The distance between two adjacent CMTF images Δ
d,
i.e., the sampling interval of the
z-axis intensity curve,
is determined by the focal plane speed,
v f , and the frame rate,
r,
which is
\[{\Delta}d{=}\ \frac{v_{f}}{r}.\]
The focal plane speed can be precisely calculated from the lens
movement speed by a third-order polynomial equation provided by the
manufacturer, which is slightly nonlinear. When using the standard
frame rate and a lens speed of 160 μm/sec, the average focal plane
speed is approximately 64 μm/sec, and Δ
d is
approximately 2.12 μm. To differentiate structures more finely in the
z-axis, it is necessary to have a smaller Δ
d.
Obviously, lower focal plane speed results in a smallerΔ
d, but more unexpected movement of the subject cornea
will be included as the scan time is increased. Thus, there is a trade
off between CMTF focal plane speed and CMTF sampling interval.
Using a property of NTSC video format, we found a way to halveΔ
d by effectively doubling the frame rate
r. In
the NTSC standard, the video signal is in an interlaced format. A
single video frame (1/30 second) is broken up into an odd field (1/60
second) and an even field (1/60 second), coming one after another in
the camera output. The odd field is made up of the odd horizontal lines
of the frame and the even field is made up of the even lines. By
default, the image acquisition board digitizes the interlaced video
signal and outputs the entire frame by combining the odd and even
fields. However, this digitizing process is programmable. Normally CMTF
images are acquired by subsampling every other pixel of the full video
image in both the
x and
y directions, resulting
in a frame 320 × 240 pixels in size (
Fig. 4A ). If the image acquisition board is programmed to sample all pixels in
the
y direction, but to subsample in the
x direction, the digitized frame will have pixel data from every row and
every other column of the full frame. By “de-interlacing” the rows
of this 320 × 480 pixel frame, we obtain two half-size frames
containing pixels from only the odd and even fields, respectively, and
the CMTF image sampling rate is thus doubled
(Fig. 4B) . As expected,
smooth transitions between the odd and even data points in the
de-interlaced CMTF scans were observed, demonstrating the validity of
the approach. Using this technique, high measurement precision can
theoretically be obtained even when using faster scan rates, which
could minimize potential motion artifacts during a scan.