June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Patient Outcomes for a Glaucoma Referral Refinement Clinic
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Peter Campbell
    Optometry and Vision Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Ophthalmology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Laura Edwards
    Optometry and Vision Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Jennifer Egan
    Ophthalmology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Parul Patel
    Ophthalmology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • K Sheng Lim
    Ophthalmology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Peter Campbell, None; Laura Edwards, None; Jennifer Egan, None; Parul Patel, None; K Sheng Lim, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 5313. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Peter Campbell, Laura Edwards, Jennifer Egan, Parul Patel, K Sheng Lim; Patient Outcomes for a Glaucoma Referral Refinement Clinic. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):5313.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To investigate visit outcomes for patients seen in a glaucoma referral refinement clinic over a three year period.

Methods : Patients referred to a NHS Trust from community optometrists, with elevated IOP using non-contact tonometry, are seen initially by an optometrist in a hospital-based referral refinement clinic. Patients undergo visual field testing, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, van Herick grading, optic disc assessment and are then either discharged back to their community optometrist or referred on to a consultant ophthalmologist. Data on patient outcomes and the reasons for any onward referral were analyzed for patients seen over a 5 month period (October to February) from 2013 to 2016.

Results : The number of patients seen in 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 were 30, 47 and 18 respectively. The percentages of patients discharged over the three years were 37%, 47% and 50% respectively. There was no significant change in the proportion of patients discharged over this time period (χ2=1.06, p=0.59). The reasons for onward referral to a consultant ophthalmologist were: elevated IOP (n=34), visual field defect (n=14), suspicious disc appearance (n=9) and narrow angle (n=7); in 11 cases more than one reason for onward referral was stated.

Conclusions : The number of patients seen in 2015-16 was less than in previous years, however the proportion of patients discharged from this referral refinement clinic has not changed significantly over the last three years. The reduction in the number of patients referred to this clinic may in part be due to an increase in community-based glaucoma referral refinement clinics and/or an increase in the practice of Applanation Tonometry by community optometrists; leading to a reduction in false positive referrals.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×