June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Surgical Traceculectomy Training - Are we safe at supervising?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hayun Lee
    Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
  • Nitin Anand
    Calderdale & Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield, United Kingdom
  • David C Broadway
    Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
  • James Huxtable
    Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
  • Anthony King
    Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • James Kirwan
    Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
  • Alex MacLeod
    Southampton General Hospital, Hampshire, United Kingdom
  • Andrew Ian McNaught
    Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, United Kingdom
  • Sam Naylor
    Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
  • Martyn Senior
    Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
  • Peter Shah
    University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Freda Sii
    University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Suzy Turner
    Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, United Kingdom
  • Andrew Walkden
    Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
  • Archana Bhargava
    Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Hayun Lee, None; Nitin Anand, None; David Broadway, None; James Huxtable, None; Anthony King, None; James Kirwan, None; Alex MacLeod, None; Andrew McNaught, None; Sam Naylor, None; Martyn Senior, None; Peter Shah, None; Freda Sii, None; Suzy Turner, None; Andrew Walkden, None; Archana Bhargava, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 4939. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hayun Lee, Nitin Anand, David C Broadway, James Huxtable, Anthony King, James Kirwan, Alex MacLeod, Andrew Ian McNaught, Sam Naylor, Martyn Senior, Peter Shah, Freda Sii, Suzy Turner, Andrew Walkden, Archana Bhargava; Surgical Traceculectomy Training - Are we safe at supervising?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):4939.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : UK Trainees glaucoma surgical exposure is limited due to constraints of service, the European working time directive and increasing subspecialisation. Limited knowledge exists on trainee trabeculectomy outcomes. Our study analyses outcomes of supervised trabeculectomy outcomes performed by trainees in a large cohort.

Methods : Retrospective case note review of all patients that had trabeculectomy surgery with mitomycin-C by Consultant and trainee surgeons between March 2011 and November 2013 across multiple UK centres. All eyes have 2-year follow-up. Data includes intraocular pressure (IOP) which is pre-operative, 1 and 2 years and Snellen acuities. Failure rate and surgical complications were recorded. Success was determined using WGA guidelines. Two-tailed p-values were obtained using Fisher’s exact test to ascertain statistical significance between groups.

Results : 324 eyes were reviewed. 6 cases (1.85%) were excluded due to incomplete follow up data, leaving 318 eyes for analysis. Mean age was 72.7 years (range 35-98 years). 211 (66.4%) cases were performed by Glaucoma Consultants. 107 (33.6%) cases were performed by trainee ophthalmologists with limited trabeculectomy experience. The modal diagnosis in each group was primary open angle glaucoma.

Post operative IOP control showed no significant difference between consultant and trainee groups at year 1 and year 2 (p=0.88 and 0.61 respectively). Success rates showed no significant difference between consultant and trainee cases (p=0.22, 0.52 respectively). Failure rates at year 1 showed a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.04). No significant difference was seen at year 2 (p=0.50).

Bleb leak and hypotony were the most common complications for both groups (n=15 for each) with the trainees having significantly more, compared with the Consultants (p=0.02). Snellen visual acuity change was not statistically significant between the two groups (p=0.41).

Conclusions : The 2 year outcomes of trainee trabeculectomy compare favourably with Consultants. Trainee cases had a higher rate of reintervention, but overall outcomes are good. These findings help guide informed consent for trainee surgery. It is possible to safely train the next generation of glaucoma surgeons.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×