Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 41, Issue 11
October 2000
Volume 41, Issue 11
Free
Lens  |   October 2000
A Nonsense Mutation (W9X) in CRYAA Causes Autosomal Recessive Cataract in an Inbred Jewish Persian Family
Author Affiliations
  • Eran Pras
    From the Department of Ophthalmology, Sapir Medical Center, Kfar Saba; and the
  • Moshe Frydman
    Institute of Human Genetics, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. Both institutions are affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
  • Etgar Levy–Nissenbaum
    Institute of Human Genetics, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. Both institutions are affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
  • Tengiz Bakhan
    Institute of Human Genetics, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. Both institutions are affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
  • Judith Raz
    From the Department of Ophthalmology, Sapir Medical Center, Kfar Saba; and the
  • Ehud I. Assia
    From the Department of Ophthalmology, Sapir Medical Center, Kfar Saba; and the
  • Boleslaw Goldman
    Institute of Human Genetics, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. Both institutions are affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
  • Elon Pras
    Institute of Human Genetics, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. Both institutions are affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science October 2000, Vol.41, 3511-3515. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Eran Pras, Moshe Frydman, Etgar Levy–Nissenbaum, Tengiz Bakhan, Judith Raz, Ehud I. Assia, Boleslaw Goldman, Elon Pras; A Nonsense Mutation (W9X) in CRYAA Causes Autosomal Recessive Cataract in an Inbred Jewish Persian Family. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000;41(11):3511-3515.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

purpose. To identify the genetic defect causing autosomal recessive cataract in two inbred families.

methods. Linkage analysis was performed with polymorphic markers close to 14 loci previously shown to be involved in autosomal dominant congenital cataract. In one of the families a gene segregating with the disease was analyzed by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and eventually sequenced.

results. Three polymorphic markers close to the CRYAA gene located on chromosome 21q segregated with the disease phenotype in one of the families, but not in the other. Sequencing of the CRYAA in this Jewish Persian family revealed a G-to-A substitution, resulting in the formation of a premature stop codon (W9X).

conclusions. A nonsense mutation in the CRYAA gene causes autosomal recessive cataract in one family. This constitutes the first description of the molecular defect underlying nonsyndromic autosomal recessive congenital cataract. That there was no linkage to this locus in another family provides evidence for genetic heterogeneity.

