November 2001
Volume 42, Issue 12
Free
Physiology and Pharmacology  |   November 2001
Effect of Endothelin and BQ123 on Ocular Blood Flow Parameters in Healthy Subjects
Author Affiliations
  • Kaija Polak
    From the Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and
    Ophthalmology and the
  • Vanessa Petternel
    From the Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and
    Ophthalmology and the
  • Alexandra Luksch
    From the Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and
  • Joachim Krohn
    From the Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and
  • Oliver Findl
    From the Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and
    Ophthalmology and the
  • Elzbieta Polska
    From the Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and
  • Leopold Schmetterer
    From the Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and
    Institute of Medical Physics Vienna University, Austria.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science November 2001, Vol.42, 2949-2956. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kaija Polak, Vanessa Petternel, Alexandra Luksch, Joachim Krohn, Oliver Findl, Elzbieta Polska, Leopold Schmetterer; Effect of Endothelin and BQ123 on Ocular Blood Flow Parameters in Healthy Subjects. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001;42(12):2949-2956.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

purpose. To characterize the role of the endothelin system in the blood flow control of the optic nerve head and of the choroid in humans.

methods. Two studies were performed in healthy subjects. Study 1 was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, balanced, two-way crossover design and study 2 a three way-way crossover design. In study 1 twelve healthy male subjects received endothelin (ET)-1 in stepwise increasing doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng/kg · min (each infusion step occurred over 20 minutes) coinfused with BQ123 (60μ g/kg · min) or placebo on two different study days. In study 2 twelve healthy male subjects received two doses of BQ123 (60 or 120μ g/kg · min over 60 minutes) or placebo on three different study days. Measurements of optic nerve head blood flow (ONHBF) and choroidal blood flow (ChBF) were performed with laser Doppler flowmetry in both studies. In study 2 mean flow velocity (MFV) of the ophthalmic artery was assessed with Doppler sonography.

results. In study 1, ET-1 significantly decreased ONHBF (−22.8% ± 4.3% at 5 ng/kg · min, P = 0.003 versus baseline) and ChBF (−21.7% ± 3.2% at 5 ng/kg · min, P = 0.0001 versus baseline). The effect of the highest administered dose of exogenous ET-1 on ONHBF was significantly attenuated (P = 0.04, ANOVA) by coinfusion of BQ123. Effects of exogenous ET-1 on blood flow (2.5 ng/kg · min ET-1 or higher) also were attenuated in the choroid by coinfusion of BQ123 (ChBF: P = 0.03, ANOVA). In study 2, both dosages of BQ123 significantly increased MFV in the ophthalmic artery (60 μg/kg · min, 12.5% ± 7.3%; 120 μg/kg · min, 17.2% ± 9.2%, versus baseline; P = 0.001), but did not change blood flow in the ONH or the choroid.

conclusions. BQ123 antagonizes the effects of exogenously administered ET-1 on blood flow in the ONH and the choroid. The data indicate, however, that ET-1 does not substantially contribute to the regulation of basal vascular tone in these tissues.

