June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Glaucoma Eyedrop Instillation Profile in Patients Evaluated in Public and Private Practice Sites
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jose A Paczka
    Oftalmologia, University of Guadalajara, Zapopan, Mexico
    Research and Development, Unidad de Diagnostico Temprano del Glaucoma, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
  • Monica Atilano
    Oftalmología, Hospital Dr. Valentín Gómez Farías ISSSTE, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
  • Montserrat Romo Sainz
    Oftalmologia, University of Guadalajara, Zapopan, Mexico
  • Luz America Giorgi Sandoval
    Research and Development, Unidad de Diagnostico Temprano del Glaucoma, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
    Research and Development, Asistencia e Investigación en Glaucoma, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
  • Yesenia Yolanda Dorantes Diez
    Oftalmologia, University of Guadalajara, Zapopan, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jose Paczka, None; Monica Atilano, None; Montserrat Romo Sainz, None; Luz Giorgi Sandoval, None; Yesenia Dorantes Diez, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 4588. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jose A Paczka, Monica Atilano, Montserrat Romo Sainz, Luz America Giorgi Sandoval, Yesenia Yolanda Dorantes Diez; Glaucoma Eyedrop Instillation Profile in Patients Evaluated in Public and Private Practice Sites. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):4588.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : This study evaluated the performance profile to administer topical hypotensive medications of patients with glaucoma attending either a public hospital or a private specialized glaucoma center.

Methods : This prospective study included consecutive patients with glaucoma visiting either the department of ophthalmology in a large tertiary public hospital or a private referral glaucoma center. Patients completed an 11-item questionnaire regarding aspects of patients’ eye drop administration. Attending ophthalmologists verbally applied such questionnaire to the participants at the time of their regular clinical visit. In addition to providing demographic and general data, relevant information included type of glaucoma, best-corrected visual acuity, visual field indexes, number of glaucoma medications and time since first use of glaucoma eye drop administration ever.

Results : A total of 129 questionnaires were applied to 60 patients at the public hospital and 69 patients at the private glaucoma center. All patients self-administered their drops and had a diagnosis glaucoma during a mean of 4.9 ± 3.1 and 5.6 ± 3.5 years (public site vs. private site, respectively). The proportion of female participants was statistically larger in the private site (P=0.02) as compared to the public one. No statistically difference (P>0.05) was found regarding age (65.9 ± 9.9 vs. 67.3 ± 12.9 years), type of glaucoma, level of education, mean best-corrected visual acuity (LogMAR), mean DM, mean DSM, time using glaucoma drops, and number of glaucoma medications, according to the kind of practice site. On respect of eye drop technique as described by the specific applied questionnaire: a larger proportion of patients attending the private site reported to receive prior information on how to instill eye drops (P=0.0001), and remember to shake the bottle before use (P=0.01); in contrast, a larger proportion of patients attending the public site informed to often have the drops missing the eye (P=0.005).

Conclusions : Differences on specific aspects of self-administration glaucoma eye drops were demonstrated in this study in patients attending either public or private practices. Recognizing the reasons for such differences and the significance of the findings to the process of disease control warrants further investigation at different clinical settings.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×