June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Outcomes of Phacoemulsification Vs Combined Phacoemulsification and iStent Implant in Glaucomatous Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kevin Lodewyk
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Nariman Nassiri
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Chaesik Kim
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Anju Goyal
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Justin Tannir
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Aman Shukairy
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Mark S Juzych
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Bret A Hughes
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Kevin Lodewyk, None; Nariman Nassiri, None; Chaesik Kim, None; Anju Goyal, None; Justin Tannir, None; Aman Shukairy, None; Mark Juzych, None; Bret Hughes, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 4925. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kevin Lodewyk, Nariman Nassiri, Chaesik Kim, Anju Goyal, Justin Tannir, Aman Shukairy, Mark S Juzych, Bret A Hughes; Outcomes of Phacoemulsification Vs Combined Phacoemulsification and iStent Implant in Glaucomatous Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):4925.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The iStent has gained popularity in the treatment of mild to moderate glaucoma. In this retrospective longitudinal study, we aimed to investigate 18-month outcomes of phacoemulsification with or without combined iStent implantation in glaucoma patients.

Methods : We included glaucoma patients who underwent phacoemulsification with or without combined iStent implantation at Kresge Eye Institute from April 2007 to July 2016. Two groups were compared at baseline and different intervals with regard to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), number of IOP-lowering medications (Table 1). Chi square and t test were used to compare the study outcomes between two groups. P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results : The two groups were comparable with regard to age, gender, race, diabetes, hypertension, BCVA, number of IOP-lowering medications and severity of glaucoma based on mean deviation (MD) at baseline (p > 0.05; Table 1). The combined group had statistically higher baseline IOP compared to the phacoemulsification group (17.5 ± 5.1 vs.15.8 ± 4.2, respectively; p=0.006; Table 1). While BCVA and IOP were comparable between groups, eyes in the combined group required significantly less IOP-lowering medications during all follow-up visits (p<0.001; Table 2). Compared to baseline, IOP and number of medications significantly reduced from 15.8 ± 4.2 and 1.41 ± 0.95 at baseline to 15.72 ± 3.37 (p=0.006) and 0.28 ± 0.69 (p<0.001) at 12 months and 15.44 ± 4.21 (p=0.01) and 0.51 ± 0.82 (p<0.001) at 18 months in the combined group (Table 2). Compared to baseline, IOP statistically reduced to 14.29 ± 3.63 (p=0.02) at 12 months and 14.05 ± 3.23 (p=0.02) at 18 months in the phacoemulsification group; however, the number of medications did not show any significant difference at 12 and 18 months (p>0.05 for both; Table 2).

Conclusions : While two groups were comparable with regard to BCVA and IOP, eyes in the combined group required less IOP-lowering medications during 18 months of follow up. Compared to baseline, IOP significantly reduced 12 and 18 months after surgery in both groups while number of medication only reduced in the combined group.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

 

Baseline characteristics in phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification and iStent groups.

Baseline characteristics in phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification and iStent groups.

 

Comparison of study outcomes in phacoemulsification and phacoemulsification with iStent study groups over 18 month follow-up.

Comparison of study outcomes in phacoemulsification and phacoemulsification with iStent study groups over 18 month follow-up.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×