Abstract
purpose. To determine independent predictors of exudative retinal detachment
(RD) in eyes with uveal melanoma and the significance of RD in
melanoma-specific survival.
methods. The extent of exudative RD was recorded retrospectively in a
population-based cohort of 167 consecutive patients with eyes
enucleated from 1972 through 1981 because of choroidal and ciliary body
melanoma, representing all melanomas treated during that period.
Histopathologic features including microvascular loops and networks,
microvascular density (MVD), and tumor-infiltrating macrophages were
determined. Clinical and histologic predictors of RD were modeled by
multiple logistic regression with a split-sample, cross-validation
design. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and adjusted for
the effect of competing predictors by Cox proportional hazards
regression.
results. Of 142 (85%) eyes with adequate data, 25% had no RD, 16% had
subretinal fluid around the tumor, 43% had clinical RD in one to two
quadrants, and 16% had RD in three to four quadrants. The RD was more
extensive if the tumor was large (P < 0.0001) and
had microvascular loops and networks (P = 0.0094)
and less extensive if it involved ciliary body (P =
0.011). High MVD (P = 0.054) and ruptured Bruch’s
membrane (P = 0.065) tended to be associated with
RD. Multiple logistic regression showed largest basal diameter (odds
ratio [OR] 1.43 for each 1-mm change, P <
0.0001), microvascular loops and networks (OR 1.95 for each category
change, P = 0.0095), and ciliary body involvement
(OR 0.20, P = 0.0039) to be independently
associated with RD; ruptured Bruch’s membrane (P =
0.96) and MVD (P = 0.87) were not associated.
Clinical RD predicted poor survival (0.59 vs. 0.37 at 20 years; P = 0.029) by Kaplan-Meier analysis, but not after
adjusting for other prognostic factors by Cox regression (hazard ratio[
HR] 1.00, P = 1.0).
conclusions. Tumor size, which may be a surrogate measure for total vascular content
and decompensation of choriocapillaris and retinal pigment epithelium,
is a strong predictor of exudative RD. Microvascular loops and networks
are likewise associated with exudative RD. Exudative RD is not
associated with survival after adjusting for tumor size and
microvascular loops and networks.
Exudative retinal detachment (RD) is detected clinically in
up to 75% of eyes with malignant uveal melanoma, and it is the most
common abnormality that accompanies this tumor.
1 Large- to
medium-sized melanomas produce serious damage to the eye, including
symptomatic to total RD. Most choroidal nevi do not cause
neuroepithelial detachment, let alone exudative RD. Consequently,
subretinal fluid over the tumor and asymptomatic exudative RD, which
has gravitated from the tumor to the dependent portion of the eye, are
useful signs when establishing the diagnosis of uveal
melanoma.
2 3 Subretinal fluid predicts growth of small
melanocytic tumors, and of such lesions, 59% to 86% grow during
follow-up.
4 5 6 7 Preoperative exudative RD is a high-risk
indicator for poor visual outcome and enucleation after conservative
treatment of uveal melanoma.
8 9
The influence of exudative RD on survival is a moot
point.
7 10 Although the presence of exudative RD was found
to be a risk factor for tumor growth, metastasis, and tumor-related
death among patients who underwent enucleation and proton beam therapy
for choroidal and ciliary body melanoma,
9 11 it did not
predict which patients would have metastasis after plaque
brachytherapy.
11 12
Although exudative RD is an established marker of disease
activity
4 5 6 7 and high complication rate
8 9 after conservative therapy for uveal melanoma, factors other than large
tumor size and posterior location that contribute to the presence of RD
are incompletely understood.
3 10 13 Textbooks that
speculate on this matter suggest that reduced venous return leads to
diffuse choroidal leakage, in particular when a posterior melanoma
presses against a vortex vein or when Bruch’s membrane is ruptured and
acts as a tourniquet around the base of the tumor.
1 3 14 Fluorescein angiography indeed reveals diffuse extravasation from tumor
and retinal vessels.
15 16 Presence of RD has also been
linked with rapidity of growth and necrosis of the
tumor.
3 14 We designed a study to establish to what extent
the presence of exudative RD in eyes with malignant uveal melanoma is
associated with clinical and histopathologic characteristics of the
tumor and with melanoma-specific survival, giving special emphasis to
microvascular factors.
The location (choroid, ciliary body, or both), largest basal
diameter (LBD) and height of the tumor, and integrity of Bruch’s
membrane (unruptured, ruptured) were ascertained from the original
clinical and pathology reports and checked to be consistent with the
sections available. Cell type was registered according to the modified
Callender classification (spindle, mixed, or epithelioid). If the
original report mentioned the presence of epithelioid cells in a tumor
classified as spindle-cell type, the tumor was upgraded to the
mixed-cell type.
