September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Visual quality with combinations of optimized and non-optimized corrective elements
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Georgios Zoulinakis
    Faculty of Physics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Burjassot, Spain
  • Robert Montés-Micó
    Faculty of Physics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Burjassot, Spain
  • Teresa Ferrer Blasco
    Faculty of Physics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Burjassot, Spain
  • D Robert Iskander
    Wroclaw University of Technology, Wroclaw, Poland
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Georgios Zoulinakis, None; Robert Montés-Micó, None; Teresa Ferrer Blasco, None; D Robert Iskander, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Marie Curie Grant FP7-LIFE-ITN-2013-608049-AGEYE
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 3114. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Georgios Zoulinakis, Robert Montés-Micó, Teresa Ferrer Blasco, D Robert Iskander; Visual quality with combinations of optimized and non-optimized corrective elements. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):3114.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To simulate and compare visual quality between combinations of optimized and non-optimized monofocal intraocular (IOL) and contact lenses (CL).

Methods : Raw height data of corneal topographies acquired with Medmont E300 Corneal Topographer were used. They included measurements of 10 regular and 12 astigmatic (> 0.75 D) corneas. The data were fitted with a series of Zernike polynomials of the 8th radial order and input in Zemax-EE optical design program (Zemax, LLC). First, 22 customized Liou-Brennan eye models with the first corneal surface replaced with the real corneal data and a pupil size of 3 mm were designed. Then, the crystalline lens was then replaced with either optimized or non-optimized monofocal IOLs. To these models were also added optimized or non-optimized monofocal contact lenses. IOLs and CLs were designed for far focus distance (>6 m). The term optimized stands for lenses which were designed to minimize the wavefront root mean square (RMS) error, while the term non-optimized stands for lenses which have rounded dioptric powers with steps of 0.25 D. To assess the design, wavefront RMS and the visual Strehl ratio based on the optical transfer function (VSOTF) were utilized.

Results : The results were separated between regular and astigmatic corneas and were statistically analyzed. Figure 1 shows the VSOTF and the wavefront RMS for the regular corneas. Paired t-tests between groups with optimized and non-optimized elements showed no statistically significant difference between groups with optimized and non-optimized IOLs (p=0.450). Statistically significant increase was found in VSOTF between groups with optimized IOLs and with either optimized (p<0.001) or non-optimized IOL and CL combinations (p<0.001). There was also a statistically significant decrease of the VSOTF between combinations of optimized and non-optimized IOLs and CLs (p=0.004). Similar results were found in the group of astigmatic corneas.

Conclusions : A combination of two lenses offers a better optical quality, instead of using one fully optimized lens. The combination of two non-optimized lenses offers decreased optical quality from a combination of fully optimized lenses but that decrease amounts on average to less than 0.1 logMAR.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

 

Figure 1 VSOTF and wavefront RMS results. IOL stands for intraocular lens, IOL&CL stands for intraocular and contact lens, opt stands for optimized and non opt stands for non-optimized lenses.

Figure 1 VSOTF and wavefront RMS results. IOL stands for intraocular lens, IOL&CL stands for intraocular and contact lens, opt stands for optimized and non opt stands for non-optimized lenses.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×