Endothelin (ET)-1 is a potent vasoactive peptide, mediating vasoconstriction mainly through the ETA receptor. 1 A number of studies have documented the importance of ET-1 in the eye, and ET-1 is now assumed to be a key regulator of ocular blood flow and to play a role in a variety of ocular diseases. There is a wide distribution of ET-1 in the eye with highest levels in the choroid. 2 ET-1 has been found to cause contraction of and to be mitogenic to pericytes and has therefore been suggested to play a role in endothelial cell–pericyte interactions within the retinal microvasculature and in retinal blood flow autoregulation. 3 4 Numerous in vitro and in vivo studies indicate the potent vasoconstrictor properties in retina, optic nerve head, and choroid in a variety of species. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  
There is now accumulating evidence of a role for ET-1 in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Aqueous humor ET-1 levels are higher in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma than in normal eyes. 14 This is compatible with the observation of increased ET-1 plasma concentrations in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. 16 17 Responsiveness to ET-1 in forearm microcirculation was shown to differ between patients with glaucoma and healthy control subjects, 15 whereas the physiological increase of ET-1 plasma concentrations in response to postural changes is blunted in patients with glaucoma. 18 It is interesting that ET-1 has also been shown to play an important role in the regulation of the outflow pathway in the anterior segment of the bovine eye. 19 ET-1 may therefore provide a link between reduced ocular blood flow and increased intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma. 
Because ET-1–related microvascular dysfunction may therefore be assumed to be associated with ocular perfusion abnormalities, a specific ETA receptor antagonist, such as BQ123, could provide a therapeutic option in ocular vascular diseases. BQ123 is a well characterized synthetic pentapeptide with high selectivity for the ETA receptor and high potency of ETA receptor antagonism. 20 21 22  
However, the effect of ETA receptor antagonists on the blood flow in ocular tissues in humans is unknown so far. In the present study we examined the effect in healthy subjects of two different doses of BQ123 on optic nerve head blood flow (ONHBF) and choroidal blood flow (ChBF) assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). In addition, we performed a study with exogenous administration of ET-1 to test whether BQ123 antagonizes ET-1 at the level of choroidal and optic nerve head circulation. 
Methods
Subjects
The present studies adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. After approval of the study protocol by the Ethics Committee of the Vienna University School of Medicine and after written informed consent was obtained, 12 healthy, nonsmoking male volunteers were enrolled in study 1 and 12 in study 2 (study 1: age range, 19–32 years; mean ± SD, 27.7 ± 4.7 years; study 2: age range, 20–35 years; mean ± SD, 26.9 ± 4.5 years). The groups of participants in the two studies were independent. All volunteers passed a prestudy screening during the 4 weeks before the first study day, which included physical examination and medical history, 12-lead electrocardiogram, complete blood cell count, clinical chemistry, urine analysis, random urine drug screen, and ophthalmic examination. Inclusion criteria were normal findings in the screening examinations and ametropia of less than 3 diopters (D). 
Experimental Design
Study 1.
The study was a balanced, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, two-way crossover design with a washout period of at least 4 days between the study days. According to this design, each subject received intravenous infusions of ET-1 (Clinalfa, Läufelingen, Switzerland; stepwise increasing doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng/kg · min, each infusion step occurring over 20 minutes) coinfused with BQ123 (Clinalfa; 60 μg/kg · min) into the antecubital vein on one study day and the same dosages of ET-1 in coinfusion with placebo (saline) on the other study day. 
Measurements of blood flow in the optic nerve head and in the choroid with LDF and of blood pressure were performed at baseline (8 minutes before the start of ET and BQ123 infusions) and during the last 8 minutes of each infusion step. Pulse rate (PR) and a real-time electrocardiogram (ECG) were monitored continuously as safety measures. PR and systemic blood pressure were obtained simultaneously and used in statistical analysis. 
Study 2.
This study was a balanced, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, three-way crossover design with a washout period of at least 4 days between the study days. Each subject received two doses of the ETA receptor antagonist BQ123 (either 60 or 120 μg/kg· min) or placebo. According to the 3-way crossover design, each subject was randomized to placebo and to both dosages of BQ123 on three different study days. All subjects were asked to refrain from consuming alcohol and caffeine for at least 12 hours before trial days and to consume a light breakfast on trial days. 
Baseline measurements of blood flow in the optic nerve head and in the choroid with LDF, of blood velocity in the ophthalmic artery, of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the contralateral eye, and of blood pressure and PR were performed 8 minutes before the beginning of infusion, after a 20-minute resting period with the subject in a sitting position. Thereafter, BQ123 or placebo was administered over 60 minutes. Measurements of the above-mentioned ocular hemodynamic parameters and of blood pressure were performed in 15-minute intervals after the start of the infusion. PR and a real-time ECG were monitored continuously as safety measures. PR and systemic blood pressure were obtained simultaneously and used in statistical analysis. 
Systemic Hemodynamics
Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure (SBP, DBP, MAP) were measured on the upper arm by an automated oscillometric device. PR was automatically recorded from a finger-pulse oximeter (HP-CMS patient monitor; Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA). Measurements of blood pressure and PR were single measurements, and the PR was determined from the average of five heart rate intervals. 
Laser Doppler Flowmetry