Congenital cataracts are a major cause of blindness in infants, with an estimated incidence of 1 to 6 per 10,000 live births. 1 At least a third of the cases are familial, most often inherited in a nonsyndromic autosomal dominant fashion. A wide phenotypic variability evident by the formation of opacities in different compartments of the lens, is consistent with the large number of distinct loci that have already been described in autosomal dominant congenital cataract. The crystallin proteins constitute 80% to 90% of the soluble proteins in the lens and are divided into three groups,α , β, and γ. 2 The crystallins constitute a major component of the cellular cytoplasm needed for the transparency of the lens. This requires their refractive index to be relatively constant over distances approximating the wave length of the transmitted light, and therefore, maintenance of a high degree of short-range order among the crystallins is needed. 3 Recently, some of the crystallins were also shown to have enzymatic activity. 4 Because fiber cells in the central lens nucleus lose their nuclei during development, the crystallins in these cells do not turn over and thus must be extremely stable proteins. 2 The transparency of the lens also depends on a variety of noncrystallin proteins, which include various enzymes such as those involved in the glutathione redox cycle and the mercapturic acid pathway, 5 and components of the lens cytoskeleton and membrane proteins such as MP-26, aquaporins, connexins, and N-cadherins. 6 Each component of these systems could cause hereditary cataract. 
Mutations in five different crystallin genes (or clusters) have been identified as the cause of dominant disease. These include: CRYAA, 7 CRYAB, 8 9 CRYBA, 10 CRYBB, 11 and mutations within theγ -crystallin gene cluster at 2q34. 12 Two gap junction gene mutations were identified, GJA8 at 1q21.1 13 and GJA3 at 13q11-12. 14 In addition, in seven families the disease locus has been mapped by linkage studies, but the disease-causing gene has not yet been cloned. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 All together, 14 disease loci have been identified in autosomal dominant congenital cataract. 
Despite the progress that has been made in understanding the molecular basis of autosomal dominant congenital cataract, no loci or genes in humans has been identified in the autosomal recessive form of the disease. An autosomal recessive cataract has been previously linked to the Ii blood group, but the chromosomal location of Ii is not known. 22 In this report, we present data showing that a nonsense mutation in the human α-crystallin gene (CRYAA), is responsible for an autosomal recessive form of the disease in an inbred Jewish Persian family. In an additional Arab Muslim family we have ruled out this gene as the cause of the disease, thus providing evidence for genetic heterogeneity in the autosomal recessive form of the disease. 
Methods
Families and DNA Specimens
Families were recruited at the Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, and Sapir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel. Participants gave informed consent to the study protocol, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, and which conformed with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Disease was diagnosed in affected individuals within a few weeks after birth, and the patients were operated on during the first 3 months of life. No details of the pathologic findings in the lens were available. Ophthalmic examination of the parents and unaffected siblings in both families did not reveal any ocular abnormalities. Twenty milliliters of heparinized blood was obtained from each participant, and DNA was extracted using a commercial kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN). 
Genotyping and SSCP Analysis
Markers used in this study included: D11S1986, D11S1998 (for CRYAB); D21S2055, D21S226, and D21S1446 (for CRYAA); and D1S1597, D1S3669, D1S1653, D1S1679, D2S1384, D2S434, D3S2460, D3S1764, D3S1311, D13S787, D14S587, D14S592, D16S2624, D16S539, D17S1308, D17S2196, D17S1294, D17S2193, D17S784, and D22S420 for the additional 12 loci described in autosomal dominant cataract. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Amplification was performed in a 10-μl reaction volume containing 50 ng of DNA, 13.4 ng of each unlabeled primer, 1.5 mM each dNTP, and 0.08 μg 32P-labeled primer in 1.5 mM MgCl2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) buffer, with 1.2 U Taq polymerase (Bio-Line, London, UK). After an initial denaturation of 5 minutes at 95°C, 31 cycles were performed at 94°C for 2 minutes, 52°C for 3 minutes, and 72°C for 1 minute, followed by a final extension time of 7 minutes at 72°C. Samples were mixed with 10 μl of loading buffer, denatured at 95°C for 5 minutes and electrophoresed on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of the CRYAA gene was performed by amplifying exons 1, 2, and 3 using the primers 5′-CTCCAGGTCCCCGTGGTACCA-3′ and 5′-GCGAGGAGAGGCCAGCACCAC-3′, 5′-CTGTCTCTGCCAACCCCAGCAG-3′ and 5′-CCCCTGTCCCACCTCTCAGTGCC-3′, 5′-GGGGAGCCAGCCGAGGCAATG-3′ and 5′-GGCAGCTTCTCTGGCATGGGG-3′, respectively. The reaction was performed as described earlier. Samples were amplified using the conditions described for genotyping. Samples were mixed with 10 μl of loading buffer, denatured at 94°C for 5 minutes, and electrophoresed on a 6% polyacrylamide-10% glycerol nondenaturing gel at 8 W for 16 hours. 
Sequencing and Restriction Analysis
Exons 1, 2, and 3 were amplified as described and sequenced using an automated sequencing system (ABI Prism-310 Genetic Analyzer; Perkin Elmer–Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The exon 1 mutation was confirmed by testing for the presence of a restriction site in the mutated allele. Exon 1 was amplified as described above and digested with HinfI, to produce three fragments of 146, 51, and 56 bp in the mutated allele in contrast with the two fragments of 202 and 51 bp in the normal allele. 
Linkage Analysis
