September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Gender and Macular Status in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Cases
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rajit Banerjee
    Cincinnati Eye Insititute, Mason, Ohio, United States
  • Okan Toygar
    Cincinnati Eye Insititute, Mason, Ohio, United States
  • Brian Toussaint
    Cincinnati Eye Insititute, Mason, Ohio, United States
  • Brad Genereux
    Cincinnati Eye Insititute, Mason, Ohio, United States
  • Chris Riemann
    Cincinnati Eye Insititute, Mason, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Rajit Banerjee, None; Okan Toygar, None; Brian Toussaint, None; Brad Genereux, None; Chris Riemann, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 1052. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rajit Banerjee, Okan Toygar, Brian Toussaint, Brad Genereux, Chris Riemann; Gender and Macular Status in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Cases. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):1052.

      Download citation file:


      © 2017 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To assess if gender has an effect on macular status in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods : An IRB approved retrospective chart review was performed on 120 subjects that had undergone RRD repair from May-Aug., 2011. Data was extracted from electronic medical records. (Nextgen Healthcare Info. Sys.; Telford, PA). The data acquired for this study included patient demographics, information on retinal detachment procedure, macular status, risk factors, and clinical course. Chi-square analysis was performed based on observed and expected occurrences of macular status and gender for all subjects. In addition to gender and macular status, age, race, and location of operation were also tabulated.

Results : A total of 79 patients were mac-on and 41 patients were mac-off. Among 69 male patients, 24 were mac-off (34.8%) while among 51 female patients, 17 were mac-off (33.33%). The chi-square analysis showed that there were no significant gender differences (p = 0.87) between male and female mac-off patients. There was also a very minor increased risk (1.04) of having a mac off RD for a male presentation (p = 0.87).

Conclusions : This pilot study suggests that the macular status of patients with RRD may not be affected by gender as there was no statistical significant difference. There was also no significant risk associated with presenting with a mac off RD based on the gender of patient presentation. The patient population is limited and should be increased to improve the statistical power of this study.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

 

Table 1: Observed occurrences of macular status with respect to gender (p = 0.87).

Table 1: Observed occurrences of macular status with respect to gender (p = 0.87).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×