September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Comparison of two strategies to calculate perimetric sensitivity with the Compass perimeter.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Luca Rossetti
    Dipartimento Testa-Collo, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milano, MI, Italy
  • Paolo Fogagnolo
    Dipartimento Testa-Collo, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milano, MI, Italy
  • Maurizio Digiuni
    Dipartimento Testa-Collo, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milano, MI, Italy
  • Antonio Modarelli
    Dipartimento Testa-Collo, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milano, MI, Italy
  • Giovanni Montesano
    Dipartimento Testa-Collo, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milano, MI, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Luca Rossetti, CenterVue (C); Paolo Fogagnolo, CenterVue (C); Maurizio Digiuni, None; Antonio Modarelli, None; Giovanni Montesano, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 3933. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Luca Rossetti, Paolo Fogagnolo, Maurizio Digiuni, Antonio Modarelli, Giovanni Montesano; Comparison of two strategies to calculate perimetric sensitivity with the Compass perimeter.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):3933.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare ZEST (Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing) vs 4-2 strategies for Compass Fundus Automated Perimetry (FAP, CenterVue, Padova, Italy).

Methods : 18 helthy subjects and 15 glaucoma patients were enrolled. They received 3 perimetric tests with the two strategies on one eye chosen at random using FAP. The following test order was used: 4-2, ZEST, 4- 2.

Results : The difference in mean sensitivity (4-2 vs ZEST) was -0.9 dB. Test duration with ZEST was 353 ± 31 sec on healthy subjects (6.4 sec/location) and 343 ± 67 sec on glaucoma patients (6.2 sec/location).

Conclusions : Mean sensitivity with ZEST is comparable with 4-2, being about 1 dB higher. A similar finding is found in the literature between full-threshold and SITA programs with Humphrey. Mean duration with ZEST is nearly halved compared with previously published data on FAP 4-2. These preliminary data suggest that ZEST strategy can improve FAP clinical use.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×