Assessment of choroidal and optic disc blood flow was performed by LDF (two-channel laser Doppler flowmeter; LDV-5000 System; Oculix Inc., Arbaz, Switzerland). 23 24 For this purpose the vascularized tissue was illuminated by coherent laser light, while the laser beam was directed away from visible vessels. Scattering by moving red blood cells (RBCs) leads to a frequency shift in the scattered light. In contrast, static scatterers in tissue do not change light frequency, but lead to randomization of light directions impinging on RBCs, offering a reference signal. This light diffusion in vascularized tissue leads to a broadening of the spectrum of scattered light. According to the theory of Bonner and Nossal, 25 three blood flow parameters are assessed with LDF. The parameter volume is proportional to the RBC volume per volume of tissue. The parameter velocity denotes the mean RBC speed within the scattering volume. The product of velocity and volume is the flow and is proportional to RBC flux. In the present study, LDF was performed in the neuroretinal rim to assess optic disc blood flow and in the fovea to assess ChBF. The averaging period of the measurements in optic disc and choroid was approximately 2 minutes, depending on the subject’s skill in fixation. 
Sonography of the Ophthalmic Artery
In the ophthalmic artery, peak systolic (PSV) velocity and end diastolic velocity (EDV) were measured. 26 From these parameters mean flow velocity (MFV; the integral of the Doppler curve/duration of the cardiac cycle) was calculated. All blood flow parameters are expressed in centimeters per second. The ophthalmic artery was measured anteriorly, at the point where it crosses the optic nerve, approximately 25 mm posterior the globe. Blood flow velocity was assessed with color Doppler imaging using a 7.5-MHz probe with a pulsed Doppler device and simultaneous ECG recording (CFM 750; Vingmed Sound, Horten, Norway). 
Measurement of IOP
IOP (in mm Hg) was measured with a handheld applanation tonometer (Perkins MK2; Clement Clarke, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK). 
Data Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by computer (Statistica for Windows; Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK). Data are presented as means ± SEM. P < 0.05 was considered the level of significance. 
Study 1.
The effect of ET-1 was compared with the effect of a coinfusion of ET-1 and BQ123 with repeated-measures ANOVA. Post hoc analysis for individual time points was performed with paired t-tests. The mean baseline value was taken as a covariable in the ANOVA model. The effects of individual doses of ET-1 versus baseline were also assessed by repeated-measures ANOVA. The effects of ET-1 or coinfusion of ET-1 and BQ123 on hemodynamic parameters are expressed as percentage of change from baseline. 
Study 2.
The effect of BQ123 or placebo on outcome parameters was assessed with repeated-measures ANOVA. The effects of BQ123 or placebo on hemodynamic parameters are expressed as the percentage of change from baseline. To estimate the short-term reproducibility of LDF measurements in the ONH and the choroid, the coefficient of variation was determined from each subject’s SD, using the five measurements obtained on the placebo day. The mean of these individual coefficients of variation is presented as a measure of short-term variability. 
Results
Study 1
No significant differences in ocular and systemic hemodynamic parameters were observed at baseline between study days (Table 1) . MAP remained unchanged during administration of ET-1, as well as during coinfusion of ET-1 and BQ123 (Table 2) . PR significantly decreased during administration of ET-1 (−6.6% ± 5.75% versus baseline) but not during coinfusion of ET-1 and BQ123 (Table 2) . Effects of BQ123 on ONHBF and ChBF are presented in Figures 1 and 2 , respectively. 
Optic Nerve Head.
Exogenous administration of ET-1 significantly decreased blood flow (with doses of 1.25 ng/kg · min or higher, at 5 ng/kg · min:− 22.8% ± 4.3%, P = 0.003 versus baseline) and blood volume (with doses of 2.5 ng/kg · min or higher, at 5 ng/kg · min:− 18.2% ± 5.3%, P = 0.03 versus baseline), but not velocity (at 5 ng/kg · min: −2.3% ± 6.9%, P = 0.8 versus baseline) in the ONH. The effect of exogenous ET-1 on ONHBF was significantly attenuated by coinfusion of BQ123 (P = 0.04, ANOVA). BQ123 antagonized changes of ONHBF induced by ET-1 at a dose of 5 ng/kg · min (P = 0.04). BQ123 antagonized changes of blood volume in the ONH induced by ET-1 at doses of 2.5 ng/kg · min (P = 0.02) or higher. The effect of ET-1 on RBC velocity in the ONH was not significantly affected by ETA receptor blockade (P = 0.22). Coinfusion of ET-1 and BQ123 slightly decreased blood flow (maximum effect: −10.9% ± 4.5% at 2.5 ng/kg · min ET-1, P = 0.04 versus baseline), but not volume or velocity in the ONH. 
Choroid.
Exogenous administration of ET-1 significantly decreased blood flow (with doses of 1.25 ng/kg · min or higher, at 5 ng/kg · min:− 21.7% ± 3.2%, P < 0.0001 versus baseline) and blood volume (with doses of 1.25 ng/kg · min or higher, at 5 ng/kg· min: −23.7% ± 3.4%, P < 0.0001 versus baseline) but not RBC velocity (P = 0.44) in the choroid. Effects of exogenous ET-1 on ChBF and blood volume were significantly attenuated by coinfusion of BQ123 (choroidal blood flow: P = 0.03, blood volume: P = 0.008, repeated-measures ANOVA). BQ123 antagonized changes of ChBF induced by ET-1 at doses of 2.5 ng/kg · min (P = 0.013) or higher. An antagonism of BQ123 on ET-1-induced changes in blood volume in the choroid was observed at doses of 1.25 ng/kg · min ET-1 (P = 0.01) or higher. The effect of exogenous ET-1 on RBC velocity in the choroid was not affected by coinfusion with BQ123 (P = 0.15). Coinfusion of ET-1 and BQ123 had no effect on flow (P = 0.66 versus baseline), volume (P = 0.77 versus baseline), or velocity (P = 0.72 versus baseline) in the choroid. 
Study 2
No significant differences of ocular and systemic hemodynamic parameters were observed at baseline between study days (Table 3) . Placebo had no consistent effect on systemic or ocular hemodynamic parameters. 
Mean blood pressure and PR were not significantly changed during administration of BQ123 (Table 4) . Coefficients of variation for the ocular hemodynamic parameters, calculated from the data of the placebo day, are presented in Table 5 . The reproducibility was comparable between LDF-measurements in the choroid and in the optic disc. 
Effects of BQ123 on MFV in the ophthalmic artery are illustrated in Figure 3 . Both doses of BQ123 significantly increased MFV in the ophthalmic artery (after 60 minutes of infusion: 60 μg/kg · min: 12.5% ± 7.3%; 120 μg/kg · min: 17.2% ± 9.2%, versus baseline; P = 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the effects of the lower and the higher doses of BQ123 on MFV (P = 0.94). 
Effects of BQ123 on hemodynamic parameters ONHBF and ChBF are presented in Figures 4 and 5 , respectively. In the ONH, blood flow (60 μg/kg · min: −0.9% ± 7.1%; 120 μg/kg · min: 1.6% ± 4.2%, versus baseline, P = 0.982), volume (60 μg/kg · min: 6.6% ± 8.5%; 120 μg/kg · min: −0.04% ± 5.2%, versus baseline, P = 0.575), and RBC velocity (60 μg/kg · min:− 2.1% ± 3.6%; 120 μg/kg · min: 3.1% ± 4.1% versus baseline; P = 0.479) did not change significantly after administration of BQ123 over 60 minutes. Similarly, blood flow (60μ g/kg · min: 6.7% ± 6.5%; 120 μg/kg · min: −0.3% ± 5.4%, versus baseline; P = 0.201), volume (60 μg/kg · min: 6.8% ± 6.9%; 120 μg/kg · min: 3.3% ± 6.5%, versus baseline; P = 0.173), and RBC velocity (60 μg/kg · min: −1.5% ± 2.3%; 120 μg/kg · min: −2.3% ± 1.7%, versus baseline; P = 0.274), in the choroid did not change significantly after administration of BQ123 over 60 minutes. IOP also remained unchanged during ETA receptor blockade (60 μg/kg · min: −2.7% ± 4.1%; 120 μg/kg · min: −2.0% ± 4.8%, versus baseline; P = 0.96). 
