June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Commercial lid cleanser outperforms baby shampoo for management of blepharitis in randomized, double-masked clinical trial
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jennifer P Craig
    Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Justin Sung
    Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Michael T. M. Wang
    Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Isabella Cheung
    Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Trevor Sherwin
    Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Salim Ismail
    Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jennifer Craig, Akorn Inc. (F); Justin Sung, None; Michael Wang, None; Isabella Cheung, None; Trevor Sherwin, None; Salim Ismail, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 2247. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jennifer P Craig, Justin Sung, Michael T. M. Wang, Isabella Cheung, Trevor Sherwin, Salim Ismail; Commercial lid cleanser outperforms baby shampoo for management of blepharitis in randomized, double-masked clinical trial. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):2247.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare the efficacy of a commercial eyelid cleanser and diluted baby shampoo in blepharitis management.

Methods : Forty-three participants with clinical signs of blepharitis were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-masked, paired-eye trial. A commercial eyelid cleanser (TheraTears® SteriLid®) was applied to the eyelids of one eye (randomized), and diluted baby shampoo (Johnson’s® No More Tears®) to the fellow eye, twice daily for four weeks. Tear film parameters, ocular surface characteristics, symptomatology (SPEED and SANDE questionnaires) and the expression of markers of inflammation (MMP-9, IL-6) and goblet cell function (MUC5AC), were assessed at baseline and on day 28.

Results : No significant differences in baseline measurements were detected between treatment groups (all p>0.05). SPEED score, upper lid wiper epitheliopathy, greasy crusting, and trichiasis decreased significantly with both treatments (all p<0.05), and did not differ between groups (all p>0.05). Improvements in the tear film lipid layer, lower lid wiper epitheliopathy, cylindrical collarettes, and MMP-9 expression were found only with the commercial eyelid cleanser (all p<0.05), and a greater decrease in symptoms (SANDE questionnaire) was also observed (p=0.04). Meibomian gland orifice obstruction and MUC5AC expression worsened with baby shampoo treatment (both p<0.05). A significantly higher proportion of participants preferred the eyelid cleanser over the baby shampoo solution (p<0.001).

Conclusions : Clinical improvements were observed with both treatments in blepharitis patients, although baby shampoo appeared to reduce goblet cell function. The commercial eyelid cleanser was shown to be more effective in reducing inflammation and improving lipid layer function, and was the preferred treatment option among participants.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×