June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Measuring Contrast Sensitivity using CambBlobs2 Disposable Paper Charts in Normal Subjects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Andrea Griffin
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Han Cheng
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • John Robson
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Andrea Griffin, None; Han Cheng, None; John Robson, Precision Vision (C), Precision Vision (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NEI T35EY007088
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 4231. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Andrea Griffin, Han Cheng, John Robson; Measuring Contrast Sensitivity using CambBlobs2 Disposable Paper Charts in Normal Subjects. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):4231.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To establish the normative range and reproducibility of CamBlobs2, a newly designed inexpensive, near contrast sensitivity (CS) test, in normal subjects

Methods : Monocular and binocular CS were measured with CamBlobs2 chart at near and Pelli-Robson (PR) chart at 1 meter with the same luminance (85 cd/m2) in 30 habitually-corrected normal subjects (M:F = 8:22; mean age 37±14 years) two times (1-10 days apart). Mean high contrast logMAR acuity was 0.01±0.14 OD, 0.03±0.21 OS at distance, 0.06±0.12 OD, 0.07±0.14 OS at near. CamBlobs2 consists of 25 lines of 9 mm-diameter round blobs: 4 randomly located blobs (all with the same Weber contrast) per line, 0.05 increase in logCS from line-to-line (logCS range 0.80 to 2.05). Subjects were asked to mark the position of blobs on a CamBlobs2 chart held at their usual reading distance with guessing encouraged and maneuvering the angle of chart allowed. CamBlobs2 was scored based on the highest line on which the subject correctly marked two or fewer blobs. PR CS was scored with each correct letter counted as 0.05 logCS (range 0.00 to 2.40). At their first visit, the first 22 subjects also completed a test in which the contrast blobs were of various sizes (13, 9, 6 mm) to assess the effect of angular subtense of blobs on CS. Mean scores were compared with paired t test. Intervisit reproducibility was assessed with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) based on Bland-Altman plots.

Results : Mean logCS (±SD) with CamBlobs2 at two visits were almost identical (1.87±0.11 OD, 1.84±0.09 OS, 2.00±0.08 OU at visit 1, 1.86±0.12, 1.84±0.10, 1.98±0.11 at visit 2; p>0.05 for all). Intervisit LoA for CamBlobs2 was -0.19 to 0.20 OD, -0.15 to 0.16 OS, -0.13 to 0.18 OU. Mean logCS difference between the largest and the smallest blobs was 0.024±0.009 SEM, well within LoA. Mean logCS with PR at visit 1 (1.87±0.10 OD, 1.82±0.08 OS, 2.04±0.08 OU) showed no difference from that at visit 2 (1.90±0.09 OD, 1.84±0.13 OS, 2.04±0.08 OU, p>0.05 for all). Intervisit LoA for PR was -0.20 to 0.15 OD, -0.21 to 0.16 OS, -0.13 to 0.13 OU.

Conclusions : The normative range and reproducibility of Camblobs2 showed remarkably good agreement with PR CS. CamBlobs2 is less dependent on viewing distance and refractive error than letter or grating contrast tests and has the potential to allow patient self-assessment of CS outside the doctor’s office.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×