Discussion
The main finding of the present study is that ETA receptor blockade significantly increased mean blood velocity in the ophthalmic artery measured by color Doppler imaging but did not affect blood flow in the optic nerve head and in the choroid. In addition, ET-1 decreased blood flow in the optic nerve and the choroid, and BQ123 antagonized the effects of exogenously administered ET-1 at the level of the optic nerve head and choroidal circulation. 
Both dosages of BQ123 did not exert systemic hemodynamic changes, which is in accordance with previous studies. 27 28 Because there is no significant difference between the effects of the two dosages of BQ123 on MFV of the ophthalmic artery, it can be assumed that the maximum effect of BQ123 was obtained at 60 μg/kg · min. The increase of MFV in the ophthalmic artery during ETA receptor blockade indicates increased blood flow through this artery, because a BQ123-induced vasoconstriction is unlikely. Hence, we assume that ETA receptor blockade increased blood flow in the extraocular branches of the ophthalmic artery. Because only a small amount of blood flow in the ophthalmic artery contributes to the blood supply of the eye, an increase of blood flow in the ophthalmic artery does not necessarily reflect an increase in optic nerve head or choroidal blood flow. We have recently shown that the resistive index that is often used as a measure of distal vascular resistance is not valid in ocular vessels. 29 Hence, we decided to omit this parameter in the present study. 
An artificial increase of ET-1 by intravenous administration to healthy volunteers decreased blood flow in the optic disc in the present study. This extends previous findings by our group that administration of exogenous ET-1 decreases the fundus pulsation amplitude in the ONH. 13 The percentage of the decrease of tissue blood flow as assessed with LDF in the present study is comparable to the decrease of fundus pulsation amplitude assessed with laser interferometry as well as of ONH flow as assessed with scanning LDF (Heidelberg Retina Flowmeter; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). This may indicate that in the ONH, ET-1–induced changes in blood flow are mainly attributed to low-resistance vessels and to the capillary meshwork. This concept is further supported by our finding that in the ONH exogenous ET-1 administration induced a pronounced effect on blood volume but did not affect erythrocyte velocity. Our findings are compatible with animal studies in monkeys and rabbits, in which it was reported that chronic administration of ET-1 to the perineural region markedly decreased ONHBF and increased cupping and loss of perineural rim volume. 11 30  
Antagonistic effects between ET-1 and BQ123 were observed only at higher ET-1 doses in the present trial. Our dose regimen of ET-1 was based on previous clinical trials in which ET-1 infusions of 2.5 and 5 ng/kg · min induced an approximately 8- and 50-fold increase in plasma concentration, respectively. 31 We cannot exclude that ET-1 accumulated throughout the infusion period; however, it was not the intention of the study to characterize a dose–response curve of ET-1 and BQ123, which would also be difficult because of the complex pharmacodynamic actions of ET-1. 31  
In the ONH, endothelin receptor blockade did not influence blood volume, velocity, or flow. Therefore, it can be assumed that ET-1 does not play a major role in the regulation of basal vascular tone in the ONH. In the retina, BQ123 increased blood flow in diabetic and nondiabetic rats. 32 However, the presence of pericytes in the retinal microvasculature and the differences in blood supply to the anterior ONH by the posterior ciliary arteries may well account for the different effects of ETA receptor blockade in these tissues. 
As in the ONH, BQ123 did not influence blood volume, velocity, or flow, but attenuated the effects of ET-1 on flow and volume in the choroid. This is in accordance with a recent study 33 in rabbits that showed that ET-1 and ETB receptor blockade increases choroidal vascular resistance and causes a downward shift of the pressure–flow relationship in the choroid, whereas ETA receptor blockade alone has no influence. The investigators suggested that varying distribution of ETA and ETB receptors between the endothelial and the smooth muscle cells in the choroidal vasculature is responsible for this phenomenon. Similar to the present study, the effect of exogenous ET-1 on choroidal flow in rabbits was antagonized by ETA receptor blockade. In addition, the same group demonstrated that nonselective ET receptor blockade reverses the reduction in ChBF caused by nitric oxide synthase inhibition. 34 Based on these considerations the findings in the present study do not preclude that the ET system participates in the regulation of choroidal vascular tone at basal conditions in humans. However, it has to be considered that the choroid in the rabbit has substantially different features, compared with the human choroid. In addition, our study indicates that elevation of ET-1 levels may be involved in the pathogenesis of ocular vascular diseases. 
Our data are also in accordance with a recent study in normo- and hypertensive rats, 35 in which intravenous injection of BQ123 did not affect regional blood flow of the uvea. Although the choroid shows the highest density of ET receptors of all ocular tissues, 2 36 our findings indicate that ET-1 does not substantially contribute to the regulation of vascular tone at basal conditions. It should, however, be noted that a tendency toward an increase in choroidal blood flow was observed with infusion of BQ123 in the present study. Considering the reproducibility data presented in Table 5 , we cannot exclude an effect of ETA receptor blockade on choroidal hemodynamic parameters on the order of 12%. This limitation also holds true for LDF measurements in the ONH. Because all our subjects were specifically trained for LDF measurements, it is unlikely that changes smaller than that may be detected with this system in our laboratory. 
In the present study ETA receptor blockade was performed in healthy volunteers. However, elevation of ET-1 plasma levels may be involved in the pathogenesis of ocular vascular diseases such as open-angle and normal-tension glaucoma. 14 17 The effect of ETA receptor blockade on blood flow in ONHs in the latter diseases remains to be investigated. ETA receptor blockade may, however, be taken into consideration as a new approach to the treatment of ocular diseases with increased ET-1 levels. 
 
