RT-PCR using retinal RNA and degenerate oligonucleotide
primers
9 amplified cDNAs with homology to vertebrate
sequences for both the IGF-1 and the IRs. (A description of the
goldfish IGF-1 receptor will be reported elsewhere [Otteson DC,
Cirenza PF, Hitchcock PF, unpublished results]; see Ref.
11 for a preliminary report.) Comparison of the
nucleotide sequences showed that clones encoding the goldfish IR were
partial cDNAs, which segregated into two groups that were 67.9%
identical (data not shown). Clones in the first group, designated
gfIR-1, were 1740 bp in length; clones in the second group,
designated
gfIR-2, were 1752 bp in length. The deduced amino
acid sequences
(Fig. 1) show that both
gfIR-1 and
gfIR-2 encode a
portion of the extracellular α-domain, the transmembrane domain, and
a portion of the intracellular β-domain. In addition, both clones
contain sequences common to all receptor tyrosine kinases, including
conserved cysteine (C) and tyrosine (Y) residues, the tetrabasic
proteolytic cleavage site (RRRR/RQRR), and the tyrosine kinase
signature sequence (GxGxxG21xK).
12 gfIR-1 and
gfIR-2 share similar levels of
identity when compared with equivalent sequences of IRs from humans and
fish (salmon and turbot;
Table 1 ,
Fig. 1 ). A pairwise comparison of amino acid sequences between
gfIR-1 and
-2 and cDNAs for the two goldfish
IGF-1 receptors showed that the goldfish IR was more similar to IR
homologues from other animals than to goldfish IGF-1R
(Table 1) ,
consistent with the interpretation that
gfIR-1 and
-2 are distinct from the cDNAs encoding the IGF-1 receptor.
Further, comparisons between
gfIR-1 and
-2 showed
that they are only 69.7% identical (
Fig. 1 and
Table 1 ). We interpret
this difference in sequence identity, at both the nucleotide and amino
acid levels, to indicate that
gfIR-1 and
-2 transcripts represent two, nonallelic genes encoding the IR.