The CE is an unusual structure, in that two epithelia with
different properties are fused face-to-face, joined by gap junctions
between their respective apical membranes. Ocular fluid is secreted
across both layers. Only the NPE layer has the tight junctions typical
of ion- and water-transporting epithelia, serving as the barrier for
the whole structure. NaK-ATPase lines the basolateral surfaces of both
PE and NPE cells, pointing, as it were, in opposite directions. Ghosh
et al.
12 proposed that the CE may in fact be capable of
transport in both directions. Transport by the α1β1 isoform of the
PE would reabsorb Na
+ (and therefore ocular
fluid), whereas transport by the α2β2 (their work in bovine
subjects) or α2β3 (the present study) isoform of the NPE would
secrete Na
+ and ocular fluid. Current models for
the mechanism of ocular fluid secretion take into consideration the
distribution of other important membrane transporters—notably,
Cl
− channels and aquaporin and
bumetanide-sensitive
Na
+K
+Cl
− transporter—as major players in net outward
transport.
22 23 24 The apparently symmetrical distribution
of some components
23 raises intriguing questions, however.
The reproducible difference in NaK-ATPase α subunit isoforms between
NPE and PE suggests a difference in properties or functional role.
Something has been learned about the intrinsic properties of the
isoforms from expression studies. First, when expressed in
Xenopus oocytes, the human α2 isoform had approximately
half the turnover rate of the α1 isoform, and the α3 isoform had
even less.
8 In addition to different intrinsic maximal
rates, the isoforms differed in their affinity for
Na
+ and K
+. The α1
isoform had a significantly higher affinity for both
Na
+ and K
+ than did α2,
whereas α3 had a K
+ affinity similar to α1
but a Na
+ affinity much lower than α1 orα
2.
8 Somewhat different results were obtained for rat
isoforms expressed in insect cells,
7 in which α2 had a
higher affinity for Na
+ and a lower affinity for
K
+ than did α1. The α3 isoform, in contrast,
had a significantly lower affinity for both ions. In mammalian cells,α
3 again had the lowest Na
+ affinity.
25 However, other investigators showed that these
specific properties were found to vary, depending on the cellular
context
26 27 and on whether the modulatory γ subunit was
expressed.
19
One isoform-specific feature that could play a role in the relative
rates of transport in the NPE and PE is the voltage-dependence of the
pump. The voltage dependence of NaK-ATPase is controlled, not by a
voltage sensor segment analogous to voltage-dependent ion channel, but
by passage of departing Na
+ ions through an ion
well wide enough to be influenced by the transmembrane
field.
28 Crambert et al.
8 reported that α2
has a steeper voltage dependence than α1, whereas α3 has a voltage
dependence that is almost flat. In their experiments in
Xenopus oocytes, the voltage dependencies were normalized at−
50 mV, and relative to that voltage, hyperpolarization would favor
transport by α1, whereas depolarization would favor transport byα
2. Transport by α3 would be strongly favored at hyperpolarizing
potentials compared with the other two isoforms, whereas at
depolarizing potentials it would remain fixed, and the others would
increase. Previous studies in the rabbit have shown that the
conductance of the gap junctions between the cells of the NPE and PE
can be modulated by adrenergic stimulation, hindering the passage of
ions through these junctions.
29 30 Therefore, it is
possible for the two layers to have different potentials. We could
speculate that changes in voltage mediated by the regulation of gap
junctions and K
+ channels would affect the
relative activities of the two types of NaK-ATPase in the two layers of
the CE.
The other likely reason for expressing two different kinds of
NaK-ATPase in two cells joined by gap junctions is to permit their
separate regulation by second messengers.
12 31 Regulation
of the NaK-ATPase, particularly in NPE cells, is an active field, but
the role of specific isoforms is yet to be investigated. Only a few
studies have investigated the underlying mechanisms of regulation ofα
2 and α3 in any tissue.
7 32 33 This mechanism should
be the focus of future work on the CE. In 1991 Ghosh et
al.
12 proposed that the α1β1 isoform of PE may be
unregulated because of the perception that this subunit combination is
the housekeeping form of the enzyme, whereas the other isoforms of the
NPE may be specialized to respond to environmental factors. Since then,
however, active regulation of α1β1 has been described through a
variety of mechanisms in other tissues,34 and modulation
of ocular fluid transport could as easily include inhibition ofα
1β1 as activation of α2β3.
The authors thank Bradley T. Hyman for use of the confocal
microscope, and Robert Levenson, Christo Goridis, Andrea
Quaroni, Melitta Schachner, and Phillip W. Beesley for the gift of
specific antibodies.