September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Masked Assessment of Widefield En Face Swept Source OCT Imaging Versus Color, Autofluorescence, and Infrared Fundus Imaging for the Diagnosis of Reticular Pseudodrusen
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Karen B Schaal
    Ophthalmic Research, Basom Palmer Eye Institute, Key Biscayne, Florida, United States
  • Andrew Dominic Legarreta
    Ophthalmic Research, Basom Palmer Eye Institute, Key Biscayne, Florida, United States
  • William J Feuer
    Biostatistics, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Giovanni Gregori
    Ophthalmic Research, Basom Palmer Eye Institute, Key Biscayne, Florida, United States
  • Qianqian Cheng
    Ophthalmic Research, Basom Palmer Eye Institute, Key Biscayne, Florida, United States
  • John Edward Legarreta
    Ophthalmic Research, Basom Palmer Eye Institute, Key Biscayne, Florida, United States
  • Paul F Stetson
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, United States
  • Sophie Kubach
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, United States
  • Philip J Rosenfeld
    Ophthalmic Research, Basom Palmer Eye Institute, Key Biscayne, Florida, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Karen Schaal, None; Andrew Legarreta, None; William Feuer, None; Giovanni Gregori, Carl Zeiss Meditec (P); Qianqian Cheng, None; John Legarreta, None; Paul Stetson, Carl Zeiss Meditec (E); Sophie Kubach, Carl Zeiss Meditec (E); Philip Rosenfeld, Carl Zeiss Meditec (F), Carl Zeiss Meditec (R)
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 1609. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Karen B Schaal, Andrew Dominic Legarreta, William J Feuer, Giovanni Gregori, Qianqian Cheng, John Edward Legarreta, Paul F Stetson, Sophie Kubach, Philip J Rosenfeld; Masked Assessment of Widefield En Face Swept Source OCT Imaging Versus Color, Autofluorescence, and Infrared Fundus Imaging for the Diagnosis of Reticular Pseudodrusen. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):1609.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare 12X12mm widefield en face swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) imaging with conventional color, autofluorescence, and infrared imaging for the detection of reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) in eyes with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods : Patients with dry AMD were prospectively enrolled in an OCT imaging study at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. On the same day, all patients underwent color fundus imaging, fundus autofluorescence imaging, infrared reflectance imaging, and imaging with a prototype Zeiss 100kHz SS-OCT instrument (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA) with a central wavelength of 1050nm. Two masked graders assessed the presence, absence, or uncertainty of RPD on the conventional images and separately on four different SS-OCT en face images. The four OCT images were the OCT fundus image (OFI), a sub-RPE slab image, and two 20 µm thick outer retinal slabs positioned 35-55 µm and 20-40 µm above the RPE. The OCT fundus image (OFI) and sub-RPE slab image were used to assess the presence of geographic atrophy, the outer retinal slab images were used to assess the presence of subretinal drusenoid deposits. The grading results between conventional imaging and SS-OCT en face imaging were compared, and questionable RPD cases were defined as absent RPD to simplify analysis. Since RPD could be detected using both imaging modalities, it was decided that the gold standard for the presence of RPD grading would be a positive reading with either SS-OCT or conventional imaging.

Results : A total of 307 eyes (209 patients) were graded for the presence or absence of RPD based on SS-OCT and conventional imaging. The agreement between SS-OCT and multimodal imaging was 83%. The difference in RPD detection with either image modality was not statistically significant (p=0.21). The sensitivity of SS-OCT in RPD detection was 83%, and when using conventional imaging, the sensitivity was 75%. When using SS-OCT imaging alone, 10% of RPD cases would be missed, and when using conventional imaging alone, 14% or RPD cases would be missed.

Conclusions : All four imaging modalities used together provided the best strategy for the detection of RPD. However, when using widefield en face SS-OCT slab imaging alone, the detection of RPD was at least as good as conventional imaging.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×