acuity tested on pixelated noise, was assessed with the Pelli Levi Dual Acuity Chart. Separate multivariate regression models evaluated associations between either IVF sensitivity or AULCSF and vision in noise, color vision, and stereo acuity, adjusting for age, gender, race, comorbidities, and medications.

Results : Subjects had a mean age of 70.6 (SD=7.6), IVF sensitivity of 26.1dB (IQR=25.1–29.7dB; normal value [NV]=33dB), and AULCSF of 1.2 (IQR=1.04–1.43; NV=1.6). Mean number of noisy letters read was 15.2 (IQR=13–19; NV not described) and mean color symbols seen 17.2 (IQR=18–20; NV=20). Most subjects (77%) had no detectable distance stereo acuity, while 6%, 8%, and 8% had 400, 200, and 60-100 seconds of arc, respectively. Each 5dB decrement in IVF sensitivity was associated with a 65% lower odds of having a higher level of stereo acuity (p<0.003), 2.2 fewer noisy letters read (p<0.001), and 2.9 fewer color symbols seen (p<0.001). Each 0.1 decrement in AULCSF was associated with a 40% lower odds of having a higher level of stereo acuity (p<0.001), 1.1 fewer noisy letters read (p<0.001), and 0.82 fewer color symbols seen (p<0.001). Correlations between IVF sensitivity and vision in noise, color vision, and stereo acuity were 0.54, 0.65, and 0.25, respectively.

Conclusions : Glaucoma influences a variety of visual metrics not typically assessed, including vision in noise, color vision, and stereo acuity. Given the moderate correlations between these and traditional vision metics, further work is required to determine what better reflects functional outcomes.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

 

Pelli Levi Dual Acuity Chart for vision in noise.

Pelli Levi Dual Acuity Chart for vision in noise.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×