June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Self-reported visual function and related quality of life in low-income visually impaired patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nivea Nunes Cavascan
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Paula Sacai
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Hye Lim Oh
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Paula Baptista Eliseo Silva
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Carla Ribeiro da Silva Santos
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Ariadne Stavare Leal
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Celia Regina Nakanami
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Nivea Nunes Cavascan, None; Paula Sacai, None; Hye Lim Oh, None; Paula Silva, None; Carla Santos, None; Ariadne Leal, None; Celia Nakanami, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 3297. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nivea Nunes Cavascan, Paula Sacai, Hye Lim Oh, Paula Baptista Eliseo Silva, Carla Ribeiro da Silva Santos, Ariadne Stavare Leal, Celia Regina Nakanami; Self-reported visual function and related quality of life in low-income visually impaired patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):3297.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Rehabilitative intervention may benefit low-vision patients by improvement of their useful residual vision, social inclusion and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to assess self-reported visual function and related quality of life in low-income visually impaired patients referred for visual rehabilitation.

Methods : Adult subjects referred to visual rehabilitation with best-corrected distance visual acuity ≤0.6logMAR in the better-vision eye were included. Participants underwent to monocular and binocular visual acuity (ETDRS chart) for distance (DVA) and near (NVA), and the visual performance (VP) with optical device was measured when it was used. The WHO 20-item International Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ) was administered in individual interviews. VFQ validation was provided by examining internal consistency of responses to subscale questions as measured by Cronbach’s alpha statistic. Pearson’s correlation and t-test were used to assess the association of VFQ scores with age, gender, visual impairment severity, time lived with disability and optical device usage. Statistical significance was considered as p≤0.05.

Results : Twenty participants (12 females – 60%) with ages ranging from 19 to 82 years (mean=50.0±20.0) were included. Mean binocular DVA was 0.97±0.28logMAR and NVA 0.92±0.29logMAR, and 65% (n=13) of participants were enabled to use optical devices, achieving VP from 0.0 to 0.6 logMAR with them. Subscales for visual functioning (VF: general vision, distant vision, near vision, sensory adaptation) and quality of life (QOL: pain, social activities, mental status) had internal consistency of responses of 0.89 and 0.74, respectively. VF score was significantly higher for rehabilitated participants when compared to those without optical device usage (t=-2.213; p=0.040). Higher QOL score was significantly associated with older age (r=0.489; p=0.029). VF and QOL scores were not influenced by gender, visual impairment severity and time lived with disability.

Conclusions : Patients enabled to use of optical devices had a higher VF score while younger patients had a worse QOL score through the VFQ instrument. This method of evaluation may be useful in clinical practice to assess the real impact of the rehabilitation program on the daily life of visually impaired persons.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×