Table 1.
 
Baseline Parameters of Ocular and Systemic Hemodynamic Measurements at the Two Days of Study 1
Table 1.
 
Baseline Parameters of Ocular and Systemic Hemodynamic Measurements at the Two Days of Study 1
ET-1 ET-1+BQ123
MAP (mm Hg) 79.3 ± 2.7 79.5 ± 3.5
PR (bpm) 68.5 ± 3.4 65.3 ± 2.3
ONHBF (arbitrary units) 6.41 ± 0.65 5.75 ± 0.35
ONH Vol (arbitrary units) 0.20 ± 0.03 0.19 ± 0.03
ONH Vel (arbitrary units) 36.22 ± 4.34 34.64 ± 3.25
ChBF (arbitrary units) 6.65 ± 0.50 6.50 ± 0.44
Ch Vol (arbitrary units) 0.16 ± 0.02 0.15 ± 0.02
Ch Vel (arbitrary units) 44.95 ± 3.52 45.94 ± 3.38
Table 2.
 
Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters during the Two Days of Study 1
Table 2.
 
Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters during the Two Days of Study 1
Time (min) P
0 20 40 60
ET-1 (ng/kg·min) Baseline 1.25 2.5 5
MAP (mmHg)
ET-1 79.3 ± 2.7 78.7 ± 3.7 76.7 ± 1.7 78.8 ± 2.7 0.82
ET-1+ BQ123 79.5 ± 3.5 78.6 ± 3.1 76.6 ± 2.6 76.7 ± 2.5 0.85
PR (bpm)
ET-1 68.5 ± 3.4 61.7 ± 2.7 57.9 ± 2.3 63.1 ± 3.8 0.02
ET-1+ BQ123 65.3 ± 2.3 66.6 ± 3.9 65.9 ± 4.0 60.6 ± 3.3 0.37
Figure 1.
 
Study 1: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the optic nerve head during administration of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng/kg · min (○); coinfusion of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses with BQ123 at 60μ g/kg · min (▪). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 1.
 
Study 1: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the optic nerve head during administration of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng/kg · min (○); coinfusion of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses with BQ123 at 60μ g/kg · min (▪). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 2.
 
Study 1: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the choroid during administration of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng/kg · min (○); coinfusion of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses with BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 2.
 
Study 1: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the choroid during administration of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng/kg · min (○); coinfusion of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses with BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Table 3.
 
Baseline Parameters of Ocular and Systemic Hemodynamic Measurements of the Three Days of Study 2
Table 3.
 
