June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Assessment of pre-trial bevacizumab response in the REACT study: A prospective comparative dosing trial of ranibizumab in eyes previously treated with bevacizumab.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • sruthi arepalli
    Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Sunil K Srivastava
    Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Rishi P Singh
    Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Alex Yuan
    Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Jonathan E Sears
    Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Jamie Reese
    Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Stiegel Laura
    Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Justis Ehlers
    Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   sruthi arepalli, None; Sunil Srivastava, alcon (C), bausch and lomb (C), Bausch and lomb (P), bioptigen (P), leica (P), santen (C), synergetics (P), zeiss (C); Rishi Singh, Alcon (F), Apellis (F), Genentech (C), Genentech (F), Optos (C), Regeneron (F), Regneron (C), Shire (C), Zeiss (C); Alex Yuan, None; Jonathan Sears, None; Jamie Reese, None; Stiegel Laura, None; Justis Ehlers, Alcon (C), Alcon (F), Alimera (C), Allergan (C), Bausch and Lomb (P), Bioptigen (C), Bioptigen (P), Genentech (C), Genentech (F), Leica (C), Leica (P), Regeneron (F), Santen (C), Synergetics (P), Thrombogenics (C), Thrombogenics (F), Zeiss (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Genentech ML28914 NIH/NEI K23-EY022947; Ohio Department of Development TECH-13-059
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 1913. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      sruthi arepalli, Sunil K Srivastava, Rishi P Singh, Alex Yuan, Jonathan E Sears, Jamie Reese, Stiegel Laura, Justis Ehlers; Assessment of pre-trial bevacizumab response in the REACT study: A prospective comparative dosing trial of ranibizumab in eyes previously treated with bevacizumab.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):1913.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) inhibitors are commonly used in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), sometimes with variable response. The REACT study analyzes patients with persistent DME that were previously treated with intravitreal bevacizumab and switched to ranibizumab. This analysis evaluates the pre-trial response to bevacizumab compares this to the subsequent response to ranibizumab.

Methods : REACT is an IRB-approved, 12-month, prospective IND trial evaluating the efficacy of ranibizumab in eyes with bevacizumab-resistant DME (NCT#: NCT01982435). In this study, the medical record prior to enrollment in REACT was reviewed during initial bevacizumab treatment. For enrollment eligibility, all eyes were treated with a minimum of 6 bevacizumab injections in the previous 12 months, a minimum of 2 in the last 10 weeks, and 1 in the 6 weeks prior to enrollment. Analysis was based on visits with consecutive bevacizumab injections no more than 8 weeks apart. Clinical parameters including visual acuity and anatomic parameters on OCT [e.g., central subfoveal thickness (CST), macular volume (MV), intraretinal fluid (IRF), and subretinal fluid (SRF)] compared to the REACT study.

Results : 27 eyes with DME were enrolled in the REACT study. Prior to this, subjects received an average of 8.2 bevacizumab injections. Before REACT, 14.8% patients gained >3 lines following bevacizumab therapy, and vision loss of >3 lines was noted in 7.2% of patients. Following enrollment in REACT and switching to ranibizumab, 18.5% of the study group gained >3 lines, while 3.7% lost >3 lines. Initial mean CST was 463 um upon initiation of bevacizumab therapy. Anatomic response to initial bevacizumab showed a mean reduction of 44 um (-9.5%, p=0.19). Following ranibizumab therapy, there was an additional 100 um mean reduction (-24%, p<0.01).

Conclusions : In this cohort of treatment-resistant eyes, bevacizumab therapy showed modest gains in visual acuity and only minimal anatomic response. Following initiation of ranibizumab therapy in the REACT study, eyes demonstrated significant reserve for improvement in both vision and anatomy. This study suggests that in-class switching (e.g., alternate VEGF inhibitor) may result in significant improvement in visual acuity and anatomy in select eyes.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×