Linkage was calculated with the LINKAGE (ver 5.1) package of computer programs, assuming an autosomal recessive model of inheritance, 100% penetrance in both sexes, and a gene frequency of 0.001. The marker order and distance, taken from published sources (http://cedar.genetics.soton.ac.uk/pub/), were as follows: 21 qter-D21S2055-2.62 cM-D21S212-0.55 cM-CRYAA-0.24 cM-D21S1446-pter; 11qter-D11S1986-0.06-cM-CRYAB-6.81 cM-D11S1998-pter. Allele frequencies were also taken from published sources (http://www.gdb.org). 
Results
Using a candidate gene approach, we typed both families with polymorphic PCR markers surrounding the crystallin genes, gap junction genes, or loci to which autosomal dominant cataract has been mapped. Three markers on chromosome 21q in the vicinity of the CRYAA gene segregated with the disease in family 1 (Fig. 1) . Lod score calculations for this family yielded a maximal lod score of 1.93 at θ = 0.00 for the marker D21S212 (data not shown). SCCP analysis performed on the amplification product of the three exons that compose this gene revealed an abnormal migration pattern in exon 1 (Fig. 2) . Sequencing of this exon in one of the affected siblings showed a G-to-A substitution at position 27, resulting in a change of a tryptophan to a stop codon (W9X; Fig. 3 ). Subsequent sequencing of the other two exons did not reveal any other changes. 
This G-to-A change introduces a HinfI restriction site in the mutated allele. We used this restriction site to test the other family members for the mutation and to test for its presence in the normal population. The three affected siblings in this family were found to be homozygous for this substitution, whereas the parents and the unaffected sibling were found to be heterozygous for it (Fig. 4) . We did not find this change in the 70 normal chromosomes that we tested. 
As is evident in Figure 1 , in family 2 the disease did not segregate with chromosome 21 markers. Lod score calculations with the three markers located on both sides of this locus (Table 1) , yielded negative results across the entire interval and ruled out the CRYAA gene as the disease-causing gene in this family. Because the α-crystallin protein is composed of the products of CRYAA and CRYAB, after excluding CRYAA as the gene responsible for the disease in family 2, we checked for linkage between CRYAB and two chromosome 11 markers located close to this gene in this family. The results, presented in Table 1 , ruled out CRYAB as the disease-causing gene in family 2. We also excluded in this family the 12 additional loci involved in autosomal dominant cataract 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 (data not shown). 
Discussion
In this study we showed that a nonsense mutation in the CRYAA gene is responsible for an autosomal recessive form of congenital cataract in an inbred Persian family. This constitutes the first description of the molecular defect underlying nonsyndromic autosomal recessive congenital cataract in humans. 
The α-crystallins that compose up to 50% of the total protein mass of the lens belong to the small heat shock protein family and function as chaperons. 23 Molecular chaperons facilitate the correct folding of proteins in vivo and are of extreme importance in keeping these proteins properly folded and in a functional state. 23 The small heat shock family protein is a group of closely related proteins that are induced by heat or hypertonic stress, bind to aggregation-prone proteins, and act as a reservoir of nonnative folding intermediates that are subsequently refolded by other chaperons. 24 The α-crystallin is a multimeric protein composed from two gene products, αA and αB. CRYAA encodes the αA subunit, whereas αB is encoded by the CRYAB gene located on chromosome 11q. Thus, this multimeric protein is important in maintaining the transparency of the lens, possibly by ensuring that the complexes formed by them and other proteins of the lens remain soluble. 25  
Brady et al. 26 have produced a knockout mouse model for the CRYAA gene. In this animal model, the main disease was detected in the homozygote mice, who at the age of 10 weeks showed development of dense opacity of the lens, whereas no such opacities were detected in the heterozygote mice. In both the knockout mice and family 1, the mutation in the CRYAA gene resulted in a complete or an almost complete absence of the CRYAA protein in the homozygotes and in a recessive mode of inheritance. It seems as though the amount of protein produced by the normal allele in the family 1 heterozygotes and in the knockout mice heterozygotes is sufficient for the normal development and maintenance of the lens, whereas complete absence of the CRYAA protein results in cataract formation. In contrast, a missense mutation (R116C) in the CRYAA gene described by Litt et al., 7 was inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Heterozygosity for this mutation is sufficient to cause cataract, even in the presence of a normal second allele. The abnormal protein caused by the missense mutation may precipitate in the lens, induce the precipitation of other proteins, or interfere with the function of the normal allele (negative dominant effect). 
In family 2 we excluded the CRYAA gene as the cause of the disease, thus providing proof for genetic heterogeneity in autosomal recessive congenital cataract. We also ruled out the CRYAB gene that encodes the αB subunit of the α-crystallin multimer and obviously constitutes an attractive candidate gene for recessive cataract, as well as the 12 other loci involved in autosomal dominant cataract. Ehling 27 estimated that approximately 30 loci are involved in autosomal dominant human congenital cataract. In mice, 40 loci have already been mapped (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Homology/). The estimations about the number of loci involved in recessive congenital cataract are much smaller. 27 As shown for the CRYAA gene in this study, mutations in other loci involved in dominant cataract could very well also account for the autosomal recessive form of the disease. It is also evident that not all the loci involved in human cataract have been mapped. 
 
