September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Asymmetric retinal thinning after epiretinal membrane peel
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Peter M Kally
    David Geffen School of Medicine, Ventura, California, United States
    Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Tara A McCannel
    Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Colin McCannel
    Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Peter Kally, None; Tara McCannel, None; Colin McCannel, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 1064. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Peter M Kally, Tara A McCannel, Colin McCannel; Asymmetric retinal thinning after epiretinal membrane peel. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):1064.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate macular changes following vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling for macular pucker. This retrospective case-control study was designed to examine the operative and long-term effects of ERM peel operations on macular structure.

Methods : Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval obtained for patients with idiopathic ERMs who received a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and ERM peel between 2010 and 2015. Major inclusion criteria were availability of Heidelberg optical coherence tomography (OCT) images before and after epiretinal membrane peeling and pseudophakia at last follow up. Exclusion criteria were based on presence of any retinal or ocular co-morbidity that would affect visual acuity independent from the ERM. A total of 47 control eyes were selected from the fellow non-operated eyes as long as no ocular morbidity was present, including epiretinal membranes. Data collected on preoperative and follow-up clinic visits included macular subfield thickness, foveal distance from optic nerve, pseudophakic status and concurrent use of indocyanine green (ICG) and inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during surgery. Results were examined with two-tailed Student’s t-testing, a p-value <0.05 was used for statistical significance.

Results : A total of 52 cases and 47 controls met all inclusion and exclusion criteria and were studied. The average follow-up was 27 months (range 7-44 months). Mean pre-operative temporal subfield thickness (TST) = 418.9nm (SD ± 61.8), and nasal subfield thickness (NST) = 430.2nm (SD ± 53.0), decreasing on follow-up TST = 339.1nm (SD ± 41.2) and NST = 374.0 (SD ± 35.0). The difference between the change in TST and NST was significant (p = <0.001). There was no significant difference in nasal or temporal subfield changes when the operative eyes were stratified by use of ICG (n=12), or ILM peeling (n=15). Foveal distance from optic nerve did not change significantly on follow-up p=0.602.

Conclusions : Following vitrectomy with ERM peeling there is a greater reduction in the temporal retinal subfield thickness than than nasal retinal subfield. Intraoperative use of ICG and ILM peeling did not appear to affect the amount of thinning measured. There was no change in foveal location relative to optic nerve detected.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×