September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Global refraction and aberration profiles with single-vision and multifocal contact lenses.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ravi Chandra Bakaraju
    Brien Holden Vision Insititue, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    School of Optometry and Vision science, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Cathleen Fedtke
    Brien Holden Vision Insititue, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Jiyoon Chung
    Brien Holden Vision Insititue, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Darrin Falk
    Brien Holden Vision Insititue, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Klaus Ehrmann
    Brien Holden Vision Insititue, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    School of Optometry and Vision science, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Ravi Bakaraju, Brien Holden Vision Insititue (E); Cathleen Fedtke, Brien Holden Vision Insititue (E), Brien Holden Vision Insititue (P); Jiyoon Chung, Brien Holden Vision Insititue (E); Darrin Falk, Brien Holden Vision Insititue (E), Brien Holden Vision Insititue (P); Klaus Ehrmann, Brien Holden Vision Insititue (E), Brien Holden Vision Insititue (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 6252. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ravi Chandra Bakaraju, Cathleen Fedtke, Jiyoon Chung, Darrin Falk, Klaus Ehrmann; Global refraction and aberration profiles with single-vision and multifocal contact lenses.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):6252.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the effects of single-vision (SV) & multifocal (MF) contact lenses (CL) on the horizontal (H), oblique (O) & vertical (V) peripheral refraction (PR) & aberration profiles.

Methods : Forty myopic participants [24.2 yr ± 2.4, 65% F, SE:-0.5 to -4.5D] were fitted randomly with the following lenses: 6 SV’s [AirOptix, Biofinity, Clariti, Proclear, Night & Day and Oasys] and 9 MF’s [Acuvue bifocal, AirOptix, Purevision in low & high adds and MiSight]. The PR profiles across H, O and V meridians, spanning visual field angles from -50° to +50° in 10° steps, were measured with BHVI-EyeMapper, for all lens types at +1D and -3D target vergences. Four repeats were performed with fellow eye occluded. Analysis was done at 4mm pupil. Relative PR (RPR) are reported.

Results : At +1D vergence, with exception of Night & Day SV (M=-0.31D), all SVCLs produced a hyperopic shift in H-RPR; Biofinity SV produced the steepest drift (M=0.27D). The RPRs remained myopic for all SVCLs in the O & V meridians, where Night & Day SV produced greatest (M=-0.52D) and Biofinity produced the least myopic shift (M=-0.16D). All MFCLs, except MiSight (M=-0.89D), produced hyperopic shifts in the H, O and V meridians (M range 0.06 to 0.44D). In all meridians, the RPR patterns observed at +1D vergence were maintained at -3D target vergence. Regardless of the lens type or accommodative state, J0 and J45 became increasingly more negative for the H & O meridians, respectively. Along the V meridian, J0 became increasingly more positive as a function of field eccentricity. In H & V meridians, magnitude of J45 was relatively insignificant. All lenses measured negative spherical aberration (range: -0.004 to -0.098µm), on-axis, except MiSight and Night & Day which measured positive spherical aberration (range: 0.02 to 0.086µm).

Conclusions : In the H meridian, only Night & Day SV and MiSight produced peripheral myopic shifts. Remaining lenses produced low to moderate levels of peripheral hyperopia (PH). In the O & V meridians, as the baseline RPR profiles were already in the myopic direction, none of the test lenses produced significant levels of PH. In the light of PH theory, we speculate that some lenses that reduced PH in the H meridian may offer a therapeutic benefit. However, whether myopic defocus in the O & V meridians (at baseline & with most test lenses) can offer a stop signal to myopia progression needs further investigation.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×