Figure 1.
 
Family pedigrees and typings (in rectangles) for three markers on chromosome 21q (from top to bottom) D21S2055, D21S212, and D21S1446.
Figure 1.
 
Family pedigrees and typings (in rectangles) for three markers on chromosome 21q (from top to bottom) D21S2055, D21S212, and D21S1446.
Figure 2.
 
SSCP analysis of family 1 and a healthy control individual. The parents and the unaffected sister showed two bands, the three affected siblings showed one (high) band, and the healthy control showed one (low) band.
Figure 2.
 
SSCP analysis of family 1 and a healthy control individual. The parents and the unaffected sister showed two bands, the three affected siblings showed one (high) band, and the healthy control showed one (low) band.
Figure 3.
 
DNA sequence electropherogram of a normal control individual (top) and a patient (bottom): A G-to-A change in the patient (arrow) resulted in a premature stop codon (TGA).
Figure 3.
 
DNA sequence electropherogram of a normal control individual (top) and a patient (bottom): A G-to-A change in the patient (arrow) resulted in a premature stop codon (TGA).
Figure 4.
 
HinfI restriction digest of amplified DNA at the mutation site in family 1. The 253-bp DNA segment is cleaved into three fragments (146, 56, and 51 bp) in the mutated allele, and into two fragments (202 and 51 bp) in the normal allele.
Figure 4.
 
HinfI restriction digest of amplified DNA at the mutation site in family 1. The 253-bp DNA segment is cleaved into three fragments (146, 56, and 51 bp) in the mutated allele, and into two fragments (202 and 51 bp) in the normal allele.
Table 1.
 
Two-Point Lod Scores between Autosomal Recessive Cataract and Chromosome 21q and 11q Markers in Family 2
Table 1.
 
Two-Point Lod Scores between Autosomal Recessive Cataract and Chromosome 21q and 11q Markers in Family 2
Marker/θ 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
D21S2055 −∞ −5.43 −2.76 −1.69 −1.11 −0.74 −0.48 −0.29
D21S212 −∞ −3.68 −1.68 −0.92 −0.53 −0.31 −0.17 −0.09
D21S1446 −∞ −5.22 −2.55 −1.49 −0.94 −0.59 −0.37 −0.21
D11S1986 −∞ −2.99 −1.08 −0.42 −0.14 0.00 0.05 0.05
D11S1988 −∞ −5.09 −2.42 −1.39 −0.85 −0.53 −0.32 −0.18
The authors thank the members of the families for their participation and Daniel L. Kastner for his support. 
Lambert SL, Drack AV. Infantile cataracts. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996;40:427–458. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hejtmancik JF. The genetics of cataract: our vision becomes clearer (editorial). Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:520–525. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Delaye M, Tardieu A. Short-range order of crystallin proteins accounts for eye lens transparency. Nature. 1983;302:415–417. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kantorow M, Piatigorsky J. Alpha-crystallin/small heat shock protein has autokinase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:3112–3116. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Spector A. Oxidative stress-induced cataract: mechanism of action. FASEB J. 1995;9:1173–1182. [PubMed]
Gruijters WT, Kistler J, Bullivant S, Goodenough DA. Immunolocalization of MP70 in lens fiber 16–17 nm intercellular junctions. J Cell Biol. 1987;104:565–572. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Litt M, Kramer P, LaMorticella DM, Murphey W, Lovrien EW, Weleber RG. Autosomal dominant congenital cataract associated with a missense mutation in the human alpha crystallin gene CRYAA. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:471–474. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jeanpierre C, Austruy E, Delattre O, Jones C, Junien C. Subregional physical mapping of an alpha-B-crystallin sequence and of a new expressed sequence D11S877E to human 11q. Mamm Genome. 1993;4:104–108. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vicart P, Caron A, Guicheney P, et al. A missense mutation in the alpha-B-crystallin chaperone gene causes a desmin-related myopathy. Nat Genet. 1998;20:92–95. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kannabiran C, Wawrousek E, Sergeev Y, Rao GN, Kaiser–Kupfer M, Hejtmancik JF. Mutation of beta-A3/A1-crystallin gene in autosomal dominant zonular cataract with sutural opacities results in a protein with single globular domain [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(4)S786.Abstract nr 4138
Litt M, Carrero–Valenzuela R, LaMorticella DM, et al. Autosomal dominant cerulean cataract is associated with a chain termination mutation in the human beta-crystallin gene CRYBB2. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:665–668. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Heon E, Priston M, Schorderet DF, et al. The gamma-crystallins and human cataracts: a puzzle made clearer. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:1261–1267. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shiels A, Mackay D, Ionides A, Berry V, Moore A, Bhattacharya S. A missense mutation in the human connexin 50 gene (GJA8) underlies autosomal ‘zonular pulverulent’ cataract, on chromosome 1q. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:526–532. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mackay D, Ionides A, Kibar Z, et al. Connexin 46 mutations in autosomal dominant congenital cataract. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:1357–1364. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kramer PL, LaMorticella D, Schilling K, Billingslea AM, Weleber G, Litt M. A new locus for autosomal dominant congenital cataract maps to chromosome 3. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:36–39. [PubMed]
Johannes M, Geyer DD, Masser DS, et al. Identification of an autosomal dominant cataract locus on chromosome 12 (abstract). Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63S:A294.
Berry V, Ionides ACW, Moore AT, Plant C, Bhattacharya S, Shiels A. A locus for autosomal dominant anterior polar cataract on chromosome 17p. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5:415–419. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Miller BA, Jaafar MS, Capo H. Chromosome 14- terminal deletion and cataracts. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1053. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Eiberg H, Marner E, Rosenberg T, Mohr J. Marner’s cataract (CAM) assigned to chromosome 16: linkage to haptoglobin. Clin Genet. 1988;34:272–275. [PubMed]
Armitage MM, Kivlin JD, Ferrell RE. A progressive early onset cataract gene maps to human chromosome 17q24. Nat Genet. 1995;9:37–40. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Eiberg H, Lund AM, Warburg M, Rosenberg T. Assignment of congenital cataract Volkmann type (CCV) to chromosome 1p36. Hum Genet. 1995;96:33–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ogata H, Okubo Y, Akabane T. Phenotype i associated with congenital cataract in Japanese. Transfusion. 1979;19:166–168. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kumar LVS, Ramakrishna T, Rao CM. Structural and functional consequences of the mutation of a conserved arginine residue in alpha-A and alpha-B crystallins. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:24137–24141. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ehrnsperger M, Graber S, Gaestel M, Buchner J. Binding of non-native protein to Hsp 25 during heat shock creates a reservoir of folding intermediates for reactivation. EMBO J. 1997;16:221–229. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Caspers G, Leunissen JAM, de Jong WW. The expanding small heat-shock protein family, and structure predictions of the conserved “alpha-crystallin domain”. J Mol Evol. 1995;40:238–248. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brady JP, Garland D, Duglas–Tabor Y, Robison WG, Groome A, Wawrousek EF. Targeted disruption of the mouse alpha A-crystallin gene induces cataract and cytoplasmic inclusion bodies containing the small heat shock protein alpha B-crystallin. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:884–889. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ehling UH. , Genetic risk assessment. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:255–280. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
 