Tumor-infiltrating macrophages were semiquantitatively graded (few,
moderate, or many) from sections immunostained with mAb PG-M1 to the
CD68 epitope (IgG3, diluted 1:50; lot 101; Dakopatts, Klostrup,
Denmark) after predigestion in 0.4% (wt/vol) pepsin in 0.01 M
HCl.
18 The avidin-biotinylated peroxidase complex method
(Vectastain ABC Elite Kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and
3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride as chromogen were
used.
18 Melanin was bleached after immunostaining with
hydrogen peroxide and disodium hydrogen phosphate.
19
The clinical extent of RD was assessed according to predefined
criteria from patient charts by one investigator masked to
histopathologic data. Clinical rather than histopathologic criteria
were used, because almost all melanoma-affected eyes have microscopic
subretinal fluid,
20 21 the extent of RD is more difficult
to grade from sections, and investigator bias may be caused by
awareness of microvascular and other histopathologic features of the
tumor. Each eye was classified into one of four categories:
-
No RD: subretinal fluid not mentioned
-
Subretinal fluid: detachment of neurosensory retina over and around the
melanoma, without clinical exudative RD extending to the periphery
-
Clinical exudative RD with one to two quadrants of the retina involved,
with or without subretinal fluid over and around the tumor (typically,
RD in the dependent part of the eye)
-
Clinical exudative RD with three to four quadrants of the retina
involved
These categories were easy to apply. In case assignment was not
explicit, a second investigator reviewed the chart, and final
categorization was based on consensus.
No association
(Table 1) was noted between the extent of RD and
gender, age (
Fig. 1A ;
P = 0.092), presence of
epithelioid cells (
P = 0.18 Kruskal-Walls test), and
number of tumor-infiltrating macrophages (
P = 0.79
Jonckheere-Terpstra test). The RD was significantly more extensive in
eyes with large tumors, as judged by LBD (
Fig. 1B ;
P < 0.0001 Jonckheere-Terpstra test) and height
(
Fig. 1C ;
P < 0.0001) and in eyes with melanoma that
had either microvascular loops or networks (
Table 1 ;
P = 0.0094), whereas melanomas that involved the ciliary body gave rise
to less extensive RD than those limited to the choroid
(
P = 0.011 Kruskal-Wallis test). Melanomas that had
ruptured Bruch’s membrane (
Table 1 ;
P = 0.065) and
those with high MVD (
Fig. 1D ;
P = 0.054
Jonckheere-Terpstra test) tended to be associated with more extensive
RD than those with intact Bruch’s membrane and low MVD.
Because melanomas with ciliary body involvement probably do not have
full potential to cause RD, the 110 choroidal melanomas were analyzed
as a separate group. The effect of LBD (P < 0.0001
Jonckheere-Terpstra test, Bonferroni correction), height
(P < 0.0001), and microvascular loops and networks
(P = 0.017) was retained in this group. The effect of a
ruptured Bruch’s membrane (P = 0.11 Kruskal-Wallis,
Bonferroni correction), presence of epithelioid cells
(P = 0.097), and high MVD (P = 0.068
Jonckheere-Terpstra test, Bonferroni correction) did not appreciably
change in magnitude. When the analysis was limited to the 32 melanomas
involving the ciliary body, only LBD (P = 0.025
Jonckheere-Terpstra test, Bonferroni correction) was associated with
the extent of RD.
Presence of exudative RD in eyes with uveal melanoma was modeled
by multiple logistic regression. Based on the anatomic fact that
ciliary body tumors do not have full potential to leak under the retina
because of their location, involvement of the ciliary body was modeled
as a confounding variable—that is, as a variable that theory dictates
must always be included in the model.
In a starting model, LBD and the status of Bruch’s membrane, the two
factors that RD is most often ascribed to in textbooks, were assessed
as independent variables—that is, statistical analysis was used to
look for evidence of their association with RD
(Table 2) . High LBD was significantly associated with presence of RD (odds ratio[
OR], 1.40 for each 1-mm change;
P = 0.0004, Waldχ
2 test), but a rupture in Bruch’s membrane
was not associated with presence of RD (
P = 0.96). A
model that included presence of epithelioid cells (OR, 1.29; 95% CI
0.39–4.34;
P = 0.63) was also discarded. Consequently,
a reduced model that excluded these nonsignificant variables served as
a basis for further comparison
(Table 2) .
