June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Spherical aberration of the eye during accommodation in downward gaze over time in emmetropes and myopes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Atanu Ghosh
    Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Michael J Collins
    Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Scott A Read
    Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Brett A Davis
    Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Atanu Ghosh, None; Michael Collins, None; Scott Read, None; Brett Davis, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 2060. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Atanu Ghosh, Michael J Collins, Scott A Read, Brett A Davis; Spherical aberration of the eye during accommodation in downward gaze over time in emmetropes and myopes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):2060.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : While a range of previous studies have investigated the changes in ocular aberrations during accommodation in primary gaze for a fixed pupil diameter at a single time point, there has been less attention on how the eye’s optics change over time with a sustained period of near work in downward gaze for natural pupils. Therefore, the current study investigated the changes in the optics of the eye during accommodation in downward gaze over 10-min duration.

Methods : Twenty six young adult subjects (14 myopes, 12 emmetropes) were recruited for this study. A Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor was modified to measure the optics of the eye in downward gaze with different levels of accommodation. Baseline measures were obtained after subjects performed a control task (watching TV at 5 m distance in primary gaze) for 10 mins prior to each of three testing conditions. These three conditions included, distance accommodation in downward gaze, 2.5 D accommodation in downward gaze and 5 D accommodation in downward gaze. Measurements of ocular aberrations were taken immediately and then at 5 and 10 minutes from the commencement of each trial and Seidel longitudinal spherical aberration was derived.

Results : Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant influence of accommodation stimulus (p<0.001) on the changes in spherical aberration, and the longitudinal spherical aberration was significantly more negative in myopes (–1.08 ± 0.86 D) than emmetropes (–0.25 ± 0.73 D) after 10-min of the 5 D accommodation task (p<0.05). There was also a significant interaction between accommodation error (lag) and pupil size over time (p<0.001) and this interaction accounted for some of the changes in spherical aberration.

Conclusions : A change occurred over time in spherical aberration during the near task in downward gaze when measured with natural pupils. Myopes showed greater changes in the higher-order optics than emmetropes over 10-min when performing a near task in downward gaze. These findings provide a more realistic reflection of the eye’s natural optical properties during typical near tasks.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

 

Dioptric values of group mean (±SD) longitudinal spherical aberration during distance and near accommodation in downward gaze over 10-min for natural pupil diameters among emmetropes and myopes. Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference between myopes and emmetropes (p<0.05).

Dioptric values of group mean (±SD) longitudinal spherical aberration during distance and near accommodation in downward gaze over 10-min for natural pupil diameters among emmetropes and myopes. Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference between myopes and emmetropes (p<0.05).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×