Frozen sections were thawed for 4 minutes on a 37°C
slide-warming plate. Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubating the
sections for 60 minutes on a shaker at room temperature with 10%
normal goat serum in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% Triton
X-100. The sections were then incubated for 24 hours on a shaker at
4°C in a mixture of primary antibodies
(Table 1) diluted in 0.1 M TBS containing 1% normal goat serum (diluent).
To provide localization to a single photoreceptor, one of
the polyclonal (poly) cone opsin antibodies was mixed with a monoclonal
antibody (mAb), or the mAb OS2 to S opsin was mixed with PDE. The
sections were washed overnight in TBS-0.1% Triton X-100 and then
incubated in biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100 in diluent) for
45 minutes at 37°C, washed in TBS-0.1% Triton X-100 twice for 30
minutes each, incubated in a mixture of avidin Texas red (1:1000 in
diluent) and goat anti-mouse IgG fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC,
1:100 in diluent) for 45 minutes at 37°C, thoroughly washed, and
coverslipped (VectaShield; Vector, Burlingame, CA).
Before starting this study of fetal retina, it was necessary to
determine the range or specificity of each antibody (the degree to
which an antibody labels only the protein being studied) and the
sensitivity (relative ability of an antibody to detect a low level of
its antigen). First, we used antibodies
(Table 1) that are well
characterized in the literature and that have good sensitivity and
specificity in detecting OS proteins in mature photoreceptors.
Although there has been no previous characterization of some of these
antibodies in the developing retina, it is reasonable to assume
comparable sensitivity and specificity in fetal retina. Second, we
performed a dilution series of these antibodies in
Macaca retina to confirm labeling patterns and optimal antibody
concentrations. Fetal retinas then were tested with a narrower range
around each optimal concentration. The antibody concentrations listed
in
Table 1 are those that were found to give the highest specific
signal-to-background labeling in fetal retina. Third, no attempt was
made to determine the quantity of protein present. Although it seems
reasonable that increased immunocytochemical labeling intensity over
time at the same antibody concentration suggests an increase, other
factors make quantitative interpretation difficult. Rather, in a given
microscope field, the protein was either present, defined as detection
of a minimal level of specific immunofluorescence, or absent. Finally,
for each antibody, at least 10 sections per retina were stained and
analyzed. This large number decreased individual variability and
resulted in highly reproducible data.