Baseline Parameters of Ocular and Systemic Hemodynamic Measurements of the Three Days of Study 2
Placebo BQ123 (60 μg/min) BQ123 (120 μg/min)
MAP (mm Hg) 82.1 ± 2.3 84.1 ± 2.5 83.4 ± 2.4
PR (bpm) 71.4 ± 2.6 72.7 ± 3.8 77.8 ± 4.5
MFV (cm/sec) 22.8 ± 1.5 20.2 ± 1.8 18.3 ± 1.1
ONHBF (arbitrary units) 5.00 ± 0.31 4.87 ± 0.43 4.94 ± 0.34
ONH Vol (arbitrary units) 0.17 ± 0.02 0.16 ± 0.02 0.16 ± 0.02
ONH Vel (arbitrary units) 0.30 ± 0.02 0.33 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 0.02
ChBF (arbitrary units) 6.28 ± 0.60 6.31 ± 0.42 6.77 ± 0.56
Ch Vol (arbitrary units) 0.16 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.02
Ch Vel (arbitrary units) 0.44 ± 0.02 0.44 ± 0.02 0.46 ± 0.02
IOP (mm Hg) 11.2 ± 0.4 11.3 ± 0.4 11.9 ± 0.7
Table 4.
 
Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters during the Three Days of Study 2
Table 4.
 
Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters during the Three Days of Study 2
Time (min)
0 15 30 45 60
MAP (mm Hg)
Placebo 82.1 ± 2.3 84.4 ± 1.9 84.1 ± 2.1 83.2 ± 2.1 85.7 ± 1.9
BQ123 (60 μg/min) 84.1 ± 2.5 82.9 ± 2.6 82.2 ± 2.6 81.8 ± 2.2 80.9 ± 2.3
BQ123 (120 μg/min) 83.6 ± 2.4 83.5 ± 2.3 82.3 ± 2.0 82.0 ± 2.2 83.1 ± 1.8
PR (bpm)
Placebo 71.4 ± 2.6 66.0 ± 2.6 66.0 ± 2.7 65.3 ± 2.4 67.6 ± 3.2
BQ123 (60 μg/min) 72.7 ± 3.8 69.6 ± 3.1 67.3 ± 3.5 66.4 ± 3.5 65.2 ± 2.5
BQ123 (120 μg/min) 77.8 ± 4.5 70.0 ± 3.2 71.3 ± 2.5 70.2 ± 2.4 71.7 ± 2.4
Table 5.
 
Coefficient of Variation of LDF Measurements Assessed on the Placebo Day of Study 2
Table 5.
 
