The quantification of changes of the conjunctival stroma in the
areas of collagen fibers, amorphous material, and optically clear
spaces in areas without cells or vessels showed significant differences
among the four groups and the control eyes (
Table 3 ;
Fig. 6 ).
In the subepithelial layer, the percentage of area occupied by collagen
fibers was significantly higher in groups 2, 3, and 4 than in the
control and group 1. Although the amount of collagen fibers was
approximately 53% in the control samples, there was an increase of
approximately 36% in groups 2, 3, and 4. There was no significant
difference between the control eyes and group 1 (P <
0.72; Mann–Whitney). The amount of amorphous material was low in the
control eyes (approximately 8%), and there was no significant
difference in comparison to group 1 (P < 0.29).
However, there was a significant increase when the control eyes were
compared with groups 2, 3, and 4 (P < 0.03; P < 0.05; P < 0.03). Similarly,
approximately 40% of the area measured appeared as optically clear
spaces in control eyes, with a mild reduction in group 1
(P < 0.08) and a significant decrease when compared
with groups 2, 3, and 4 (P < 0.03; P < 0.05; P < 0.03).
In the deeper layers of the conjunctival substantia propria,
the amount of collagen fibers in the control eyes was no
different in comparison with collagen in the subepithelial layer.
Again, there was no difference between the control group and group 1
(P < 0.48), but there were significant increases in
groups 2, 3, and 4. In addition, the differences between group 1 and
groups 2, 3, and 4 were significant (P < 0.03; P < 0.05; P < 0.03). The increase of
amorphous material between the control eyes and group 1 was not
significant (P < 0.16), but it was significant when
compared with groups 2, 3, and 4. Furthermore, the differences between
group 1 and groups 2, 3, and 4 were significant (P <
0.02; P < 0.03; P < 0.02). There was
no reduction of optically empty spaces between the control group and
group 1 (P < 0.29). The significant reduction of
optically empty spaces occurred when the groups 2, 3, and 4 were
compared with the control eyes (P < 0.03; P < 0.05; P < 0.03). The difference
between group 1 and groups 2, 3, and 4 again was significant
(P < 0.02; P < 0.03; P < 0.02).