To compare the actual masses of mouse crystallins and calculated
masses based on the reported cDNA sequences, the masses of individual
HPLC-separated or gel-eluted crystallins from 6-week-old mice were
measured by ESIMS
(Table 1) . The measured masses of all HPLC-purified α- andβ
-crystallins matched the theoretical masses derived from published
cDNA sequences within an instrumental error of three mass units. This
suggested that the reported sequences of these crystallins matched the
sequences found in FVB/N mice. βA1-crystallin was not obtained in
sufficient purity by HPLC to determine its mass. However, the mass ofβ
A1 eluted from 2-DE gels differed by only 0.8 mass units from the
theoretical mass
(Table 1) , again suggesting that the reported sequence
was identical.
When purified γ-crystallins were similarly analyzed by ESIMS,
proteins matching the predicted masses of mouse γA-, γB-,γ
C-, γE-, and γS-crystallins were identified. However, the
measured mass of 20,958.5 for γD was 81.2 mass units higher than the
theoretical mass. This mass of HPLC-purified γD was confirmed by
analysis of γD eluted from 2-DE gels. Because of alkylation,
gel-purified γD had a mass of 21,357.8. Because γD reportedly
contains seven cysteines, the corresponding nonalkylated mass was
20,958.1, which closely matched the mass of HPLC-purified γD. These
data indicate that the sequence of γD-crystallin in FVB/N mice was
different from the previously reported murine γD sequence (Swiss Prot
accession no. P04342; provided by the Swiss Institute of
Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland, and available at
http://www.expasy.org at no charge to academic users). A protein
matching the theoretical mass for γF-crystallin was not detected by
either method. However, in HPLC fractions, the identity of two species
with masses of 20,916 and 20,974 could not be determined.