Coefficient of Variation of LDF Measurements Assessed on the Placebo Day of Study 2
Coefficient of Variation (%)
ONH
Flow 11.0
Volume 15.2
Velocity 8.9
Choroid
Flow 11.7
Volume 13.8
Velocity 6.1
Figure 3.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of MFV of the ophthalmic artery during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 3.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of MFV of the ophthalmic artery during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 4.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the optic nerve head during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 4.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the optic nerve head during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 5.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the choroid during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 5.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the choroid during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Rubanyi GM, Polokoff MA. Endothelins: molecular biology, biochemistry, pharmacology, physiology, and pathophysiology. Pharmacol Rev. 1994;46:325–415. [PubMed]
Chakravarthy U, Douglas AJ, Bailie JR, McKibben B, Archer DB. Immunoreactive endothelin distribution in ocular tissues. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2448–2454. [PubMed]
Chakravarthy U, Archer DB. Endothelin: a new vasoactive ocular peptide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:107–108. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ramachandran E, Frank RN, Kennedy A. Effects of endothelin on cultured bovine retinal microvascular pericytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:586–595. [PubMed]
Yao K, Tschudi M, Flammer J, Luscher TF. Endothelium-dependent regulation of vascular tone of the porcine ophthalmic artery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:1791–1798. [PubMed]
Haefliger IO, Flammer J, Luscher TF. Nitric oxide and endothelin-1 are important regulators of human ophthalmic artery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2340–2343. [PubMed]
Meyer P, Flammer J, Luscher TF. Endothelium-dependent regulation of the ophthalmic microcirculation in the perfused porcine eye: role of nitric oxide and endothelins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3614–3621. [PubMed]
Bursell SE, Clermont AC, Oren B, King GL. The in vivo effect of endothelins on retinal circulation in nondiabetic and diabetic rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:596–607. [PubMed]
Cioffi GA, Orgul S, Onda E, Bacon DR, Van Buskirk EM. An in vivo model of chronic optic nerve ischemia: the dose-dependent effects of endothelin-1 on the optic nerve microvasculature. Curr Eye Res. 1995;14:1147–1153. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schmetterer L, Findl O, Strenn K, et al. Effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) on ocular hemodynamics. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:687–692. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Orgul S, Cioffi GA, Bacon DR, Van Buskirk EM. An endothelin-1-induced model of chronic optic nerve ischemia in rhesus monkeys. J Glaucoma. 1996;5:135–138. [PubMed]
Sugiyama T, Azuma I. Effect of UF-021 on optic nerve head circulation in rabbits. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1995;39:124–129. [PubMed]
Strenn K, Matulla B, Wolzt M, et al. Reversal of endothelin-1-induced ocular hemodynamic effects by low-dose nifedipine in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998;63:54–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tezel G, Kass MA, Kolker AE, Becker B, Wax MB. Plasma and aqueous humor endothelin levels in primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:83–89. [PubMed]
Gass A, Flammer J, Linder L, Romerio SC, Gasser P, Haefeli WE. Inverse correlation between endothelin-1-induced peripheral microvascular vasoconstriction and blood pressure in glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997;235:634–638. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sugiyama T, Moriya S, Oku H, Azuma I. Association of endothelin-1 with normal tension glaucoma: clinical and fundamental studies. Surv Ophthalmol. 1995;39(suppl 1)S49–S56. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cellini M, Possati GL, Profazio V, Sbrocca M, Caramazza N, Caramazza R. Color Doppler imaging and plasma levels of endothelin-1 in low-tension glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 1997;224:11–13. [PubMed]
Kaiser HJ, Flammer J, Wenk M, Luscher T. Endothelin-1 plasma levels in normal-tension glaucoma: abnormal response to postural changes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995;233:484–488. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wiederholt M, Bielka S, Schweig F, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Lepple-Wienhues A. Regulation of outflow rate and resistance in the perfused anterior segment of the bovine eye. Exp Eye Res. 1995;61:223–234. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ishikawa K, Fukami T, Nagase T, et al. Cyclic pentapeptide endothelin antagonists with high ETA selectivity: potency- and solubility-enhancing modifications. J Med Chem. 1992;35:2139–2142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ihara M, Ishikawa K, Fukuroda T, et al. In vitro biological profile of a highly potent novel endothelin (ET) antagonist BQ-123 selective for the ETA receptor. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;20:S11–S14.
Benigni A, Remuzzi G. Endothelin antagonists. Lancet. 1999;353:133–138. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Riva CE, Cranstoun SD, Grunwald JE, Petrig BL. Choroidal blood flow in the foveal region of the human ocular fundus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:4273–4281. [PubMed]
Riva CE, Harino S, Petrig BL, Shonat RD. Laser Doppler flowmetry in the optic nerve. Exp Eye Res. 1992;55:499–506. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bonner RF, Nossal R. Principles of laser-Doppler flowmetry. In: Shepherd AP, Oberg PA, eds. Laser-Doppler Blood Flowmetry: Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990:chap 2.
Lieb WE, Cohen SM, Merton DA, Shields JA, Mitchell DG, Goldberg BB. Color Doppler imaging of the eye and orbit: technique and normal vascular anatomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:527–531. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schmetterer L, Dallinger S, Bobr B, Selenko N, Eichler HG, Wolzt M. Systemic and renal effects of an ET(A) receptor subtype-specific antagonist in healthy subjects. Br J Pharmacol. 1998;124:930–934. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dallinger S, Dorner GT, Wenzel R, et al. Endothelin-1 contributes to hyperoxia-induced vasoconstriction in the human retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:864–869. [PubMed]
Polska E, Kircher K, Ehrlich P, Vecsei P, Schmetterer L. Resistive index in central retinal artery as assessed by color Doppler imaging does not correspond to retinal vascular resistance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;280:H1442–H1447. [PubMed]
Orgul S, Cioffi GA, Wilson DJ, Bacon DR, Van Buskirk EM. An endothelin-1 induced model of optic nerve ischemia in the rabbit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1860–1869. [PubMed]
Vierhapper H, Wagner O, Nowotny P, Waldhausl W. Effect of endothelin-1 in man. Circulation. 1990;81:1415–1418. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Takagi C, Bursell SE, Lin YW, et al. Regulation of retinal hemodynamics in diabetic rats by increased expression and action of endothelin-1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2504–2518. [PubMed]
Kiel JW. Endothelin modulation of choroidal blood flow in the rabbit. Exp Eye Res. 2000;71:543–550. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kiel JW. Modulation of choroidal autoregulation in the rabbit. Exp Eye Res. 1999;69:413–429. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Granstam SO, Lind L, Granstam E, Fellstrom B. Effects of nitric oxide synthase inhibition and endothelin ETA receptor blockade on haemodynamics in hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998;25:693–701. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stitt AW, Chakravarthy U, Gardiner TA, Archer DB. Endothelin-like immunoreactivity and receptor binding in the choroid and retina. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15:111–117. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
 
Study 1: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the optic nerve head during administration of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng/kg · min (○); coinfusion of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses with BQ123 at 60μ g/kg · min (▪). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 1.
 
Study 1: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the optic nerve head during administration of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng/kg · min (○); coinfusion of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses with BQ123 at 60μ g/kg · min (▪). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 2.
 
Study 1: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the choroid during administration of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng/kg · min (○); coinfusion of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses with BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 2.
 
Study 1: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the choroid during administration of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng/kg · min (○); coinfusion of ET-1 in stepwise increasing doses with BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 3.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of MFV of the ophthalmic artery during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 3.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of MFV of the ophthalmic artery during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 4.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the optic nerve head during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 4.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the optic nerve head during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 5.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the choroid during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Figure 5.
 
