June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Assessing macular functional changes post epiretinal membrane peeling using microperimetry:3 month outcomes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rashmi Nair
    Research, Sydney Institute of Vision Science, Sydney , New South Wales, Australia
    Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Bobak Bahrami
    Research, Sydney Institute of Vision Science, Sydney , New South Wales, Australia
    Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Thomas Hong
    Research, Sydney Institute of Vision Science, Sydney , New South Wales, Australia
  • Andrew Chang
    Research, Sydney Institute of Vision Science, Sydney , New South Wales, Australia
    Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Rashmi Nair, None; Bobak Bahrami, None; Thomas Hong, None; Andrew Chang, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 3683. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rashmi Nair, Bobak Bahrami, Thomas Hong, Andrew Chang; Assessing macular functional changes post epiretinal membrane peeling using microperimetry:3 month outcomes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):3683.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : A reduction in visual acuity and visual symptoms are considered as indications for epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling surgery however post-operative functional prognosis is still difficult to predict. Fundus-driven microperimetry provides quantification of retinal sensitivity and is being increasingly used to assess macular function. This study prospectively evaluated anatomical and functional changes using microperimetry undergoing ERM peeling.

Methods : Thirty patients diagnosed with ERM planned for surgery were recruited. All patients were assessed preoperatively and 3 months post-operatively. Baseline and postoperative examination included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry. Outcome measures were changes in BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), fixation stability, average and central 4○ threshold. Student's t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used for the statistical analysis.

Results : At 3 months mean±standard deviation BCVA improved by 6.90±5.48 letters (p<0.01) and CMT reduced by 71.03±50.82µm (p<0.01). There was an improvement in microperimetric average and central 4○ thresholds (4.72±3.89dB and 3.14±6.79dB respectively p=0.01) and fixation stability (13.45±29.81%, p<0.001). Patients with a lower baseline average threshold (<25dB) had a greater mean gain in average threshold and BCVA at 3 months (5.82±3.58dB and 7.09±5.49 letters respectively p <0.01) compared to patients with normal baseline average threshold (3.22±1.48 dB and 6.01±4.3 letters respectively, p=0.01). Baseline BCVA was equivalent between these groups. Improvement in BCVA and reduction in CMT was found to be moderately correlated with an increase in average threshold (R= 0.68, P=0.01 and R= 0.71, P=0.01 respectively). A correlation was not found between BCVA and CMT with central 4○ threshold (R=0.49, R=0.51 respectively).

Conclusions : Anatomical and functional outcomes improved significantly 3 months post ERM peeling. Despite having similar BCVA at baseline, patients with lower retinal sensitivity compared to those with normal retinal sensitivity at baseline showed greater gain in BCVA and improved macular function after 3 months. Patient selection for surgery and predicting prognosis postoperatively may be guided by baseline microperimetry parameters together with baseline BCVA and symptomatology.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×