A model was then considered in which microvascular factors were
assessed
(Table 2) . MVD was found not to be associated with presence of
RD (
P = 0.87), whereas an ordered three-category
variable that considered microvascular networks to be an advanced stage
of loops (no loops, loops without networks, loops forming networks) was
significantly associated with the presence of RD (OR, 1.98 for a
one-category change;
P = 0.052). When modeled as
unordered variables, the presence of loops without networks was not
significantly associated with RD (OR, 2.78;
P = 0.22),
whereas the presence of loops forming networks was significantly
associated with the presence of RD (OR, 4.30;
P =
0.041). That the latter OR was approximately 1.5 times larger than the
former, supports a dosage effect, lending support to the use of the
ordered three-category variable based on hierarchy of loops and
networks.
The final model consequently included LBD, microvascular loops and
networks, and involvement of the ciliary body
(Table 2) . It fitted the
data significantly better than the reduced model, which included only
LBD and ciliary body involvement (−2 log likelihood, 81.4–76.9 =
4.50, 1
df,
P = 0.034,χ
2 test). This was reflected in the fact that
the predicted probabilities of RD were located farther from the cutoff
score than those predicted by the reduced model
(Fig. 2) .
As explained in the Methods section, the model was built with an
analysis sample that consisted of a randomly chosen subset of patients.
To confirm that the final model was valid, and applicable to other
patients with uveal melanoma, it was then tested on a validation
sample, consisting of the remaining patients. The model correctly
predicted the presence of RD in 73% of eyes in both analysis and
validation samples. This compared favorably with the maximum-chance
criteria (obtained by assigning all eyes to the larger group) and the
proportional-chance criteria (obtained by randomly assigning all eyes
to the two groups according to group size) used to assess the
performance of regression models, which correctly predicted the
presence of RD in 56% and 51% of eyes, respectively.
After the validity of the final model was confirmed, more precise
coefficients were estimated from the entire series of patients
(Table 2) . These coefficients were entered into the general logistic model,
and the probability of exudative RD was calculated for uveal melanomas
of various size, location, and microvascular pattern
(Table 3) . This table can be used as a guide to estimate the risk for exudative
RD in clinical practice or to compare the risk between two given
tumors. For example, a choroidal melanoma with microvascular networks
and 9-mm LBD is readily seen to have a 10 times higher risk (0.50 vs.
0.05) for exudative RD than a ciliochoroidal melanoma of identical size
but without any microvascular loops
(Table 3) .
Large tumor size, posterior location, and ruptured Bruch’s
membrane are the characteristics of malignant uveal melanoma that are
most frequently linked with presence of exudative RD.
13 Multiple logistic regression confirmed that tumor size is the single
most important predictor of RD in eyes with choroidal and ciliary body
melanoma, and that location of the tumor is also important. The
impression that ruptured Bruch’s membrane alone would be associated
with exudative RD was not substantiated.
1 14 Although such
rupture was moderately associated with RD by univariate analysis, the
effect disappeared when LBD was controlled for by logistic regression.
Instead, microvascular loops and, in particular, networks formed from
back-to-back loops, were associated with the presence of RD in this
data set, even when tumor size and location were controlled for.
The logistic model does not reveal the mechanism by which large tumors
cause RD; in particular, it does not tell whether LBD is a surrogate
measure of one or more underlying tumor and host characteristics that
lead to RD. We were able to exclude a number of variables including age
and gender, presence of epithelioid cells and infiltrating macrophages,
and globally highest MVD. It is not inconceivable that the sheer mass
of large tumors may be responsible for RD. For example, the total
vascular content and leakage from tumor tissue would be expected to be
proportional to tumor volume. Findings in the Collaborative Ocular
Melanoma Study
21 showed that vascularity of large
melanomas is more prominent than that of medium-sized ones, and
evidence of broken blood–ocular barrier increases with increasing
tumor size.
34 35 Fluid movement from subretinal space into
the choriocapillaris is a major force that keeps the retina
attached.
36 37 Large tumors have proportionally larger
surface areas and may cause proportionally more widespread
decompensation of the choriocapillaris and retinal pigment epithelium
(RPE).
38 39
Because uveal melanomas that extend to the ciliary body are located
only partially under the retina, they intuitively have a smaller than
average chance of causing RD than choroidal tumors that lie entirely
under the retina. It has also been suggested that anteriorly located
tumors have less chance of compressing vortex veins. Indeed,
involvement of the ciliary body turned out to be an indicator for a low
risk of exudative RD. Entirely choroidal tumors were estimated to have
a five times higher chance of causing RD than tumors that extend to the
ciliary body, when controlling for tumor size and microvascular loops
and networks. Ciliochoroidal melanomas are predicted to cause RD only
if they are 3 to 6 mm larger than choroidal melanomas and if they reach
a diameter of 15 to 18 mm.
