June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
In vivo measurement of regional corneal stiffness
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Andrew KC Lam
    School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
  • Ying Hon
    School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
  • Shu-Hao Lu
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
  • Guo-Zhen Chen
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
  • David C.C. Lam
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Andrew Lam, None; Ying Hon, None; Shu-Hao Lu, None; Guo-Zhen Chen, None; David Lam, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 4330. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Andrew KC Lam, Ying Hon, Shu-Hao Lu, Guo-Zhen Chen, David C.C. Lam; In vivo measurement of regional corneal stiffness. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):4330.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To measure corneal stiffness at central and peripheral regions and to study effect from direction of gaze during peripheral measurement

Methods : Twenty-five young Chinese subjects (age, 21-26 years) had corneal stiffness measured using a corneal indentation device. It consisted of a 2-mm diameter indenter to measure the force required to indent at a 1-mm depth. Measurements were obtained randomly at the central cornea and 3mm from the temporal limbus. For temporal measurement, subjects maintained a primary fixation position and fixating 60-degree nasally. Corneal thickness at the center (CCT) and temporal (TCT) region were measured using swept-source anterior optical coherence tomography.

Results : No significant between-eye difference in corneal thickness and corneal stiffness was found. Results from right eye were used for analysis. The mean central corneal stiffness was 0.070 (+/- 0.0065) N/mm. The mean temporal corneal stiffness was 0.074 (+/- 0.0074) N/mm at primary gaze, and 0.080 (+/- 0.0067) N/mm when looking nasally. Repeated measures ANOVA showed significant difference of the three results (F = 21.36, p < 0.001). Post hoc test revealed significant difference between central corneal stiffness and temporal corneal stiffness at primary fixation (p < 0.024). Since TCT was significantly thicker than CCT (paired t-test, t = -26.78, p < 0.001), corneal thickness difference at the two regions was set as covariate. The difference in corneal stiffness between the two regions was no longer significant (p = 0.692). Central corneal stiffness was positively associated with CCT (r = 0.48, p = 0.016), but correlation between temporal stiffness and temporal thickness was not significant (r = 0.23, p = 0.28). Post hoc test also revealed significant difference in temporal corneal stiffness at different direction of gaze (p < 0.007).

Conclusions : We demonstrated in vivo corneal stiffness measurement at different locations. A stiffer temporal cornea was due to its increased corneal thickness. However, there should be factors other than corneal thickness affecting peripheral corneal stiffness. Practitioner should be aware of effect from direction of gaze in peripheral corneal stiffness measurement.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

 

Figure 1. Photographs of the corneal indentation device sitting on a slit-lamp unit.

Figure 1. Photographs of the corneal indentation device sitting on a slit-lamp unit.

 

Figure 2. a) A schematic diagram illustrates stiffness measurement at central cornea; b) at temporal cornea in primary gaze; c) at temporal cornea in nasal fixation.

Figure 2. a) A schematic diagram illustrates stiffness measurement at central cornea; b) at temporal cornea in primary gaze; c) at temporal cornea in nasal fixation.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×