The expression profile of the prostanoid receptors and β-actin genes
in terms of absolute amounts
(Table 4) revealed a rather uniform expression profile in the TM samples. In all
samples β-actin was the most abundant (mean amount, 4660) followed in
all samples by EP
2 (1674) and at lower levels FP
(175), TP (156), EP
4 (136), IP (134),
EP
1 (105), DP (40), and EP
3 (9). The levels of β-actin again showed a significant inverse
correlation with age (
R 2 = 0.68;
P < 0.05;
Fig. 4 ), but the prostanoid receptor levels showed no such correlation. As
would be expected from these data, normalizing to the β-actin levels
enhanced the coefficient of variation, making such an approach
ineffective. For the final analysis, the total expression of the
prostanoid receptor genes was calculated
(Table 4) and set at 100%.
This total did not correlate with age
(
R 2 = 0.17). Subsequently, the
relative contributions as a fraction of this total of each prostanoid
receptor subtype were determined for each sample. This calculation
resulted in a clear reduction of the coefficient of variation. The
outcome of this analysis is presented in
Figure 5 . Statistical analysis showed significant differences in expression
between EP
3 and DP (0.4% ± 0.2% [mean ±
SD] vs. 1.8% ± 0.7%;
P < 0.00001, paired
Student’s
t-test), DP and EP
1 (1.8%±
0.7% vs. 4.4% ± 1.6%;
P < 0.00003), and
EP
1 and EP
4 (4.4% ± 1.6%
vs. 5.6% ± 2.2%;
P < 0.024). The levels of
EP
4 (5.6% ± 2.2%), IP (6.4% ± 2.6%), TP
(6.5% ± 3.3%), and FP (7.4% ± 2.7%) were not significantly
different from each other. The EP
2 levels (67.6%±
10.7%) were, on average, 10 times of that of FP, a highly
significant difference from all other prostanoid receptors
(
P < 0.00001).