Qualitative and quantitative aspects of tumor microvessels have
recently been found to be independent predictors of death caused by
uveal melanoma, a cancer that can spread only hematogenously unless
the conjunctiva is invaded.
17 22 23 25 26 40 41 42 43 Logistic regression provided evidence against a major role of “hot
spots,” areas of densest vascularization, which are associated with
poor prognosis of choroidal and ciliary body melanoma and are
postulated to be active sites of metastasis in other
tumors.
44 In contrast, the association of RD associated
with microvascular loops and, in particular, networks, was
statistically significant. The model suggested a dosage effect,
compatible with a hypothesis that microvessels that form loops may be
unusually leaky and, especially when present in sufficient quantities
to form networks, they may contribute to exudative RD. Although
qualitative aspects of microvessels may be germane to the development
of exudative RD, until experimental evidence for disproportionate
leakage from loops is obtained, the possibility exists that loops are
indicators of hidden, more direct tumor or host effects in this
analysis.
Although the logistic model that included microvascular patterns
provided a significantly better fit in our data set, evidenced by a
clearer separation of true-positive and -negative estimates, it did not
affect cases that scored as false positives and negatives, compared
with the reduced model that included LBD as the only independent
variable. In fact, all models we considered predicted correctly the
presence of RD in 72% to 73% of eyes. Although they were better
predictors of RD than either systematic or random assignment, expected
to provide a correct prediction in 56% and 51% of eyes, respectively,
the proportion of eyes that were misclassified was notable. Several
theories can be invoked to explain this observation.
Because the study was a retrospective one, we may have assigned some
eyes to the wrong group—for example, because a dependent RD
was missed or not mentioned in the chart. In that case, the logistic
model may have classified the eye correctly, but the result would count
as a false negative or positive classification when calculating the hit
ratio. Although this could have been avoided by a prospective study, in
particular with the help of B-scan ultrasonography, it would not have
been possible to get unbiased, population-based histopathologic data,
because the majority of small- to medium-sized melanomas are now
managed conservatively, and statistical results can be extrapolated
only to the population from which the sample is drawn. Moreover, a long
enough follow-up for survival analysis would not have been available.
In the future it may be possible, however, to find microvascular loops
and networks clinically by confocal angiography or high-frequency
ultrasonography.
45 46
Secondly, because logistic regression can handle only a dichotomous
dependent variable, it was obligatory to combine eyes with no RD with
those that had subretinal fluid over and surrounding the tumor. If
local RD were caused by the same factors as clinical RD, it would be a
demanding task to separate these two groups from one another, making it
understandable that false negative and positive assignments would occur
even if the model includes all major variables contributing to RD. This
might have been avoided by using multinomial logistic regression, but
the sample size was not adequate for such an analysis. It should be
explicitly noted that the present model was not designed to predict
which small melanomas will involve overlying subretinal fluid rather
than clinical exudative RD.
4 5 6 7 We believe that a
different set of variables may contribute to local subretinal fluid,
not only because it can be associated with presumed nevi but also
because steep, collar-button–shaped uveal melanomas sometimes seem to
mechanically elevate the retina around the tumor’s base.
Thirdly, the inability to capture all variation in RD and to improve
the hit ratio compared with the reduced model indicates that additional
variables must contribute to RD. These may include excessive leakage
because of high total vascular content or damage to the RPE and
choriocapillaris or because of unbalanced influx of fluid from the
vitreous cavity and abnormal retinal vessels to the subretinal space
caused by changes in osmotic pressure, blocked vortex veins, and
reduced suction from the normally elastic
choroid.
16 34 37 47 The role of these latter factors in
uveal melanoma is elusive. Although damage to the RPE is frequently
given as a cause for exudative RD in eyes with uveal
melanoma,
16 38 39 experimental data suggest that such
damage may also improve outflow of water by allowing the oncotic force
of the choroid to suck out subretinal fluid.
4 5 36 37 48 Some of these possibilities may be addressed by future prospective
clinical studies.
Regarding survival, RD has been an inconsistent indicator of metastatic
death caused by uveal melanoma.
7 9 10 This is
understandable, because previous studies have been based on
subpopulations of patients with disease managed by enucleation or some
conservative measure and thus are probably unbalanced regarding tumor
size.
11 We could confirm a modest risk of metastatic death
by univariate analysis, but Cox regression definitely showed that the
survival difference was entirely due to the association of RD with
large tumor size, microvascular loops and networks, ciliary body
involvement, and, to a lesser extent, high MVD. When these factors were
controlled for, the survival rates of patients with and without
exudative RD were identical. Consequently, the presence or absence of
RD in eyes with malignant uveal melanoma alone does not carry any
information on survival prognosis.
Exudative RD in conservatively managed eyes with uveal melanoma is
associated with a higher than average risk of
complications.
