September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Ocular biometric parameters variation between closed and opened angles in Thai population
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kulawan Rojananuangnit
    Ophthalmology, Mettapracharak(Wat Rai Khing) hospital, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
  • Panidaporn Salyapongse
    Ophthalmology, Mettapracharak(Wat Rai Khing) hospital, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Kulawan Rojananuangnit, None; Panidaporn Salyapongse, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 3388. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kulawan Rojananuangnit, Panidaporn Salyapongse; Ocular biometric parameters variation between closed and opened angles in Thai population. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):3388.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare the ocular biometric parameters between closed angle and opened angle by using anterior segment OCT

Methods : This was a cross sectional descriptive study. We enrolled normal, glaucoma suspected and glaucoma participants with visual acuity better than 20/70, refraction ± 6 diopters and astigmatism ± 3 diopters and excluded secondary causes of glaucoma. All consented participants were completely performed eye examination and measured the following ocular biometric parameters including, axial length, central corneal thickness, gonioscopy and Visante®anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Linear regression model was used to test the differences between groups.

Results : Two-hundred twenty three opened angle eyes (112 participants) and 50 closed angle eyes (25 participants) were recruited. The mean age of closed group was significant older than opened group, 63.58 ± 9.06 versus 56.75 ± 13.39 years (p=0.022). Refraction between 2 groups were similar; however, the axial length were significant longer in the opened group; 23.49 ± 0.93 mm versus 22.56 ± 0.92 mm (p<0.05). Intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness were eqivalence. All anterior segment parameters in both nasal and temporal sided of opened group were higher including; anterior chamber depth (ACD) 2.92 ± 0.56mm versus 2.41 ± 0.73mm, p<0.001; temporal angle opening distance 500 μm (AOD500) 0.78 ± 0.33 mm versus 0.5 ± 0.19 mm, p<0.001; nasal AOD500 0.64 ± 0.23mm versus 0.42 ± 0.15 mm, p<0.001; temporal AOD750 0.97 ± 0.36 mm versus 0.67 ± 0.25mm, p<0.001; nasal AOD750 0.81 ± 0.25 mm versus 0.54 ± 0.16mm, p<0.001; temporal trabecular–iris space area 500 μm(TISA500) 0.31 ± 0.15mm2 versus 0.19 ± 0.08mm2, p<0.001; nasal TISA500 0.24 ± 0.1mm2 versus 0.16 ± 0.06mm2, p<0.001; temporal TISA750 0.53 ± 0.23mm2 versus 0.34 ± 0.13mm2, p<0.001; nasal TISA750 0.42 ± 0.15mm2 versus 0.27 ± 0.09mm2, p<0.001; temporal scleral spur angle 54.39 ± 10.52 degree versus 43.35 ± 10.97 degree, p<0.001; nasal scleral spur angle 49.34 ± 10.25 degree versus 38.06 ± 9.4 degree, p<0.001.

Conclusions : Our study provided anterior segment parameters of opened and closed angle in Thai population which can consider as the normative reference.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×