June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
COMPARISON OF EPLERENONE VERSUS MELATONIN AS THERAPEUTIC OPTIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Eleonora Beatriz Lavaque
    Dpto de Retina , Hospital Oftalmológico Santa Lucía, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Laura Gramajo
    Centro Privado de Ojos Romagosa SA , Cordoba, Argentina
    Fundación VER, Córdoba, Argentina
  • Juan Pablo Real
    Dpto. Farmacia, Fac. Cs. Qcas, UNC, Córdoba, Argentina
    UNITEFA (CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina
  • Claudio P Juarez
    Centro Privado de Ojos Romagosa SA , Cordoba, Argentina
    Fundación VER, Córdoba, Argentina
  • Ruth Estela Rosenstein
    Dpto de Bioquímica Humana. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
    CEFyBO, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Jose D Luna Pinto
    Centro Privado de Ojos Romagosa SA , Cordoba, Argentina
    Fundación VER, Córdoba, Argentina
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Eleonora Lavaque, None; Laura Gramajo, None; Juan Pablo Real, None; Claudio Juarez, None; Ruth Rosenstein, None; Jose Luna Pinto, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 5932. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Eleonora Beatriz Lavaque, Laura Gramajo, Juan Pablo Real, Claudio P Juarez, Ruth Estela Rosenstein, Jose D Luna Pinto; COMPARISON OF EPLERENONE VERSUS MELATONIN AS THERAPEUTIC OPTIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):5932.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : At present, there are no optimal therapies for chronic CSCR (central serous chorioretinopathy). Epleronone and melatonin are two of the many therapeutic option described for the treatment of disease. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of melatonin and eplerenone for the treatment of chronic CSCR.

Methods : Comparative, retrospective study. A total of 35 patients with chronic CSCR were treated: 20 patients were treated with 50 mg/day of oral eplerenone for 3 months, 10 patients were treated orally with 3 mg melatonin t.i.d for 1 month, and 5 patient were treated with placebo. All patients had 20/40 or worse Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the affected eye or presented an incapacitating scotoma. Most of the patients had previous failed treatments for their condition. Observational procedures included ETDRS BCVA, and complete ophthalmic examination. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) was performed at day 1 and week 4.

Results : At one month follow up, CMT (central macular thickness) showed a significant decrease (P < 0.005) on both treatment groups, but change in macular thickness was significantly lower in the eplerenone group (P > 0.05 at 1 and 3 months). The mean decreased on CMT at 1 month was -43.9 µm and -146.5 µm for the eplerenone and melatonin groups respectively. These numbers were maintained at month 3.In terms of BCVA, both groups of treatment showed a mean significant improvement on visual acuity at one month, without significant differences between groups. No changes on BCVA or CMT were noted in the control group. No significant side effects were observed in any of the treatment groups.

Conclusions : Melatonin and eplerenone can be considered equally effective in improving BCVA on patients with chronic CSCR, although melatonin is statistically superior in promoting the reabsorption of SRF (subretinal fluid).

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×