June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Comparison of Non-Sedated Cone Flicker ERG Screening Test and Sedated Conventional ERG in Children
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Carla Jeannette Osigian
    Pediatric Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Sara Grace
    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
  • Kara Marie Cavuoto
    Pediatric Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
  • William J Feuer
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Mehdi Tavakoli
    Pediatric Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Hilda Capo
    Pediatric Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Byron L Lam
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Carla Osigian, LKC Technologies, Inc (F); Sara Grace, None; Kara Cavuoto, None; William Feuer, None; Mehdi Tavakoli, None; Hilda Capo, None; Byron Lam, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 4280. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Carla Jeannette Osigian, Sara Grace, Kara Marie Cavuoto, William J Feuer, Mehdi Tavakoli, Hilda Capo, Byron L Lam; Comparison of Non-Sedated Cone Flicker ERG Screening Test and Sedated Conventional ERG in Children. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):4280.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Electroretinography (ERG) assesses retinal function and is useful in diagnosing hereditary retinal disorders. However its use is limited in children by cost, test availability, and general anesthesia (GA) risks. We prospectively evaluated a handheld ERG device (RETeval) as a screening tool and compared it to conventional ERG under GA in children.

Methods : We enrolled 16 children undergoing full-field ERG under GA at an academic eye institute. Prior to GA, all patients underwent RETeval 30-Hz cone flicker ERG testing using skin electrodes, with a standard international stimulus (3 cd-s/m2 white flash, 30 cd/m2 white background, frequency 28.3 Hz). A standard full-field ERG using bipolar Burian-Allen contact lens electrodes with a handheld stimulus using a conventional ERG system (E3 Diagnosys) under GA was performed. Subsequently, RETeval 30-Hz flicker skin electrode testing was repeated. The amplitudes and implicit times of the three 30-Hz cone flicker recordings were compared using Bland-Altman plot analysis and Pearson correlation.

Results : Of the 16 patients (mean age 4 years, 4 retinitis pigmentosa, 2 achromatopsia, 2 Leber congenital amaurosis, 1 on vigabatrin), 8 had normal range Diagnosys cone flicker responses. For all patients, the RETeval amplitudes were smaller when awake (mean -38.3 uV, SD 36.8, limit of agreement 95% CI -111.8 to 35.2, Pearson r=0.60) and under GA (-29.5 uV, SD 34.5, 95% CI -98.5 to 39.6, r=0.7) than the Diagnosys. For the 8 patients with normal Diagnosys responses, the RETeval responses were substantially lower. The RETeval implicit times were longer when awake (+1.2 ms, SD 7.7 ms, 95% CI -14.2 to 16.6 ms, r=0.3) and under GA (+2.3 ms, SD 6.0 ms, 95% CI -9.7 to 14.3 ms, r=0.5) than the Diagnosys. When comparing RETeval values prior to and under GA, amplitudes were lower under GA than awake (-3.4 uV, SD 6.5, 95% CI -16.4 to 9.6, r=0.61), and the implicit times were shorter when awake than under GA (-2.1 ms, SD 8.7 ms, 95% CI -19.4 to 15.3 ms, r=0.38).

Conclusions : The 30-Hz cone flicker ERG screening test using the RETeval in children has smaller and prolonged responses than the conventional cone flicker ERG responses under GA. This is likely due to differences between skin and contact lens electrodes. When the responses of the RETeval cone flicker screening test are impaired, a conventional ERG using the full international protocol should be performed.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×