In the experiments in the present study, we examined the effects
of VEGF on retinal endothelial cell glucose transport and GLUT1
abundance in an in vitro model of the inner BRB. Our results
demonstrate that in addition to its effects on retinal endothelial cell
proliferation and microvascular permeability, VEGF had the ability to
upregulate retinal microvascular glucose transport and that it did so
through activation of PKC and in particular, the β isoform. This
enhancement of glucose transport is observed at concentrations similar
to those reported in the vitreous of patients with proliferative
diabetic retinopathy
25 ; however, because intraretinal
production of VEGF occurs in cells that are contiguous to the retinal
capillary endothelia, such as the Müller cells,
29 and perhaps even occurs in an autocrine manner by endothelial cells
themselves,
51 intravitreal VEGF concentrations may
actually represent an underestimation of the levels of VEGF to which
the retinal endothelial cells are exposed within the living retina.
Therefore, it is possible that the concentrations of VEGF used in these
studies may be present within the retina before the onset of
proliferative retinopathy.
The effect of VEGF on retinal endothelial cell glucose transport is not
that of a nonspecific response of cellular metabolism to a mitogen.
Although mitogenic factors such as basic fibroblast growth factor
(bFGF), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α,
52 53 phorbol
esters,
44 and transformation
54 are known to
cause increased glucose transport and/or GLUT1 abundance in a variety
of cell types, glucose transport in endothelial cells is not responsive
to insulin,
53 55 which acts as a major growth factor in
the central nervous system during development.
56 Indeed,
GLUT1, which is the predominant glucose transporter in the inner BRB in
vivo,
9 10 11 12 is not insulin sensitive.
14 Given
evidence that VEGF may act as a survival factor in the retina during
development,
57 the ability of VEGF to regulate endothelial
cell glucose transport in conjunction with proliferation may serve to
ensure adequate substrate delivery as well as blood flow during
development. Maintenance of adequate nutrient transport to the retina
during development and after maturation is of critical importance,
because neuroretinal metabolism is completely dependent on glucose.
VEGF increases retinal endothelial cell glucose transport, not through
an increase in total cellular GLUT1 transcript and protein, but by an
apparent translocation of preexisting cytoplasmic transporters to the
plasma membrane
(Fig. 3) . In this sense, the actions of VEGF on GLUT1
are similar to those of insulin on GLUT4 in insulin-sensitive
tissues.
58 The VEGF-stimulated increase in glucose
transport in the absence of an increase in total cellular abundance of
GLUT1 in retinal endothelial cells is in apparent contrast to its
effects on primary cultures of bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs),
in which exposure to comparable concentrations of VEGF results in an
approximate threefold increase in 2-deoxyglucose uptake and a fivefold
increase in GLUT1 transcript.
53 In the present studies,
exposure of BREC to VEGF at comparable concentrations for up to 24
hours did not result in a statistically significant difference in GLUT1
mRNA compared with control cultures
(Fig. 2C) . Differential effects of
VEGF on aortic and retinal endothelial cells were not directly compared
in these studies, which concentrated on the effects of this cytokine on
glucose transport in a microvascular endothelial cell type associated
with diabetic complications. Nonetheless, one may speculate that the
discrepancy in the results of the present study with those reported by
Pekala et al.
53 may be due to inherent differences in
endothelia isolated from microvascular versus macrovascular sources. In
this regard, Thieme et al.
59 have demonstrated that
although BRECs and BAECs possess the same types of high-affinity
receptors for VEGF, BRECs possess a threefold higher density of these
receptors than do BAECs. The differences in VEGF receptor abundance, or
perhaps the relative levels of expression of the different receptors
for VEGF, in retinal and aortic endothelia may account for the
different VEGF-mediated responses in glucose transport and GLUT1
expression in these two cell types.
Activation of PKC by hyperglycemia, presumably through de novo
synthesis by diacyl glycerol, has been proposed as one of the principal
biochemical pathways responsible for the development of diabetic
microvascular complications.
3 The actions of VEGF in
binding to its receptors on endothelial cell membranes are in part
mediated by activation of PKC.
46 These actions include
changes in retinal blood flow,
32 microvascular
permeability,
47 and endothelial cell
mitogenesis.
46 The present study demonstrates that
VEGF-mediated increases in retinal endothelial cell glucose transport
occur through activation of PKC. This conclusion is supported by
increased localization of PKC to the plasma membrane in VEGF-stimulated
BREC cultures
(Fig. 4) and abrogation of VEGF-stimulated increases in
glucose transport by depletion of PKC intracellular stores
(Fig. 5A) and by generalized inhibition of PKC
(Fig. 5B) . The observation of the
present study that VEGF increases PKC activity in BREC cultures is in
close agreement with that of Xia et al.,
46 who have
documented similar effects in bovine aortic endothelial cells.
Furthermore, the demonstration of the ability of the β
isoform–selective inhibitor LY379196 to abolish VEGF-stimulated
increases in BREC glucose transport
(Fig. 5B) suggests that VEGF’s
actions in modulating retinal endothelial glucose transport are
mediated by PKC-β, the PKC isoform that is thought to be responsible
for characteristic changes in retinal blood flow
45 and
microvascular permeability
47 observed in experimental
models of diabetes.
The principal factors modulating retinal endothelial cell GLUT1
expression have yet to be fully elucidated. In a recent publication,
Takagi et al.
22 have demonstrated that hypoxia causes an
eightfold increase in GLUT1 mRNA and two- and threefold increases in
2-deoxyglucose transport and immunoreactive GLUT1, respectively, in
BREC cultures after a 12-hour exposure to hypoxic conditions. With
regard to the direct effect of glucose on retinal endothelial glucose
transport and GLUT1 expression, Mandarino et al.
60 have
reported no change in 3MG transport in BREC cultures exposed to
elevated glucose concentrations for 5 days. In Mandarino et al.,
however, changes in the abundance of BREC GLUT1 mRNA and protein were
not reported. Nonetheless, focal upregulated immunoreactive GLUT1
expression has been documented in the human diabetic inner
BRB.
21
Because hyperglycemia per se does not appear to cause an increase in
glucose transport nor in GLUT1 expression, it is unlikely that
hyperglycemia-mediated changes in glucose transport and/or GLUT1
expression represent the initiating event in the molecular processes
underlying the development of DR. Although speculative at this point,
it is possible that in the setting of long-standing diabetes,
interactions of growth factors or advanced glycation end products with
their respective endothelial cell receptors
61 62 or the
interaction of these receptors with cell surface
integrins
63 64 may initiate processes that upregulate
glucose transport and GLUT1 expression on the endothelial cell surface.
This increase in glucose flux into the endothelia of the inner BRB may
have toxic effects on the endothelial cells by exposure of the
intracellular environment to elevated glucose concentrations. We
propose that hypoxia, elevated VEGF production, and other as yet
unidentified factors associated with the development of diabetic
retinopathy contribute to causing an upregulation of glucose transport
in the endothelial cells of the diabetic inner BRB and that this
enhancement exacerbates the deleterious effects of hyperglycemia on the
retinal microvasculature.
16
The authors thank Christin Carter-Su for her gift of anti-GLUT1
antisera; [14C]-3MG, Kirk Ways and Eli Lilly & Co. for
the LY379196 inhibitor; Rubén J. Boado for the bovine BBB
GLUT1 cDNA; and Michael J. Getz for the mouse actin cDNA. The authors
are indebted to Frank C. Brosius, III, Christin Carter-Su, Douglas
A. Greene, Rubén J. Boado and Dennis Larkin for
invaluable discussions and advice, and to Kathleen Britton for
technical assistance.