8 9 So far, it has been impossible to reduce
the dose or otherwise control the radiation to combat these
complications. Better understanding of which factors cause and maintain
RD in eyes with uveal melanoma may help ophthalmic oncologists, not
only to predict the risk for persistent exudative RD and secondary
neovascular glaucoma after irradiation, but also to modulate some of
them in the future to reduce this risk.
9 Radiation-induced
alterations may contribute to exudative RD after brachytherapy and
charged-particle treatment, however, and these effects must also be
investigated.
Supported by Grant TYH8218 from the Helsinki University Central Hospital and grants from the Finnish Eye Foundation, Ahokas Foundation, and Eye and Tissue Bank Foundation, Finland.
Submitted for publication September 15, 2000; revised March 9, 2001; accepted March 29, 2001.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked “
advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Tero Kivelä, Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4C, PL 220, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
tero.kivela@helsinki.fi
Table 1. Presence of Exudative RD, According to Tumor Characteristics in 142
Eyes with Malignant Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanoma
Table 1. Presence of Exudative RD, According to Tumor Characteristics in 142
Eyes with Malignant Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanoma
Characteristic | Extent of RD | | | | |
| None | Subretinal Fluid | 1–2 Quadrants | 3–4 Quadrants | P |
Clinical covariates (n = 142) | | | | | |
Gender, n (%) | | | | | 0.33* |
Male | 14 (22) | 13 (20) | 23 (35) | 15 (23) | |
Female | 21 (27) | 10 (13) | 38 (50) | 8 (10) | |
Ciliary body involvement, n (%) | | | | | 0.011* |
No | 22 (20) | 18 (16) | 49 (44) | 21 (19) | |
Yes | 13 (40) | 5 (16) | 12 (38) | 2 (6) | |
Largest basal diameter, n (%) | | | | | <0.0001, † |
≤10 mm | 18 (46) | 9 (23) | 10 (26) | 2 (5) | |
>10–15 mm | 13 (20) | 11 (17) | 33 (50) | 9 (13) | |
>15 mm | 3 (9) | 3 (9) | 17 (48) | 12 (34) | |
Height, n (%) | | | | | 0.0002, † |
≤5 mm | 16 (33) | 12 (25) | 19 (40) | 1 (2) | |
>5–8 mm | 12 (24) | 5 (10) | 25 (50) | 8 (16) | |
>8 mm | 6 (14) | 6 (14) | 16 (38) | 14 (33) | |
Bruch’s membrane, n (%) | | | | | 0.065* |
Unruptured | 23 (31) | 7 (10) | 38 (51) | 6 (8) | |
Ruptured | 11 (17) | 15 (23) | 23 (35) | 17 (26) | |
Histopathologic covariates (n = 124) | | | | | |
Data available, n (%) | | | | | 0.12* |
Yes | 34 (27) | 21 (17) | 48 (39) | 21 (17) | |
No | 1 (6) | 2 (11) | 13 (72) | 2 (11) | |
Cell type, n (%) | | | | | 0.18* |
Spindle | 22 (28) | 18 (22) | 29 (36) | 11 (14) | |
Nonspindle | 12 (27) | 3 (7) | 19 (43) | 10 (23) | |
Microvascular patterns, n (%) | | | | | 0.0094, † |
No loops | 16 (31) | 14 (28) | 17 (33) | 4 (8) | |
Loops only | 10 (34) | 3 (10) | 8 (28) | 8 (28) | |
Networks | 8 (18) | 4 (9) | 23 (52) | 9 (21) | |
Microvascular density, n (%), ‡ | | | | | 0.062, † |
1 quartile (1–24 vessels/0.313 mm2) | 9 (29) | 7 (23) | 10 (32) | 5 (16) | |
2 quartile (25–40 vessels/0.313 mm2) | 12 (39) | 7 (23) | 8 (26) | 4 (13) | |
3 quartile (41–57 vessels/0.313 mm2) | 5 (17) | 5 (17) | 16 (53) | 4 (13) | |
4 quartile (58– vessels/0.313 mm2) | 8 (25) | 2 (6) | 14 (44) | 8 (25) | |
Macrophages, n (%), § | | | | | 0.79, † |
Few | 5 (24) | 6 (29) | 7 (33) | 3 (14) | |
Moderate | 18 (30) | 7 (12) | 22 (37) | 13 (22) | |
Many | 11 (28) | 7 (18) | 17 (44) | 4 (10) | |
Table 2. Multiple Logistic Regression Modeling for Presence of Clinical
Exudative RD in 124 Eyes with Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanoma, by
Cross-Validation Design
Table 2. Multiple Logistic Regression Modeling for Presence of Clinical
Exudative RD in 124 Eyes with Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanoma, by
Cross-Validation Design
Variable | Regression Coefficient (± SE) | Wald test* | P | Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
Starting model (−2 loglikelihood = 79.8; hit ratio = 71.4) | | | | |
Intercept | −3.797 ± 1.229 | 9.59 | 0.0020 | — |