Family pedigrees and typings (in rectangles) for three markers on chromosome 21q (from top to bottom) D21S2055, D21S212, and D21S1446.
Figure 1.
 
Family pedigrees and typings (in rectangles) for three markers on chromosome 21q (from top to bottom) D21S2055, D21S212, and D21S1446.
Figure 2.
 
SSCP analysis of family 1 and a healthy control individual. The parents and the unaffected sister showed two bands, the three affected siblings showed one (high) band, and the healthy control showed one (low) band.
Figure 2.
 
SSCP analysis of family 1 and a healthy control individual. The parents and the unaffected sister showed two bands, the three affected siblings showed one (high) band, and the healthy control showed one (low) band.
Figure 3.
 
DNA sequence electropherogram of a normal control individual (top) and a patient (bottom): A G-to-A change in the patient (arrow) resulted in a premature stop codon (TGA).
Figure 3.
 
DNA sequence electropherogram of a normal control individual (top) and a patient (bottom): A G-to-A change in the patient (arrow) resulted in a premature stop codon (TGA).
Figure 4.
 
HinfI restriction digest of amplified DNA at the mutation site in family 1. The 253-bp DNA segment is cleaved into three fragments (146, 56, and 51 bp) in the mutated allele, and into two fragments (202 and 51 bp) in the normal allele.
Figure 4.
 
HinfI restriction digest of amplified DNA at the mutation site in family 1. The 253-bp DNA segment is cleaved into three fragments (146, 56, and 51 bp) in the mutated allele, and into two fragments (202 and 51 bp) in the normal allele.
Table 1.
 
Two-Point Lod Scores between Autosomal Recessive Cataract and Chromosome 21q and 11q Markers in Family 2
Table 1.
 
Two-Point Lod Scores between Autosomal Recessive Cataract and Chromosome 21q and 11q Markers in Family 2
Marker/θ 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
D21S2055 −∞ −5.43 −2.76 −1.69 −1.11 −0.74 −0.48 −0.29
D21S212 −∞ −3.68 −1.68 −0.92 −0.53 −0.31 −0.17 −0.09
D21S1446 −∞ −5.22 −2.55 −1.49 −0.94 −0.59 −0.37 −0.21
D11S1986 −∞ −2.99 −1.08 −0.42 −0.14 0.00 0.05 0.05
D11S1988 −∞ −5.09 −2.42 −1.39 −0.85 −0.53 −0.32 −0.18
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×