September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Validation of Catquest-9SF – A Visual Disability Instrument for Corneal Transplantation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Margareta Claesson
    Ophthalmology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
  • John Armitage
    Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Mats Lundström
    Ophthalmology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Margareta Claesson, None; John Armitage, None; Mats Lundström, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 1225. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Margareta Claesson, John Armitage, Mats Lundström; Validation of Catquest-9SF – A Visual Disability Instrument for Corneal Transplantation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):1225.

      Download citation file:


      © 2017 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To apply and validate a visual disability questionnaire, Catquest-9SF, using Rasch analysis, in order to optimize item fit to the construct, minimize test length and create a linear measure of visual disability in patients before and after corneal transplantation.

Methods : A group of patients (n=398) who were in the Swedish Cornea Registry, completed the Catquest -9SF questionnaire. 199 completed the questionnaire before their corneal transplant. The remaining patients (n=199), separate from the first group in order to maintain independence within the validation data set, submitted the questionnaire 2 years after their transplant. The Catquest-9SF contains 7 visual disability items and 2 global assessment items. The fit of these 9 items to a single construct was assessed with Rasch analysis using Winsteps 3.91.0 applied with an Andrich rating scale for each question type.

Results : The existing response scale thresholds were ordered for all items. 68.5% of the variance was explained showing that the instrument measures a single underlying construct. The instrument distinguished well between different levels of participants’ ability (person separation 3.09, person reliability 0.91). All items fit the Rasch model expectation (infit and outfit mean squares between 0.7 and 1.3). Differential item functioning (DIF) showed that the level of response ability for only one item, satisfaction with vision, differed before and after surgery (1.08 logits). Finally, targeting showed that the item difficulty matched the level of the participants’ visual ability (<1 logit).

Conclusions : We have used Catquest-9SF, previously validated for cataract surgery, to quantify the visual disability of patients before and after corneal transplantation. The level of response ability of patients before and after transplantation differed only slightly for one item, satisfaction with vision. This is understandable given the poorer vision before transplantation. Catquest-9SF applied to corneal transplant patients therefore fits the Rasch model extremely well and can be used to assess change in visual disability after corneal transplantation.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×