Largest basal tumor diameter | 0.339 ± 0.095 | 12.7 | 0.0004 | 1.40 (1.28–1.54) |
Bruch’s membrane, † | 0.030 ± 0.551 | 0.003 | 0.96 | 1.03 (0.35–3.04) |
Ciliary body involvement, ‡ | −1.089 ± 0.703 | 2.40 | 0.12 | 0.34 (0.08–1.34) |
Reduced model (−2 loglikelihood = 81.4; hit ratio = 72.8) | | | | |
Intercept | −3.791 ± 1.174 | 10.5 | 0.0012 | — |
Largest basal tumor diameter | 0.340 ± 0.094 | 13.1 | 0.0003 | 1.40 (1.17–1.69) |
Ciliary body involvement, ‡ | −1.174 ± 0.684 | 3.36 | 0.071 | 0.29 (0.08–1.11) |
Microvascular model (−2 loglikelihood = 76.2; hit ratio = 71.7) | | | | |
Intercept | −4.222 ± 1.470 | 8.25 | 0.0041 | — |
Largest basal tumor diameter | 0.344 ± 0.102 | 11.4 | 0.0007 | 1.41 (1.16–1.72) |
Microvascular patterns, § | 0.683 ± 0.352 | 3.76 | 0.052 | 1.98 (0.99–3.95) |
Microvascular density, ∥ | −0.029 ± 0.182 | 0.025 | 0.87 | 0.97 (0.68–1.39) |
Ciliary body involvement, ‡ | −1.424 ± 0.709 | 4.03 | 0.045 | 0.24 (0.06–0.97) |
Final model (−2 log likelihood, 76.9; hit ratio, 72.7) | | | | |
Intercept | −4.288 ± 1.273 | 11.3 | 0.0008 | — |
Largest basal tumor diameter | 0.338 ± 0.098 | 11.9 | 0.0006 | 1.40 (1.16–1.70) |
Microvascular patterns, § | 0.635 ± 0.328 | 3.74 | 0.053 | 1.89 (0.99–3.59) |
Ciliary body involvement, ‡ | −1.410 ± 0.700 | 4.07 | 0.044 | 0.24 (0.06–0.96) |
Entire sample (n = 124;hit ratio = 72.4) | | | | |
Intercept | −4.556 ± 0.999 | 20.8 | <0.0001 | — |
Largest basal tumor diameter | 0.358 ± 0.078 | 21.2 | <0.0001 | 1.43 (1.22–1.67) |
Microvascular patterns, § | 0.667 ± 0.257 | 6.73 | 0.0095 | 1.95 (1.18–3.23) |
Ciliary body involvement, ‡ | −1.586 ± 0.550 | 8.31 | 0.0039 | 0.20 (0.07–0.60) |
Table 3. The Estimated Probability of Clinical Exudative RD for Representative
Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanomas of Various Sizes and Microvascular
Patterns
Table 3. The Estimated Probability of Clinical Exudative RD for Representative
Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanomas of Various Sizes and Microvascular
Patterns
Ciliary Body Involvement | Microvascular Patterns | Largest Basal Diameter | | | | | |
| | 6 mm | 9 mm | 12 mm | 15 mm | 18 mm | 21 mm |
No | No loops | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.44 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 0.95 |
| Loops without networks | 0.15 | 0.34 | 0.60 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| Networks | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.90 | 0.96 | 0.99 |
Yes | No loops | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.58 | 0.80 |
| Loops without networks | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.24 | 0.47 | 0.72 | 0.89 |
| Networks | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.37 | 0.64 | 0.84 | 0.94 |
Table 4. Cox Proportional Hazards Regression of Melanoma-Specific Survival,
According to Presence of Clinical Exudative RD in 124 Patients with
Choroidal or Ciliary Body Melanoma
Table 4. Cox Proportional Hazards Regression of Melanoma-Specific Survival,
According to Presence of Clinical Exudative RD in 124 Patients with
Choroidal or Ciliary Body Melanoma
Variable | Regression Coefficient (±SE) | Wald Test* | P | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
Univariate analysis | | | | |
Clinical RD, † | 0.511 ± 0.276 | 3.42 | 0.064 | 1.67 (0.97–2.87) |
Largest basal diameter | 0.116 ± 0.035 | 10.79 | 0.0010 | 1.12 (1.05–1.20) |
Microvascular patterns, ‡ | 0.644 ± 0.157 | 16.86 | <0.0001 | 1.91 (1.40–2.59) |
Microvascular density, § | 0.297 ± 0.069 | 18.5 | <0.0001 | 1.34 (1.17–1.54) |
Ciliary body involvement, † | 0.919 ± 0.277 | 11.0 | 0.0009 | 2.50 (1.46–4.31) |
Multivariate analysis | | | | |
Clinical RD, † | 0.018 ± 0.343 | <0.0001 | 1.0 | 1.00 (0.51–1.96) |
Largest basal diameter | 0.085 ± 0.041 | 4.17 | 0.041 | 1.09 (1.00–1.18) |
Microvascular patterns, ‡ | 0.445 ± 0.167 | 7.05 | 0.0079 | 1.56 (1.12–2.17) |
Microvascular density, § | 0.202 ± 0.074 | 7.45 | 0.0064 | 1.22 (1.06–1.42) |
Ciliary body involvement, † | 0.756 ± 0.288 | 6.89 | 0.0086 | 2.13 (1.21–2.38) |
Yanoff M, Fine BS. Ocular Pathology. 1996; 4th ed. Mosby-Wolfe London.