Study 2: Percentage change from baseline of RBC flow, volume, and velocity in the choroid during administration of placebo (○), BQ123 at 60 μg/kg · min (▪), or 120 μg/kg · min (▾). Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). Statistical significance: #, versus baseline; *, between treatments.
Table 1.
 
Baseline Parameters of Ocular and Systemic Hemodynamic Measurements at the Two Days of Study 1
Table 1.
 
Baseline Parameters of Ocular and Systemic Hemodynamic Measurements at the Two Days of Study 1
ET-1 ET-1+BQ123
MAP (mm Hg) 79.3 ± 2.7 79.5 ± 3.5
PR (bpm) 68.5 ± 3.4 65.3 ± 2.3
ONHBF (arbitrary units) 6.41 ± 0.65 5.75 ± 0.35
ONH Vol (arbitrary units) 0.20 ± 0.03 0.19 ± 0.03
ONH Vel (arbitrary units) 36.22 ± 4.34 34.64 ± 3.25
ChBF (arbitrary units) 6.65 ± 0.50 6.50 ± 0.44
Ch Vol (arbitrary units) 0.16 ± 0.02 0.15 ± 0.02
Ch Vel (arbitrary units) 44.95 ± 3.52 45.94 ± 3.38
Table 2.
 
Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters during the Two Days of Study 1
Table 2.
 
Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters during the Two Days of Study 1
Time (min) P
0 20 40 60
ET-1 (ng/kg·min) Baseline 1.25 2.5 5
MAP (mmHg)
ET-1 79.3 ± 2.7 78.7 ± 3.7 76.7 ± 1.7 78.8 ± 2.7 0.82
ET-1+ BQ123 79.5 ± 3.5 78.6 ± 3.1 76.6 ± 2.6 76.7 ± 2.5 0.85
PR (bpm)
ET-1 68.5 ± 3.4 61.7 ± 2.7 57.9 ± 2.3 63.1 ± 3.8 0.02
ET-1+ BQ123 65.3 ± 2.3 66.6 ± 3.9 65.9 ± 4.0 60.6 ± 3.3 0.37
Table 3.
 
Baseline Parameters of Ocular and Systemic Hemodynamic Measurements of the Three Days of Study 2
Table 3.
 
Baseline Parameters of Ocular and Systemic Hemodynamic Measurements of the Three Days of Study 2
Placebo BQ123 (60 μg/min) BQ123 (120 μg/min)
MAP (mm Hg) 82.1 ± 2.3 84.1 ± 2.5 83.4 ± 2.4
PR (bpm) 71.4 ± 2.6 72.7 ± 3.8 77.8 ± 4.5
MFV (cm/sec) 22.8 ± 1.5 20.2 ± 1.8 18.3 ± 1.1
ONHBF (arbitrary units) 5.00 ± 0.31 4.87 ± 0.43 4.94 ± 0.34
ONH Vol (arbitrary units) 0.17 ± 0.02 0.16 ± 0.02 0.16 ± 0.02
ONH Vel (arbitrary units) 0.30 ± 0.02 0.33 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 0.02
ChBF (arbitrary units) 6.28 ± 0.60 6.31 ± 0.42 6.77 ± 0.56
Ch Vol (arbitrary units) 0.16 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.02
Ch Vel (arbitrary units) 0.44 ± 0.02 0.44 ± 0.02 0.46 ± 0.02
IOP (mm Hg) 11.2 ± 0.4 11.3 ± 0.4 11.9 ± 0.7
Table 4.
 
Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters during the Three Days of Study 2
Table 4.
 
Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters during the Three Days of Study 2
Time (min)
0 15 30 45 60
MAP (mm Hg)
Placebo 82.1 ± 2.3 84.4 ± 1.9 84.1 ± 2.1 83.2 ± 2.1 85.7 ± 1.9
BQ123 (60 μg/min) 84.1 ± 2.5 82.9 ± 2.6 82.2 ± 2.6 81.8 ± 2.2 80.9 ± 2.3
BQ123 (120 μg/min) 83.6 ± 2.4 83.5 ± 2.3 82.3 ± 2.0 82.0 ± 2.2 83.1 ± 1.8
PR (bpm)
Placebo 71.4 ± 2.6 66.0 ± 2.6 66.0 ± 2.7 65.3 ± 2.4 67.6 ± 3.2
BQ123 (60 μg/min) 72.7 ± 3.8 69.6 ± 3.1 67.3 ± 3.5 66.4 ± 3.5 65.2 ± 2.5
BQ123 (120 μg/min) 77.8 ± 4.5 70.0 ± 3.2 71.3 ± 2.5 70.2 ± 2.4 71.7 ± 2.4
Table 5.
 
Coefficient of Variation of LDF Measurements Assessed on the Placebo Day of Study 2
Table 5.
 
Coefficient of Variation of LDF Measurements Assessed on the Placebo Day of Study 2
Coefficient of Variation (%)
ONH
Flow 11.0
Volume 15.2
Velocity 8.9
Choroid
Flow 11.7
Volume 13.8
Velocity 6.1
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×