Fuchs A. Zur klinischen Bedeutung der umscriebenen Netzhautabhebung an der Ora serrata bei beginnendem aderhautsarkom. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1937;98:606–617.
Reese AB. Tumors of the Eye. 1964; 2nd ed. Harper & Row New York.
Gass JD. Observation of suspected choroidal and ciliary body melanomas for evidence of growth prior to enucleation. Ophthalmology
. 1980;87:523–528.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Erie JC, Robertson DM, Mieler WF. Presumed small choroidal melanomas with serous macular detachments with and without surface laser photocoagulation treatment. Am J Ophthalmol
. 1990;109:259–264.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Butler P, Char DH, Zarbin M, Kroll S. Natural history of indeterminate pigmented choroidal tumors. Ophthalmology
. 1994;101:710–716.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Shields GL, Shields JA, Kiratli H, De Potter P, Cater JR. Risk factors for growth and metastasis of small choroidal melanocytic lesions. Ophthalmology
. 1995;102:1351–1361.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Egan KM, Gragoudas ES, Seddon JM, et al. The risk of enucleation after proton beam irradiation of uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology
. 1989;96:1377–1382.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Foss AE, Whelehan I, Hungerford JL, et al. Predictive factors for the development of rubeosis following proton beam radiotherapy for uveal melanoma. Br J Ophthalmol
. 1997;81:748–754.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Coleman K, Baak JP, Van Diest P, Mullaney J, Farrell M, Fenton M. Prognostic factors following enucleation of 111 uveal melanomas. Br J Ophthalmol
. 1993;77:688–692.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Augsburger JJ, Gamel JW, Lauritzen K, Brady LW. Cobalt-60 plaque radiotherapy vs. enucleation for posterior uveal melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol
. 1990;109:585–592.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Packer S, Stoller S, Lesser ML, Mandel FS, Finger PT. Long-term results of iodine 125 irradiation of uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology
. 1992;99:767–773.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Jensen OA. Malignant melanomas of the uvea in Denmark 1943–1952: a clinical, histopathological, and prognostic study. Acta Ophthalmol. 1963;75(suppl)1–220.
Boniuk M. Ocular and Adnexal Tumors. New and Controversial Aspects. 1964; CV Mosby St. Louis.
Hayreh SS. Choroidal melanomata: fluorescence angiographic and histopathological study. Br J Ophthalmol
. 1970;54:145–160.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Cantrill HL, Cameron JD, Ramsay RC, Knobloch WH. Retinal vascular changes in malignant melanoma of the choroid. Am J Ophthalmol
. 1984;97:411–418.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Mäkitie T, Summanen P, Tarkkanen A, Kivelä T. Microvascular loops and networks as prognostic indicators in choroidal and ciliary body melanomas. J Natl Cancer Inst
. 1999;91:359–367.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Fuchs U, Kivelä T, Summanen P, Immonen I, Tarkkanen A. An immunohistochemical and prognostic analysis of cytokeratin expression in malignant uveal melanoma. Am J Pathol
. 1992;141:169–181.
[PubMed]Kivelä T. Immunohistochemical staining followed by bleaching of melanin: a practical method for ophthalmic pathology. Br J Biomed Sci
. 1995;52:325–326.
[PubMed]Rohrbach JM, Steuhl KP, Kreissig I, Thiel HJ. Epidemiologie, Invasion und Wachstum nicht-iridaler Aderhautmelanome und assoziierte intraokulare Veränderungen: Histologische Untersuchung von 223 Augen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd
. 1990;197:455–465.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group. Histopathologic characteristics of uveal melanomas in eyes enucleated from the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study. COMS report no. 6. Am J Ophthalmol
. 1998;125:745–766.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Folberg R, Pe’er J, Gruman LM, et al. The morphologic characteristics of tumor blood vessels as a marker of tumor progression in primary human uveal melanoma: a matched case-control study. Hum Pathol
. 1992;23:1298–1305.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Folberg R, Rummelt V, Parys-van Ginderdeuren R, et al. The prognostic value of tumor blood vessel morphology in primary uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology
. 1993;100:1389–1398.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Ramani P, Bradley NJ, Fletcher CDM. QBEND/10, a new monoclonal antibody to endothelium: assessment of its diagnostic utility in paraffin sections. Histopathology
. 1990;17:237–242.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Mäkitie T, Summanen P, Tarkkanen A, Kivelä T. Microvascular density in predicting survival of patients with choroidal and ciliary body melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
. 1999;40:2471–2480.
[PubMed]Foss AJE, Alexander RA, Hungerford JL, Harris AL, Cree IA, Lightman S. Reassessment of the PAS patterns in uveal melanoma. Br J Ophthalmol
. 1997;81:240–246.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. 1991; Chapman & Hall London.
Lehmann EL. Nonparametrics. Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. 1975; Holden-Day San Francisco.
Hair JF, Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis. 1998; 5th ed. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Kleinbaum DG. Logistic Regression: a Self-Learning Text. 1992; Springer-Verlag New York.
Simon R, Altman DG. Statistical aspects of prognostic factor studies in oncology. Br J Cancer
. 1994;69:979–985.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Parmar MKB, Machin D. Survival Analysis. A Practical Approach. 1996; John Wiley & Sons Chichester, UK.
Kleinbaum DG. Survival Analysis: a Self-Learning Text. 1996; Springer-Verlag New York.
Küchle M, Nguyen NX, Naumann GO. Quantitative assessment of the blood-aqueous barrier in human eyes with malignant or benign uveal tumors. Am J Ophthalmol
. 1994;117:521–528.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Castella AP, Bercher L, Zografos L, Egger E, Herbort CP. Study of the blood-aqueous barrier in choroidal melanoma. Br J Ophthalmol
. 1995;79:354–357.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Negi A, Marmor MF. The resorption of subretinal fluid after diffuse damage to the retinal pigment epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
. 1983;24:1475–1479.
[PubMed]Anand R, Tasman WS, McNamara JA. Nonrhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Glaser BM Michels RG eds. Retina. 1989;565–589. Mosby St. Louis.
McMahon RT, Tso MO, McLean IW. Histologic localization of sodium fluorescein in choroidal malignant melanomas. Am J Ophthalmol
. 1977;83:836–846.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Damato BE, Foulds WS. Tumour-associated retinal pigment epitheliopathy. Eye
. 1990;4:382–387.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]McLean IW, Keefe KS, Burnier MN. Uveal melanoma: comparison of the prognostic value of fibrovascular loops, mean of the ten largest nucleoli, cell type, and tumor size. Ophthalmology
. 1997;104:777–780.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Seregard S, Spångberg B, Juul C, Oskarsson M. Prognostic accuracy of the mean of the largest nucleoli, vascular patterns, and PC-10 in posterior uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology
. 1998;105:485–491.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Maniotis AJ, Folberg R, Hess A, et al. Vascular channel formation by human melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro: vasculogenic mimicry. Am J Pathol
. 1999;155:739–752.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Folberg R, Hendrix MJC, Maniotis AJ. Vasculogenic mimicry and tumor angiogenesis. Am J Pathol
. 2000;156:361–381.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Weidner N. Tumoural vascularity as a prognostic factor in cancer patients: the evidence continues to grow. J Pathol
. 1998;184:119–122.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Silverman RH, Folberg R, Boldt HC, et al. Correlation of ultrasound parameter imaging with microcirculatory patterns in uveal melanomas. Ultrasound Med Biol
. 1997;23:573–581.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Mueller AJ, Freeman WR, Folberg R, et al. Evaluation of microvascularization pattern visibility in human choroidal melanomas: comparison of confocal fluorescein with indocyanine green angiography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
. 1999;237:448–456.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Hainsworth DP, Todd KC, Ranson NT, Gigantelli JW. Retinal vascular alterations associated with dome-shaped and mushroom-shaped choroidal melanomas [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(4)S380.Abstract nr 2006.
Negi A, Marmor MF. Experimental serous retinal detachment and focal pigment epithelial damage. Arch Ophthalmol
. 1984;102:445–449.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]